Today, continuing our longstanding opposition to the ruination of American healthcare by importing foreign…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
CFIF Joins 75-Group National & State Coalition Opposing Socialized Medicine and Importation of Foreign Price Controls

Today, continuing our longstanding opposition to the ruination of American healthcare by importing foreign price controls and socialized medicine, CFIF proudly joins a 75-group coalition letter to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services opposing the interim final rule to implement the "Most Favored Nation" (MFN) model under Section 1115A of the Social Security Act, which forces physicians, patients and providers into a mandatory demonstration under the ObamaCare Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMMI), and which ties prices paid for medicines in Medicare Part B to the prices paid in socialized healthcare systems of foreign nations.

Specifically, the letter explains in detail how the rule will do nothing to stop foreign freeloading off of American pharmaceutical innovation…[more]

January 25, 2021 • 04:53 PM

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Jester's CourtroomLegal tales stranger than stranger than fiction: Ridiculous and sometimes funny lawsuits plaguing our courts.
Home Press Room CFIF to Congress: Don’t Mimic California’s Failures in Addressing Surprise Medical Billing Problem
CFIF to Congress: Don’t Mimic California’s Failures in Addressing Surprise Medical Billing Problem Print
Monday, December 16 2019

ALEXANDRIA, VA – Surprise medical billing – which occurs when patients suddenly receive unexpected bills from medical providers not covered by their insurance – remains an important issue demanding a Congressional solution.  According to numerous reports, it now appears that Congressional legislation addressing the issue will not emerge from Congress this calendar year due to ongoing debate.  As federal lawmakers scramble to find a fix, however, it’s more important that Congress act wisely, not hastily.  Specifically, the Center for Individual Freedom (“CFIF”) urges Congress to learn from the successes and failures of proposals already passed in various states as it crafts federal legislation.

What follows is a statement by CFIF Senior Vice President of Legal and Public Affairs Timothy Lee on the issue:

“All sides agree that surprise medical billing remains an important issue that Congress must address wisely and without delay.

“The need for resolution does not, however, justify hasty and counterproductive legislation that will only exacerbate the problem for American consumers.  That’s particularly true if a so-called ‘compromise’ bill attempts to split the proverbial baby down the middle by copying California’s misguided approach, which has resulted in higher premiums, a 50% increase in customer complaints and multiple physician office closures.  California’s approach offers a path toward Medicare for All and socialized medicine, not an improvement of the current situation.

"The state of Florida, in contrast, offers a far better solution with proven success.  Florida’s approach offers a more market-based Independent Dispute Resolution (“IDR”) process to protect patients from surprise medical billing, while allowing both medical providers and insurers a voice and opportunity to fairly negotiate on a case-by-case basis using a neutral mediator rather than one-size-fits-all scheme.  Unlike California, Florida’s solution also protects at-risk rural hospitals serving more vulnerable communities.

“The old adage ‘Act in haste, repent at your leisure’ applies here.  The laboratories of democracy already offer examples of what works and what doesn’t on this issue.  Instead of rushing to mimic the mistakes of California, Congress must instead wisely look to the IDR model that has proven so successful in Florida and elsewhere.”

CFIF is a constitutional and free market advocacy organization with over 300,000 supporters and activists nationwide. 

### 

Related Articles :
Question of the Week   
Which one of the following was eulogized as “First in war, first in peace, and first in the hearts of his countrymen”?
More Questions
Quote of the Day   
 
"Incoming Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg has suggested taxing Americans for the number of miles they drive, a policy he endorsed as a Democratic presidential candidate.The Biden Administration is actively searching for ways to fund its ambitious $1 trillion infrastructure plan.Buttigieg, the former mayor of South Bend, Ind., acknowledged 'privacy concerns' related to implementing a vehicle…[more]
 
 
—Nicholas Ballasy, Just the News Senior Correspondent
— Nicholas Ballasy, Just the News Senior Correspondent
 
Liberty Poll   

Would a federally mandated $15 an hour minimum wage have a positive or negative impact on your state's overall economy?