As we at CFIF often highlight, strong intellectual property (IP) rights - including patent rights -…
CFIF on X CFIF on YouTube
Senate Must Support Strong Patent Rights, Not Erode Them

As we at CFIF often highlight, strong intellectual property (IP) rights - including patent rights - constitute a core element of "American Exceptionalism" and explain how we became the most inventive, prosperous, technologically advanced nation in human history.  Our Founding Fathers considered IP so important that they explicitly protected it in the text of Article I of the United States Constitution.

Strong patent rights also explain how the U.S. accounts for an incredible two-thirds of all new lifesaving drugs introduced worldwide.

Elected officials must therefore work to protect strong IP and patent rights, not undermine them.   Unfortunately, several anti-patent bills currently before the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee this week threaten to do exactly…[more]

April 02, 2025 • 08:29 PM

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Home Jester's Courtroom A "Scent-sational" Win
A "Scent-sational" Win Print
Wednesday, October 10 2012

The manufacturer of odor-reducing carbon hunting apparel recently claimed a global victory in nine federal lawsuits challenging its ability to control human odor.

ALS Enterprises, Inc., the maker of Scent-Lok, was sued in nine cases, including one in the U.S. District Court, Northern District of Florida, filed by Dennis Pickering. In this consumer class action case, Pickering alleged that the manufacturer's carbon hunting clothing did not work as advertised. In a related case before the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, expert testimony led to a court finding that the advertisements were not "literally false."

In August of 2012, the district court in the lead case granted the manufacturer's motion to dismiss.  In that order, it was stated that, "the Court is firmly convinced that 'this litigation is so feeble that it is best to end it immediately,' as its 'only goal...appears to be fees for the plaintiffs' lawyers.' Indeed, it would simply ignore reality to believe that this case is about anything other than fees at this juncture, given the small number of Plaintiffs and the paltry damages they could recover if they were to prevail. There exists no perceptible public benefit."

Less than a week later, all remaining lawsuits were settled through a stipulation of dismissal with prejudice. 

Greg Sesselmann, Scent-Lok's president and the inventor of carbon hunting clothing, commented, "We are gratified and vindicated by our win in these nine lawsuits. ... It saddens me to think that plaintiffs and their lawyers are allowed to use the legal system to bring groundless lawsuits against companies like ours."
 
—Source:  scentlok.com

Notable Quote   
 
"Across the country, a new defense is being heard in state and federal courtrooms. From Democratic members of Congress to judges to city council members, officials claim that their official duties include obstructing the official functions of the federal government. It is a type of liberal license that excuses most any crime in the name of combating what Minn. Gov. Tim Walz called the 'moodern-day…[more]
 
 
— Jonathan Turley, the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University
 
Liberty Poll   

Do you support or oppose the "one big, beautiful bill" that passed the House by one vote, and has seriously divided Republicans?