Democrats hope to press the "affordability" issue in this year's midterm election season, but there'…
CFIF on X CFIF on YouTube
Inflation: Comparing Trump and Biden...

Democrats hope to press the "affordability" issue in this year's midterm election season, but there's one potentially glaring problem for them, as illustrated by our friends at Unleash Prosperity... Biden Versus Trump on Inflation

 …[more]

August 17, 2026 • 04:40 PM
Home Jester's Courtroom Occupy Courtroom
Occupy Courtroom Print
Wednesday, November 30 2011

Two warring factions of the Occupy Boston movement are headed to court.

Self-proclaimed original Boston occupier Paul Carnes is suing four other tent city residents alleging breach of contract, intentional infliction of emotional distress and violation of the state's consumer protection laws. According to news reports, Carnes filed the three-count complaint to protect the business entity known as Occupy Boston and to stop the other faction from getting too much power.

“We want to take Occupy Boston back,” said Carnes, who officially registered Occupy Boston as a "doing business entity" with the city of Boston on October 18th.  "I formed the financial accountability group because the donations were coming in, and the money was getting taken, so we started putting this together."

A week later, another occupier registered another "doing business as" entity in the name of Occupy Boston-Financial Accountability Working Group.  Carnes accuses this group of using funds to purchase tents and clothes without the permission of other members.

Defendant David Kelston calls the lawsuit groundless. "There was a mediated agreement that was reached and FAWG (Occupy's Financial Accountability Working Group) has upheld that agreement," said Kelston.

—Source:  BostonHerald.com

Notable Quote   
 
"Writing in the Wall Street Journal last week, former Fidelity Investments head Robert Pozen wrote what he always has, and that countless budget and Social Security scolds have written before him. According to Pozen and a Rose Bowl-sized collection of commentators who've come before and who've yet to come, a combination of benefit cuts and 'revenue measures' (yes, tax increases on the richest…[more]
 
 
— John Tamny, Editor of RealClearMarkets, President of the Parkview Institute, and Senior Fellow at the Market Institute
 
Liberty Poll   

Should there be a full-scale investigation of the Alaska Senate race in which a candidate with virtually the same name as the incumbent was recruited into the race to induce voter confusion.