We've recently highlighted how right-to-work states, which the Biden Administration and Congressional…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
Amazon Workers Soundly Reject Unionization, and NR's Kevin Williamson Highlights Another Great Reason Why: Big-Labor Corruption

We've recently highlighted how right-to-work states, which the Biden Administration and Congressional leftists hope to abolish, dramatically outperform forced-union states in terms of job growth, manufacturing and household consumption.  Worker freedom from Big Labor bosses is a leading reason why in a high-profile vote, Amazon workers in Alabama voted to reject unionization by a 71% to 29% margin last week.

In a phenomenal new piece, National Review's Kevin Williamson offers another reason for rejecting unionization that we mustn't ignore:  big labor bosses' widespread corruption.  Williamson lists a litany of union officials convicted and sentenced for embezzlement and other misuse of members' hard-earned dues - in 2020 alone.  Accordingly, the leftist anti-capitalist drumbeat…[more]

April 12, 2021 • 01:05 PM

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Jester's CourtroomLegal tales stranger than stranger than fiction: Ridiculous and sometimes funny lawsuits plaguing our courts.
Home Press Room CFIF to FCC: Proposed “Net Neutrality” Rules Would Smother Internet Innovation and Damage the American Economy
CFIF to FCC: Proposed “Net Neutrality” Rules Would Smother Internet Innovation and Damage the American Economy Print
Thursday, January 14 2010

ALEXANDRIA, VA – In its official comment submitted today, the Center for Individual Freedom (CFIF) counseled the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) that its proposed “Net Neutrality” regulations constitute nothing more than a counterproductive “solution” in search of a speculative problem, and would stifle America’s vital Internet sector, bringing further harm to the ailing U.S. economy. 

CFIF filed its comment in response to the FCC’s October 22, 2009 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, which contemplates imposing unnecessary Net Neutrality rules, whose leading advocates have stated openly and explicitly that, “what we want to have in the U.S. and in every society is an Internet that is not private property, but a public utility.”    

“Since the 1996 Telecommunications Act, the Internet has thrived and played a central role in maintaining America’s status as the most prosperous, most entrepreneurial and most innovative nation in human history,” said Timothy Lee, CFIF’s Vice-President of Legal and Public Affairs.  “This didn’t happen by accident or coincidence,” he added.  “Rather, it has occurred precisely because the government has refrained from suffocating it with meritless overregulation. 

“The term ‘Net Neutrality’ itself is dishonest, because such regulations are anything but ‘neutral,’” said Mr. Lee.  “To the contrary, Net Neutrality would constitute bald corporate welfare by regulating Internet service providers to the benefit of self-interested content providers, powerful corporate interests and partisan activists. 

“At a time in which the American public is justifiably opposed to more and more federal regulation and bureaucratic control over our lives, meritless regulations heaped upon an Internet sector that thrived since 1996 without Net Neutrality are counterproductive to the FCC’s and Administration’s goals of ubiquitous broadband access,” Lee continued.  “Rather, flexibility and freedom for consumers and Internet service providers to manage networks and bring new innovations to market are critical to achieve that goal.  Net Neutrality will only undermine incentives to further invest and innovate, with American consumers ultimately paying the price. 

“The bottom line is that future Internet growth and innovation depend wholly upon encouraging continued private investment in high-speed networks, which has brought us such breathtaking progress in just over one decade.  The FCC should abandon its proposed Net Neutrality rule, and instead work to incentivize – or at least refrain from disincentivizing – further private investment in high-speed Internet infrastructure,” Lee concluded. 

To read CFIF’s comment as it was submitted to the FCC, click here (.pdf)

###


To schedule an interview with Timothy Lee, please call 703-535-5836.

The Center for Individual Freedom is a non-profit, non-partisan organization with over 250,000 grassroots supporters and activists established in 1998 to safeguard and advance Constitutional rights and free-market principles, and to ensure continued American innovation, leadership, economic prosperity and worldwide entrepreneurial preeminence. 


 

Quiz Question   
In which century were the first mandatory vaccination laws enacted in the United States?
More Questions
Notable Quote   
 
"Democrats may well follow through on threats to add four new Justices to the Supreme Court -- though they have only three seats to spare in the House and a 50-50 tie in the Senate broken by Vice President Kamala Harris. But when Republicans inevitably retake the presidency and Congress they will retaliate by increasing the Supreme Court by another four or five Justices. Soon the Court will become…[more]
 
 
—John Yoo, University of California Professor of Law, Hoover Institution Visiting Fellow and AEI Visiting Scholar
— John Yoo, University of California Professor of Law, Hoover Institution Visiting Fellow and AEI Visiting Scholar
 
Liberty Poll   

Do you believe Democrats are serious about expanding the Supreme Court from 9 justices (since 1869) to 13 or are they just throwing rhetorical red meat to their base?