Consumer spending accounts for approximately two-thirds of the U.S. economy, so Joe Biden's crushing…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
Image of the Day: "Bidenomics" Crushes Consumer Confidence

Consumer spending accounts for approximately two-thirds of the U.S. economy, so Joe Biden's crushing impact on consumer confidence helps resolve his apologists' confusion over Biden's economic disapproval.  After inheriting an economy rebounding from the Covid shock, Biden's policies quickly drove consumer confidence back downward, where it continues to stagnate.  No wonder he finds himself in such electoral hot water.

[caption id="" align="alignleft" width="849"] Bidenomics Crushes Consumer Confidence[/caption]

 …[more]

May 08, 2024 • 12:39 PM

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Home Jester's Courtroom Juiced Up Jelly Belly Lawsuit
Juiced Up Jelly Belly Lawsuit Print
Tuesday, May 30 2017

A California woman has filed a class action lawsuit against the makers of Jelly Belly jelly beans, alleging the candy company used "fancy phrasing" to mislead customers into believing its Sport Beans were free of sugar.

Jessica Gomez claims the use of "evaporated cane juice" in the exercise supplement's list of ingredients violates the state's Consumer Legal Remedies Act, Unfair Business Practices Law and False Advertising Law, and, thus, requires the label to cite "sugar" as an ingredient.

In a Motion to Dismiss, Jelly Belly called the case "nonsense," arguing, “No reasonable consumer could have been deceived by Sport Beans’ labeling – Gomez could not have seen ‘evaporated cane juice’ without also seeing the product’s sugar content on its Nutrition Facts panel."

Although the FDA's guidelines encourage firms to accurately describe the basic nature of sweeteners used, Jelly Belly maintains the case should be thrown out primarily because "Plaintiff does not explain why an athlete—or anyone—would be surprised to find sugar in a product described as 'Jelly Beans'."

Source: foxnews.com

Notable Quote   
 
"I didn't expect debates in 2024. It seemed to me that there was too much risk involved for both Biden and Trump. Nor is there a mandate of heaven for presidential debates. But the two candidates calculate risk differently -- that's probably why they are presidents. In their view, the potential upside of watching your opponent melt down is greater than the risk of tripping up. If you do implode, you…[more]
 
 
— Matthew Continetti, Washington Free Beacon
 
Liberty Poll   

Do you believe televised debates between President Biden and former President Trump will actually happen or will fall apart for many potential reasons?