Democrats hope to press the "affordability" issue in this year's midterm election season, but there'…
CFIF on X CFIF on YouTube
Inflation: Comparing Trump and Biden...

Democrats hope to press the "affordability" issue in this year's midterm election season, but there's one potentially glaring problem for them, as illustrated by our friends at Unleash Prosperity...

[caption id="" align="alignleft" width="668"] Biden Versus Trump on Inflation[/caption]

 …[more]

August 17, 2026 • 04:40 PM
Home Press Room CFIF Reiterates Support for Federal NO FAKES Act
CFIF Reiterates Support for Federal NO FAKES Act Print
Tuesday, May 20 2025

WASHINGTON, DC – The Center for Individual Freedom (CFIF) today reiterates strong support for the “Nurture Originals, Foster Art, and Keep Entertainment Safe” (NO FAKES) Act.  

The bipartisan legislation, sponsored by U.S. Senators Marsha Blackburn (R-TN), Thom Tillis (R-NC), Chris Coons (D-CT) and Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), and joined by Representatives Maria Salazar (R-FL) and Madeline Dean (D-PA) in the U.S. House, would protect the voice and visual likenesses of artists across the music, film, television and other industries, as well as other individuals, from “deepfakes” and other unauthorized digital replicas. 

With the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee scheduled to hold a hearing on the NO FAKES Act this week, CFIF President Jeffrey Mazzella issued the following statement further explaining the importance of the legislation:  

“Generative artificial intelligence (AI) is quickly becoming an increasingly prevalent part of society and our economy, which presents the possibility of both significant benefits and extreme peril.  Whatever one’s opinion of the competing costs and benefits of AI, however, all can agree that it must not become a method to steal from artists and other individuals by appropriating their images, voices or other likenesses for improper gain.  

“Artists of every discipline invest enormous amounts of time, talent and financial resources to create their works.  Accordingly, it’s unfair to have those works violated and appropriated by AI for others’ exploitative purposes without approval and fair compensation.  

“Unauthorized AI deepfakes and other digital replicas threaten small, emerging and struggling artists and other individuals most, because they don’t possess the revenue or power to overcome their losses or vindicate their rights via the legal process.  

“The NO FAKES Act is carefully crafted legislation that will both protect against deepfakes and other digital replicas while at the same time providing important First Amendment safeguards for categories of storytelling such as biopics, docudramas, parodies and satires.

“The bipartisan NO FAKES Act has attracted the support of a broad range of stakeholders as it appropriately addresses an emerging threat. Congress should move without delay to pass it.”

###

Related Articles :
Notable Quote   
 
"The U.S. Supreme Court will kick off its 2026 term next week with what will be one of its biggest cases of the year. And according to several legal specialists, there's much more to the dispute than meets the eye.The case in question is Suncor v. Boulder, which deals with the lawfare that Boulder, Colorado, launched against Suncor Energy companies and the Exxon Mobil Corporation. The city is seeking…[more]
 
 
— Shawn Fleetwood, Teh Federalist
 
Liberty Poll   

Based on the meteoric development of AI, do you believe that your job is going to be threatened or enhanced?