Good news within the federal regulatory leviathan has been depressingly rare, perhaps most of all at…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
Positive News: FCC Delays Vote on Toxic TV Set-Top Box Scheme

Good news within the federal regulatory leviathan has been depressingly rare, perhaps most of all at the Federal Communications Commission (FCC).  This week, however, brought a remarkably welcome development worthy of celebration.

Specifically, the FCC delayed its vote on a toxic and entirely unwarranted new proposal to regulate cable television set-top boxes before the Obama presidency's clock expires, in what The Wall Street Journal labeled "a major blow to the proposal" and "a setback to Federal Communications Commission Chairman Tom Wheeler on one of his top priorities for the year."

Even Democrats have attacked the scheme as a "massive new federal regulation," and CFIF stands alongside a broad coalition of conservative and libertarian organizations in opposition.  The…[more]

September 30, 2016 • 12:08 pm

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Jester's CourtroomLegal tales stranger than stranger than fiction: Ridiculous and sometimes funny lawsuits plaguing our courts.
Justice Reform Legislation: Prosecution Should Require Criminal Intent
By Timothy H. Lee
Thursday, December 10 2015
Before charging an American citizen with a crime, thereby forcing that person to face the weight of federal, state or local power, government should at least allege that the citizen actually intended to commit a crime.  Unfortunately, that's increasingly not the case in America today.  The number of federal criminal statutes now measures approximately 5,000, and approximately 300,000 more criminal offenses exist amid the vast expanse of federal administrative regulations.  As a result, neither Congress nor the executive Department of Justice can even determine how many criminal…
 
For Sanity’s Sake, Remember the Ray Bradbury Rule
When disaster strikes, to where do people turn? Usually, the television. Earthquakes, wildfires, shootings…
Read more...
The President's Speech
When the President of the United States asks the television networks to set aside time for him to broadcast…
Read more...
 
Climate Talks Reveal Progressivism's True Hypocrisy
What do you call it when elites fly their private jets to an international climate change conference…
Read more...
The CAIR Effect: See Something, Do Nothing
The CAIR Effect: See Something, Do Nothing As news of the San Bernardino jihadist shootings blared on…
Read more...
 
'Nothing to do With Islam'
In the aftermath of Paris and before San Bernardino, Hillary Clinton articulated the forced catechism…
Read more...
Another Global Warming Projection Fails, But Obama Digs In
"The streak survives.  For the 10th year running, Florida dodged a hurricane, setting a new…
Read more...
 
Government Endorses Discrimination for “Diversity’s” Sake
Next week, the U.S. Supreme Court is scheduled to hear oral arguments in Fisher v. University of Texas…
Read more...
Deadly D.C.: The Land of No Consequences
In life and leadership, accountability means consequences for bad behavior. In Washington, accountability…
Read more...
 
A Resurgence of Intolerance
Storm trooper tactics by bands of college students making ideological demands across the country, and…
Read more...
Have a Happy, Politics-Free Thanksgiving
Many people naturally assume that since I work in political journalism, I must breathe, drink and eat…
Read more...
Question of the Week   
The first session of the U.S. Supreme Court was held on February 1, 1790, in which one of the following cities?
More Questions
Quote of the Day   
 
"As the nation weighs who should next be trusted with the presidency, the current occupant of the White House seems poised to provide yet another reminder of the importance of maintaining checks on executive power. President Obama's Department of Health and Human Services has in recent weeks floated the possibility of the federal government using a backdoor method to funnel money to insurers losing…[more]
 
 
—The Editors, Washington Examiner
— The Editors, Washington Examiner
 
Liberty Poll   

How likely are you to watch the televised Vice Presidential debate on October 4?