How big is a "gap" in coverage when it affects 840,000 people? The Los Angeles Times says that California…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
Another ObamaCare Gap in Coverage Exposes Tangled Safety Net

How big is a "gap" in coverage when it affects 840,000 people?

The Los Angeles Times says that California is racing to pass a “bridge” program into law that helps individuals and families likely to be caught between qualifying for Medi-Cal (the state’s version of Medicaid), and ObamaCare’s new state-based health insurance exchange.

In California, residents earning up to 138% of the federal poverty level, or about $15,000 a year, will be eligible for Medi-Cal next year. Individuals earning up to 400% of the federal poverty level, or about $46,000, will be eligible for subsidies through the exchange, known as Covered California.

The Covered California board approved a plan in March to help patients expected to jump between the two. The "bridge plan" would enable patients now on…[more]

May 21, 2013 • 06:54 pm

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Jester's CourtroomLegal tales stranger than stranger than fiction: Ridiculous and sometimes funny lawsuits plaguing our courts.
Home Jester's Courtroom Lawsuit Against Fireworks Pops Up
Lawsuit Against Fireworks Pops Up Print
Thursday, June 28 2012

For the third year in a row environmentalists have filed a lawsuit challenging the popular Fourth of July fireworks show in La Jolla, California.

Attorney Marco Gonzalez and the Coastal Environmental Rights Foundation claim that tens of thousands of people will convene on beaches to watch the July 4 display, which "results in a massive cloud of explosion by-product smoke above the spectators and ocean, and fallout from the fireworks show … in the water.”  Gonzalez maintains that nothing is more patriotic than clean water and he is focused on the event because it's near a biologically sensitive marine area.

Similar lawsuits were filed in 2010 and 2011 by the plaintiffs and in 2011 a judge sided with the environmentalists, stating the city of San Diego is allowing and permitting fireworks show without an environmental review of the impact on the water.  Just recently, a judge agreed with the prior court ruling that the city must conduct the review. 

“We believe it [for the city to allow the fireworks to proceed] was both illegal and underhanded,” Gonzalez said Friday. “The city has thumbed its nose at the court and done anything in its power to get out of disclosing the true impacts of fireworks shows in La Jolla.”

Gonzalez doesn't think there is sufficient time to get an eleventh-hour restraining order to stop this year's festivities and organizers expect the show to go on.

“I am trying to be smart about this for you and me,” Gonzalez told the city council. “It’s time to sit down and work out a solution.”

The council is expected to discuss fireworks-related litigation in closed session on July 3rd, potentially deciding whether to appeal the recent court decisions.

“The La Jolla Community Fireworks Foundation has no intention of being bullied by this senseless and wasteful litigation,” said Robert Howard, a lawyer for the group that hosts the celebration.

—Source:  utsandiego.com

Question of the Week   
How long after the 1972 break-in of the DNC Watergate Headquarters did Richard Nixon resign as President of the United States?
More Questions
Quote of the Day   
 
"First they came for Fox News, and they did not speak out — because they were not Fox News. Then they came for government whistleblowers, and they did not speak out — because they were not government whistleblowers. Then they came for the maker of a YouTube video, and — okay, we know how this story ends. But how did we get here?  Turns out it’s a fairly swift sojourn from…[more]
 
 
—Kirsten Powers, The Daily Beast
— Kirsten Powers, The Daily Beast
 
Liberty Poll   

Which of the Obama administration scandals are you following most closely?