Democrats hope to press the "affordability" issue in this year's midterm election season, but there'…
CFIF on X CFIF on YouTube
Inflation: Comparing Trump and Biden...

Democrats hope to press the "affordability" issue in this year's midterm election season, but there's one potentially glaring problem for them, as illustrated by our friends at Unleash Prosperity...

[caption id="" align="alignleft" width="668"] Biden Versus Trump on Inflation[/caption]

 …[more]

August 17, 2026 • 04:40 PM
Home Jester's Courtroom Occupy Courtroom
Occupy Courtroom Print
Wednesday, November 30 2011

Two warring factions of the Occupy Boston movement are headed to court.

Self-proclaimed original Boston occupier Paul Carnes is suing four other tent city residents alleging breach of contract, intentional infliction of emotional distress and violation of the state's consumer protection laws. According to news reports, Carnes filed the three-count complaint to protect the business entity known as Occupy Boston and to stop the other faction from getting too much power.

“We want to take Occupy Boston back,” said Carnes, who officially registered Occupy Boston as a "doing business entity" with the city of Boston on October 18th.  "I formed the financial accountability group because the donations were coming in, and the money was getting taken, so we started putting this together."

A week later, another occupier registered another "doing business as" entity in the name of Occupy Boston-Financial Accountability Working Group.  Carnes accuses this group of using funds to purchase tents and clothes without the permission of other members.

Defendant David Kelston calls the lawsuit groundless. "There was a mediated agreement that was reached and FAWG (Occupy's Financial Accountability Working Group) has upheld that agreement," said Kelston.

—Source:  BostonHerald.com

Notable Quote   
 
"The U.S. Supreme Court will kick off its 2026 term next week with what will be one of its biggest cases of the year. And according to several legal specialists, there's much more to the dispute than meets the eye.The case in question is Suncor v. Boulder, which deals with the lawfare that Boulder, Colorado, launched against Suncor Energy companies and the Exxon Mobil Corporation. The city is seeking…[more]
 
 
— Shawn Fleetwood, Teh Federalist
 
Liberty Poll   

Based on the meteoric development of AI, do you believe that your job is going to be threatened or enhanced?