Democrats hope to press the "affordability" issue in this year's midterm election season, but there'…
CFIF on X CFIF on YouTube
Inflation: Comparing Trump and Biden...

Democrats hope to press the "affordability" issue in this year's midterm election season, but there's one potentially glaring problem for them, as illustrated by our friends at Unleash Prosperity...

[caption id="" align="alignleft" width="668"] Biden Versus Trump on Inflation[/caption]

 …[more]

August 17, 2026 • 04:40 PM
Home Jester's Courtroom The Tables Have Turned
The Tables Have Turned Print
Wednesday, November 12 2014

A federal judge in Texas ruled that The Sierra Club’s recent lawsuit against Texas power generator Luminant was "frivolous" and warranted the repayment of $6.4 million in legal fees to Luminant.

According to news reports, The Sierra Club had sued Luminant claiming that it had broken federal air pollution laws by emitting more soot and other particulates into the atmosphere than what permits allowed at one of their power plants. The Sierra Club was seeking $330 million in damages and $140 million in pollution control upgrades.

As it turns out, however, in its rush to the courthouse, The Sierra Club failed to take note of environmental reports issued by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) that concluded Luminant committed no Clean Air violations. As stated in his opinion, U.S. District Judge Walter S. Smith said, "Even with this knowledge at its disposal, plaintiff admitted that they failed to analyze or investigate the TCEQ investigation reports and filed suit. Consequently, after immense discovery, expense and use of judicial resources, this court found no evidence supporting any deficiency in the TCEQ's investigation reports."

 Al Armendariz, Sierra Club's Beyond Coal campaign director, countered that the Club is “confident the court of appeals will reverse this decision.”

—Source: biggreenradicals.com

Notable Quote   
 
"The U.S. Supreme Court will kick off its 2026 term next week with what will be one of its biggest cases of the year. And according to several legal specialists, there's much more to the dispute than meets the eye.The case in question is Suncor v. Boulder, which deals with the lawfare that Boulder, Colorado, launched against Suncor Energy companies and the Exxon Mobil Corporation. The city is seeking…[more]
 
 
— Shawn Fleetwood, Teh Federalist
 
Liberty Poll   

Based on the meteoric development of AI, do you believe that your job is going to be threatened or enhanced?