Democrats hope to press the "affordability" issue in this year's midterm election season, but there'…
CFIF on X CFIF on YouTube
Inflation: Comparing Trump and Biden...

Democrats hope to press the "affordability" issue in this year's midterm election season, but there's one potentially glaring problem for them, as illustrated by our friends at Unleash Prosperity...

[caption id="" align="alignleft" width="668"] Biden Versus Trump on Inflation[/caption]

 …[more]

August 17, 2026 • 04:40 PM
Home Press Room Coalition to U.S. Senate: No More Obama Nominees Until Pres. Secures Resignations of Unconstitutional “Recess” Appointments
Coalition to U.S. Senate: No More Obama Nominees Until Pres. Secures Resignations of Unconstitutional “Recess” Appointments Print
Monday, January 30 2012

Center for Individual Freedom (CFIF) President Jeffrey Mazzella this week joined with more than 50 conservative organization leaders in a letter calling on all U.S. Senators “to prevent the consideration and approval of any further nominations unless and until President Obama secures the resignations of the individuals he unconstitutionally appointed earlier this month.”

The letter is in response to President Obama’s January 4, 2012, “recess” appointments of Richard Cordray to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and Sharon Block, Terence Flynn and Richard Griffin to the National Labor Relations Board. 

As the letter notes, “According to Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution, the President is required to obtain the advice and consent of the Senate for his appointments. A narrow exception to that requirement allows the President to ‘fill up all Vacancies that may happen during the Recess of the Senate.’

“However, the Senate was not in Recess… In fact, the House of Representatives did not consent to the Senate taking a Recess, and therefore, the Senate was in a pro forma session.  Not only did the President make appointments without the advice and consent of the Senate, but he appointed one, Richard Cordray, whom the Senate had previously rejected.”

To read the letter, click here (.pdf).

Related Articles :
Notable Quote   
 
"A House Judiciary Committee investigation into the Environmental Policy Institute's Climate Judiciary Project confirms critics' claims that the group's judicial training provides activist-driven materials aimed at biasing judges overseeing climate litigation cases.The Environmental Policy Institute established the Climate Judiciary Project (CJP) in 2018 to provide “'judges with authoritative…[more]
 
 
— Kevin Killough, Just the News
 
Liberty Poll   

Based on the meteoric development of AI, do you believe that your job is going to be threatened or enhanced?