We at CFIF often highlight the clear and present danger that drug price control schemes pose to American…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
New Lung Cancer Breakthrough Illustrates the Potential Peril of Drug Price Controls

We at CFIF often highlight the clear and present danger that drug price control schemes pose to American consumers, who benefit from our private pharmaceutical sector that leads the world - by far - in innovation.  A new lung cancer treatment breakthrough in the form of Amgen's Lumakras illustrates that interrelationship.

Simply put, Lumakras reduced the risk of progression by 34% compared to chemotherapy in patents with advanced lung cancer, which is particularly welcome considering lung cancer's especially low survival rate (18.6% over five years, and just 5% for advanced forms).  The breakthrough required years of research and enormous amounts of investment, however, which The Wall Street Journal notes makes Lumakras the type of innovation put at risk by new drug price controls…[more]

September 22, 2022 • 05:06 PM

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Jester's Courtroom Legal tales stranger than stranger than fiction: Ridiculous and sometimes funny lawsuits plaguing our courts
Home Press Room CFIF Urges U.S. Senate to Reject DISCLOSE Act
CFIF Urges U.S. Senate to Reject DISCLOSE Act Print
Tuesday, September 20 2022

The Honorable Mitch McConnell
Republican Leader
United States Senate
Washington, D.C. 20510   

Dear Leader McConnell:  

On behalf of the Center for Individual Freedom (hereinafter “CFIF”) and over 300,000 supporters and activists across the nation, I write in strongest opposition to the so-called “Democracy Is Strengthened by Casting Light on Spending in Elections Act of 2022” (DISCLOSE Act).  The proposed legislation would do nothing to improve our electoral process, but would instead violate Americans’ First Amendment freedoms of speech, association and to petition government for redress of grievances.  

Indeed, that appears to be the very point of the DISCLOSE Act:  to publicly expose American citizens and nonprofit organizations for their political beliefs and the causes they support by requiring them to report private contributions to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) or other bureaucracies, thereby chilling our First Amendment freedoms as a society.

As demonstrated by a recent coalition letter, this is a matter on which conservative and libertarian organizations and their millions of supporters across the nation stand united in opposition.  

Unfortunately, this sort of attempt to expose and persecute Americans for their political beliefs and private contributions possesses a long and sordid history.  In 1958, a unanimous U.S.  Supreme Court condemned the practice in a decision involving segregationist state government efforts to access identifying information on supporters of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) in NAACP v. Alabama.  The Court rightfully recognized that forcing the NAACP to surrender its membership rolls to antagonistic government officials or vindictive members of the general public would threaten members' safety and the organization's very existence: 

This Court has recognized the vital relationship between freedom to associate and privacy in one's associations.  Compelled disclosure of membership in an organization engaged in advocacy of particular beliefs is of the same order.  Inviolability of privacy in group association may in many circumstances be indispensable to preservation of freedom of association, particularly where a group espouses dissident beliefs.  

More recently, rogue IRS officials like Lois Lerner have targeted organizations and donors whose viewpoints they find objectionable.  Similarly, state attorneys general have sought access to donor and membership information, so that they could harass and silence groups and their supporters.  

Moreover, the potential threat isn't limited to malfeasant government officials, whether at the federal, state or local levels.  As just one recent example, this month alone the IRS admitted that it exposed and posted confidential information involving approximately 120,000 taxpayers.  Across the nation, people have been terminated from employment, stalked at their homes and had their workplaces picketed merely because they supported causes that someone out there detested. 

That sort of harassment is only possible when government forcibly collects and retains information identifying people for the beliefs they support.  

The DISCLOSE Act would do exactly that.  It won’t bring more honest, more informed, more secure or more robust elections or democratic debate.  It will merely sacrifice the privacy of American citizens, and our First Amendment rights will be weakened through intimidation and overregulation.  We therefore urge you in the strongest possible terms to oppose this unconstitutional and dangerous legislation.  

Thank you very much for your attention to this important matter, and please contact me at your convenience with any questions or comments.  

Sincerely,
/s/
Timothy Lee
Senior Vice President of Legal and Public Affairs  

cc: United States Senators

Related Articles :
Quiz Question   
Which one of the following U.S. Presidents signed the executive order establishing the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)?
More Questions
Notable Quote   
 
"On December 15, 2021, President Biden released an Executive Order related to global drug trade and stated, 'I find that international drug trafficking -- including the illicit production, global sale, and widespread distribution of illegal drugs; the rise of extremely potent drugs such as fentanyl and other synthetic opioids -- constitutes an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security…[more]
 
 
—Derek Maltz, a Retired Director of the Drug Enforcement Administration's Special Operations Division
— Derek Maltz, a Retired Director of the Drug Enforcement Administration's Special Operations Division
 
Liberty Poll   

Choosing from the list below, what issue is currently most important to you heading into the mid-term elections?