However else one opines on the merits or perils of artificial intelligence (AI), everyone of good faith…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
Record Labels Rightly Sue Abusive AI Music Generators

However else one opines on the merits or perils of artificial intelligence (AI), everyone of good faith can agree that it mustn't become a tool for brazen copyright infringement.  Artists who pour their (sometimes literal) blood, sweat and tears into their creative works shouldn't have those works stolen and exploited by AI bots.

That is particularly true as it relates to AI music generators specifically created for that exploitative purpose.

For that reason, we should all welcome and applaud major record labels for their decisive lawsuit against AI generators Suno and Udio, whom they accuse in their complaints of copyright violation on an "unimaginable scale."

The complaints make for gripping reading unlike most legal filings, but we're not talking here about sampling various songs…[more]

July 02, 2024 • 06:30 PM

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Home Press Room CFIF Leads Coalition Urging Congress to Support the Save Local Business Act
CFIF Leads Coalition Urging Congress to Support the Save Local Business Act Print
Thursday, August 26 2021

ALEXANDRIA, VA – In a letter sent today, a coalition of more than two dozen prominent free-market organizations and individuals, led by the Center for Individual Freedom (CFIF), urged Congress to pass the Save Local Business Act (H.R. 3185/S. 1636).

The Save Local Business Act, which is sponsored by Representative James Comer (R-KY) in the U.S. House and Senator Roger Marshall, M.D. (R-KS) in the U.S. Senate, would restore decades of commonsense labor law norms and protect our nation’s employers against a radical redefinition of the nature of employment that creates uncertainty for struggling businesses across the nation and subjects them to unfair and unreasonable legal liability.

Specifically, the legislation would amend the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) and Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) to restore the definition of “Joint Employer” to businesses that “directly, actually, and immediately exercise significant control over the essential terms and conditions of employment.” 

“Extending federal labor liability requirements to businesses that do not hire, fire, set wages or supervise employees is grossly illogical and unfair,” said CFIF President Jeffrey Mazzella. “The legal uncertainty and compliance burdens resulting from a vague and counterproductive definition of ‘Joint Employer’ implemented during the Obama administration jeopardizes thousands of businesses and hundreds of thousands of jobs.” 

The coalition is urging passage of the Save Local Business Act at a time when some in Congress are pushing the controversial Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO) Act, which would, among other things, make permanent the Obama administration’s confusing and unfair Joint Employer standard.   

“Rather than attempt to make permanent the misguided redefinition of 'Joint Employer' to the detriment of American job creators, Congress should promote business and job growth by passing the Save Local Business Act to restore the commonsense definition that stood for decades,” said Timothy Lee, CFIF’s Senior Vice President of Legal and Public Affairs.  “This coalition is strongly in favor of making sure that happens.”

Read the full letter below or download it here (PDF).

August 26, 2021

Dear Member of Congress,   

On behalf of the undersigned organizations and the millions of members, supporters and activists across America whom we collectively represent, we write to urge your support for the Save Local Business Act (H.R. 3185/S. 1636), which would preserve decades of commonsense labor law norms and protect our nation’s employers against a Biden Administration order that radically redefines the nature of employment to the detriment of struggling businesses across the nation.   

Under longstanding court precedent and National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) interpretation, an "employer" for purposes of applying the nation's labor laws is generally defined to include only those businesses that determine the essential terms and conditions of employment. As a textbook illustration, imagine a franchise arrangement whereby the franchisee determines whom to hire, whom to fire, wages and other everyday working conditions.  The distant franchisor, in contrast, obviously cannot interview every potential franchisee employee, make each individual hiring decision or micromanage its franchisees' working conditions.  

That’s precisely why an appellate court ruled in NLRB v. Browning-Ferris Industries (1982) that the appropriate standard for defining “employer” was established by the U.S. Supreme Court in Boire v. Greyhound Corp. (1964).  Specifically, it held that only businesses exercising control over "those matters governing the essential terms and conditions of employment" were subject to collective bargaining requirements and liabilities.  Two years later, the NLRB formally adopted that standard, ruling in separate cases that "there must be a showing that the employer meaningfully affects matters relating to the employment such as hiring, firing, discipline, supervision and direction."  In other words, an "employer" for purposes of labor law requires direct and immediate control over the terms and conditions of employment.  

That stands to reason, since it makes no sense to impose legal liability upon employers that don't actually control a bargaining unit's employment conditions.   

In August 2015, however, the Obama Administration’s NLRB suddenly and needlessly upended that established legal standard by imposing what's known as the "Joint Employer Doctrine."  The Joint Employer Doctrine means that multiple businesses could now be held legally liable for the same employee.  Under that radical departure from logic and established law, even employers with indirect or even merely potential ability to affect employment terms could suddenly find themselves subject to federal labor law mandates.   

That instantly jeopardized hundreds of thousands of franchise businesses across America and the millions of people they employ, and constituted a gift to union bosses and liberal politicians who receive union campaign donations.  With union membership declining and their ability to influence elections progressively waning, they're desperate for methods to retain power and dollars.  

In 2020, the NLRB formally rejected the Obama Administration attempt to redefine the law.  Today, however, the Biden Administration seeks to reverse field yet again and reimpose the chaotic Joint Employer Rule of the Obama Administration NLRB.   

That's why the Save Local Business Act is of such immediate importance.  It would rightly define “joint employers” as those that “directly, actually, and immediately exercise significant control over the essential terms and conditions of employment.”  Today, hundreds of thousands of franchise enterprises exist in the United States, accounting for nearly 7.6 million jobs.  And according to an American Action Forum study, the Joint Employer Rule could reduce private sector employment by nearly 2 million jobs, including 500,000 in the leisure and hospitality industry alone.  In addition to the direct impact of jobs lost, that also translates to taxpayer pain in the form of more unemployment payments, Medicaid enrollment and other forms of government assistance.   

The Save Local Business Act would spare those employers and employees the Biden NLRB's attempted joint employer redefinition, and preserve established judicial and NLRB precedent by subjecting only actual employers exercising direct and immediate control over the essential terms and conditions of employment to federal collective bargaining liabilities.   

It’s grossly unfair and illogical for the Biden Administration to extend federal labor requirements to businesses that do not hire, fire, set wages or supervise employees, and it jeopardizes thousands of businesses and potentially millions of American jobs. Congress can take an easy and important step toward improving economic and employment conditions by passing the Save Local Business Act.  Accordingly, we urge you to support H.R. 3185 and S. 1636, the Save Local Business Act.   

Thank you very much for your attention to this critical matter.   


Jeffrey Mazzella
Center for Individual Freedom  
Grover Norquist
Americans for Tax Reform 
Bethany Marcum
Alaska Policy Forum
Steve Pociask
President / CEO
American Consumer Institute
Brent Wm. Gardner
Chief Government Affairs Officer
Americans for Prosperity
Ryan Ellis
Center for a Free Economy
Andrew F. Quinlan
Center for Freedom and Prosperity
Iain Murray
Vice President for Strategy
Competitive Enterprise Institute
Matthew Kandrach
Consumer Action for a Strong Economy
Tom Schatz
Council for Citizens Against Government Waste
Adam Brandon
George Landrith
Frontiers of Freedom
Garrett Bess
Vice President
Heritage Action for America
Mario H. Lopez
Hispanic Leadership Fund
Heather R. Higgins
Independent Women's Voice
Andrew Langer
Institute for Liberty
Seton Motley
Less Government
Charles Sauer
Market Institute
Pete Sepp
National Taxpayers Union
Robert Fellner
Vice President
Nevada Policy Research Institute
Tom Hebert
Executive Director
Open Competition Center
Karen Kerrigan
President & CEO
Small Business & Entrepreneurship Council
David Williams
Taxpayers Protection Alliance
Daniel Garza
The Libre Initiative
James L. Martin
60 Plus Association
Saulius “Saul” Anuzis
60 Plus Association
Mark Harmsworth
Director, Center for Small Business
Washington Policy Center
Related Articles :
Notable Quote   
"Of all the words uttered since Donald Trump was nearly felled by an assassin's bullet and tragedy struck his rally in Pennsylvania, the most profound came from his wife, the former First Lady Melania Trump.The words she wrote a few hours after watching 'that violent bullet strike my husband' met this spiritual moment when madness is afoot and the world seems more dangerous than ever.You could hear…[more]
— Miranda Devine, New York Post
Liberty Poll   

Will President Biden be the 2024 Democratic candidate for president following the Democratic National Convention in August?