Gallup just released a new survey summary under the sobering headline "Americans Sour on U.S. Healthcare…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
Gallup Poll Shows Americans' Views on U.S. Healthcare Quality Turned Downward with ObamaCare and More Government Control

Gallup just released a new survey summary under the sobering headline "Americans Sour on U.S. Healthcare Quality," but what's perhaps most notable is when the distinctive downturn began -- as ObamaCare took effect and government control over our healthcare increased significantly:

[embed]https://datawrapper.dwcdn.net/LGfkD/4/#[/embed]

 …[more]

January 31, 2023 • 04:20 PM

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Jester's Courtroom Legal tales stranger than stranger than fiction: Ridiculous and sometimes funny lawsuits plaguing our courts
Press Releases
CFIF Urges Support of the American Music Fairness Act Print E-mail
Tuesday, December 06 2022

In a letter sent today to members of the House Judiciary Committee, the Center for Individual Freedom ("CFIF") reiterated its support of H.R. 4130, the American Music Fairness Act.  

Read the entire letter below.


December 2, 2022

United States House of Representatives
Committee on the Judiciary 
2138 Rayburn House Office Building 
Washington, D.C.  20515 

Dear House Committee on the Judiciary Members and Staff:  

On behalf of the Center for Individual Freedom (hereinafter “CFIF”) and over 300,000 supporters and activists across the nation, I write in support of H.R. 4130, the American Music Fairness Act.  

Since America’s founding, intellectual property protections have provided the foundation for our nation’s unmatched innovation, prosperity and growth.  Our Founding Fathers specifically crafted Article I, Section 8 to grant Congress the authority “To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries.”  They knew that innovation is critical to economic growth and quality of life, and that the only way to fully encourage innovation is to reward and protect it.  

As a direct result, from the first days of the phonograph, through the jazz age, through the rock era, through disco, through country, through hip-hop and every other popular musical iteration since its advent, it’s not by accident that we lead the world in the same manner in which we lead in such industries as cinema and television programming.  We can thank our nation’s emphasis on strong copyright protections.  America’s legacy of unparalleled copyright protection and free market orientation have cultivated a music industry unrivaled in today’s world or throughout human history.  

Unfortunately, federal law regarding performing artists’ rights currently fails to uphold that legacy.  

Specifically, existing law secures royalty payments for songwriters and others when their songs are played on AM-FM terrestrial radio, but not for the performing artists themselves.  Deepening that odd paradox, performance artists receive compensation when their songs play on digital broadcast platforms like the internet, satellite and cable.  Terrestrial radio broadcasters, however, somehow remain exempt under existing law from having to pay that same compensation.  There’s no logical or legal justification for that paradox, which amounts to crony capitalism in the form of a special government carve-out.  

The American Music Fairness Act would finally correct that anomaly and secure performance rights for artists whose recordings are played on terrestrial radio (with exceptions maintained for smaller “mom-and-pop” stations).  In 2021, we at CFIF joined numerous fellow conservative and libertarian organizations in a coalition letter to the House amplifying the need to pass this legislation to protect artists’ natural intellectual property (IP) rights:  

The Constitution protects intellectual property rights and specifically delegates to Congress authority to protect creative works.  Artists who produce music therefore have the right to protect their intellectual property, including both the writer and performer of a given recording.  When a given work is transmitted, common sense and basic fairness dictate that the medium of transmission should not affect the existence of these rights.  Yet, under the current regime, a performer does not hold effective or enforceable rights to his or her product when it is distributed through terrestrial radio.  

Opponents of the American Music Fairness Act illogically suggest that it would somehow introduce needless market regulation, but the obvious reality is that the market is already regulated in the discriminatory manner described above.  The American Music Fairness Act would merely level the playing field and respect the value of the artists’ works.  

Opponents of H.R. 4130 also falsely attempt to portray it as creating a “tax.”  That is simply inaccurate.  Whereas taxes are compulsory payments to government, royalties are voluntary payments to broadcast others’ creations.  This bill relates to royalties, not taxes.  

By any standard of fairness and logic, performing artists possess a natural right to enjoy the fruits of their labor and creativity, just like any of us do for our work.  After all, artists already receive performance payments from non-terrestrial radio stations, reflecting the value of their work.  The American Music Fairness Act simply corrects an unfair and illogical federal carve-out.  

Accordingly, we urge you to support this long-overdue legislation.  Thank you very much for your attention to this important matter, and please contact me at your convenience with any questions or comments.  

Sincerely,  
/s/
Timothy Lee 
Senior Vice President of Legal and Public Affairs 
 
 


Page 2 of 243
Quiz Question   
In what year did Congress pass the Uniform Monday Holiday Bill?
More Questions
Notable Quote   
 
"Every Republican senator and Democrat Joe Manchin are introducing legislation that they hope will terminate the Biden administration's new environment, social and governance (ESG) rule, which they say 'politicizes' the retirement savings for 152 million Americans.The Biden administration's Department of Labor unveiled a rule in November, set to go into effect on Jan. 30, that allows retirement plan…[more]
 
 
—Kelly Laco, Fox News
— Kelly Laco, Fox News
 
Liberty Poll   

Although early in Kevin McCarthy's tenure as House Speaker, how would you grade him on his performance thus far?