As the U.S. economy shows sudden weakness, American consumers understandably express increasing anxiety…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
Elizabeth Warren Prepares to Punish the U.S. Economy and Investors with Her Misnamed "Stop Wall Street Looting Act"

As the U.S. economy shows sudden weakness, American consumers understandably express increasing anxiety.  A troubling new Gallup survey reports that economic confidence has now declined to lows unsurpassed since the early days of the Covid pandemic in 2020.

Undeterred by that accumulating weakness and alarm, however, Senator Elizabeth Warren (D - Massachusetts) appears restless to strike yet another dangerous hammer blow by re-introducing her misnamed "Stop Wall Street Looting Act."

She may think that title can conceal the bill's danger, but Americans and elected officials mustn't be fooled or invite the potentially catastrophic economic peril.

Senator Warren’s bill includes significant tax increases, as well as new legal liabilities and bureaucratic regulations on U.S. investment…[more]

October 18, 2021 • 01:48 PM

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Press Releases
Coalition Urges Common Sense on Broadband Infrastructure Spending, Not Policies That Will Needlessly Waste Taxpayer Dollars and Prioritize Government-Controlled Internet Print E-mail
Monday, July 26 2021

The Center for Individual Freedom (CFIF) last week joined a coalition of more than 30 free-market organizations and individuals on a letter to Congress advocating “specifically against proposals that would enact price controls, dramatically expand agency authority, and prioritize government-controlled internet.”

The letter, which was organized by American for Tax Reform’s Digital Liberty, can be read below or viewed here (PDF).


July 23, 2021

RE: Broadband Infrastructure Spending

Dear Senators:

We write to you today over some concerning developments in the bipartisan infrastructure negotiations on broadband. We are guided by the principles of limited government and believe that the flaws in the infrastructure framework go well beyond the issues discussed here. Nonetheless, our present aim is to advocate specifically against proposals that would enact price controls, dramatically expand agency authority, and prioritize government-controlled internet. 

The infrastructure plan should not include rate regulation of broadband services. Congress should not authorize any federal or governmental body to set the price of any broadband offering. Even steps that open the door to rate regulation of broadband services will prove harmful in the long run.  

Nor should Congress continue to abdicate its oversight responsibilities to executive branch agencies like the National Telecommunications and Information Administration. Giving NTIA unchecked authority to modify or waive requirements, renders all guardrails placed by Congress meaningless. There must be oversight of the programs to ensure that taxpayer dollars go toward connecting more Americans to broadband as opposed to wasteful pet projects. 

Historically, attempts by NTIA to close the digital divide through discretionary grants have failed, leading to wasteful overbuilds, corruption, and improper expenditures. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 created the $4 billion Broadband Technology Opportunities Program (BTOP) grant program administered by NTIA. From 2009, when BTOP was instituted, to 2017, at least one-third of all the reports made by the Inspector General for the Department of Commerce were related to the BTOP program, and census data showed that the BTOP program had no positive effect on broadband adoption. And this was with only $4 billion in taxpayer dollars. We cannot afford to make the same mistake with much greater sums.

Legislation must be clear and not create ambiguities that are left to the whims of regulators. While “digital redlining” is unacceptable, the FCC should not be allowed to define the term however it sees fit and promulgate any regulations it thinks will solve problems—real or imagined. Doing so would give the agency carte blanche to regulate and micromanage broadband in any way it desires. This would be an egregious expansion of FCC authority. Moreover, definitions and regulations could change whenever party control of the agency changes, leading to a back-and-forth that creates uncertainty for consumers and businesses. 

Legitimate desire to ensure that low-income Americans have access to broadband infrastructure should not be used as a smokescreen to codify aspects of the recent Executive Order on Competition, which should not be included in any bipartisan infrastructure agreement. Republicans fought hard to support the FCC’s Restoring Internet Freedom Order. Any legislating on the functions and deployment of Internet technologies must move as a standalone bill through regular order with committee review. These questions are far too important to shoehorn into a massive bill without rigorous debate.   

Any funding for broadband buildout must target locations without any broadband connection first, and this should be determined by the Congressionally mandated FCC broadband maps. Congress has oversight over the FCC and the FCC has already conducted several reverse auctions. Reverse auctions get the most out of each taxpayer dollar towards closing the digital divide. Areas where there is already a commitment from a carrier to build out a network, should not be considered for grants, and the NTIA should not be able to override the FCC’s map to redefine “unserved” and subsidize duplicative builds.  

Government-controlled Internet should not be prioritized in any grant program. With few exceptions, government-owned networks (GONs) have been abject failures. For example, KentuckyWired is a 3,000-mile GON that was sold to taxpayers as a $350 million project that would be complete by spring of 2016. Those projections could not have been more wrong.   More than five years past the supposed completion date, fiber construction for KentuckyWired is still “in progress” in some parts of the state and a report from the state auditor has concluded that taxpayers will end up wasting a whopping $1.5 billion on this redundant “government owned network” over its 30-year life. NTIA should certainly not encourage these failures to be replicated.

We appreciate your work to help close the digital divide and agree that access to reliable internet is a priority, however we should not use this need to serve as a cover for unnecessary government expansion. Please feel free to reach out to any of the undersigned organizations or individuals should you have questions or comments. 

Regards,

Grover G. Norquist
President
Americans for Tax Reform
 
Jennifer Huddleston*
Director of Technology & Innovation Policy
American Action Forum
 
Phil Kerpen
President
American Commitment
 
Krisztina Pusok, Ph. D.
Director
American Consumer Institute
Center for Citizen Research
 
Brent Wm. Gardner
Chief Government Affairs Officer
Americans for Prosperity
 
Jeffrey Mazzella
President
Center for Individual Freedom
 
Andrew F. Quinlan
President
Center for Freedom and Prosperity
 
Jessica Melugin
Director Center for Technology and Innovation
Competitive Enterprise Institute
 
Matthew Kandrach
President
Consumer Action for a Strong Economy
 
Roslyn Layton, PhD
Founder
China Tech Threat
 
Ashley Baker
Director of Public Policy
The Committee for Justice
 
Tom Schatz
President
Council for Citizens Against Government Waste
 
Katie McAuliffe
Executive Director
Digital Liberty
 
Adam Brandon
President
FreedomWorks
 
George Landrith
President
Frontiers of Freedom
 
Garrett Bess
Vice President
Heritage Action for America
 
Carrie Lukas
President
Independent Women’s Forum
 
Heather Higgins
CEO
Independent Women’s Voice
 
Bartlett Cleland
Executive Director
Innovation Economy Alliance
 
Tom Giovanetti
President
Institute for Policy Innovation
 
Seton Motley
President
Less Government
 
Matthew Gagnon
Chief Executive Officer
Maine Policy Institute
 
Matthew Nicaud
Tech Policy Specialist
Mississippi Center for Public Policy
 
Brandon Arnold
Executive Vice President
National Taxpayers Union
 
Tom Hebert
Executive Director
Open Competition Center
 
Eric Peterson
Director
Pelican Center for Technology and Innovation
 
Lorenzo Montanari
Executive Director
Property Rights Alliance
 
Jeffrey Westling
Resident Fellow, Technology & Innovation Policy
R Street Institute
 
James L. Martin
Founder/Chairman
60 Plus Association
 
Saulius “Saul” Anuzis
President60
Plus Association
 
David Williams
President
Taxpayers Protection Alliance
 
* individual signer; organization listed for identification purposes only
 
 


Page 2 of 229
Quiz Question   
In which century were the first mandatory vaccination laws enacted in the United States?
More Questions
Notable Quote   
 
"At the end of last week, there were 584 container ships idling off the world's ports, waiting to be loaded or unloaded. Disruptions in the bulk cargo sector look to be even worse.Experts suggest the problems are temporary. For instance, Bloomberg columnist Brooke Sutherland maintains that three weeks of declines in ocean freight rates tells us 'the worst may be over for the supply-chain snarls that…[more]
 
 
—Gordon G. Chang, Author of "The Coming Collapse of China"
— Gordon G. Chang, Author of "The Coming Collapse of China"
 
Liberty Poll   

Which is the current greatest day-to-day concern to your family?