What was once a decades-long dream became reality during the Trump Administration, as the U.S. finally…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
Image of the Day: Biden's "Make America an Energy Importer Again" Presidency

What was once a decades-long dream became reality during the Trump Administration, as the U.S. finally became an energy exporter again.  As Laffer Associates highlights, Joe Biden has inexplicably put that into reverse gear, and now gas prices are on their way back up.  This is progress?

[caption id="" align="aligncenter" width="519"] Joe Biden's Reverse-Midas Touch on Energy[/caption]

 …[more]

October 05, 2022 • 06:10 PM

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Jester's Courtroom Legal tales stranger than stranger than fiction: Ridiculous and sometimes funny lawsuits plaguing our courts
Press Releases
CFIF Urges U.S. Senate to Reject DISCLOSE Act Print E-mail
Tuesday, September 20 2022

The Honorable Mitch McConnell
Republican Leader
United States Senate
Washington, D.C. 20510   

Dear Leader McConnell:  

On behalf of the Center for Individual Freedom (hereinafter “CFIF”) and over 300,000 supporters and activists across the nation, I write in strongest opposition to the so-called “Democracy Is Strengthened by Casting Light on Spending in Elections Act of 2022” (DISCLOSE Act).  The proposed legislation would do nothing to improve our electoral process, but would instead violate Americans’ First Amendment freedoms of speech, association and to petition government for redress of grievances.  

Indeed, that appears to be the very point of the DISCLOSE Act:  to publicly expose American citizens and nonprofit organizations for their political beliefs and the causes they support by requiring them to report private contributions to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) or other bureaucracies, thereby chilling our First Amendment freedoms as a society.

As demonstrated by a recent coalition letter, this is a matter on which conservative and libertarian organizations and their millions of supporters across the nation stand united in opposition.  

Unfortunately, this sort of attempt to expose and persecute Americans for their political beliefs and private contributions possesses a long and sordid history.  In 1958, a unanimous U.S.  Supreme Court condemned the practice in a decision involving segregationist state government efforts to access identifying information on supporters of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) in NAACP v. Alabama.  The Court rightfully recognized that forcing the NAACP to surrender its membership rolls to antagonistic government officials or vindictive members of the general public would threaten members' safety and the organization's very existence: 

This Court has recognized the vital relationship between freedom to associate and privacy in one's associations.  Compelled disclosure of membership in an organization engaged in advocacy of particular beliefs is of the same order.  Inviolability of privacy in group association may in many circumstances be indispensable to preservation of freedom of association, particularly where a group espouses dissident beliefs.  

More recently, rogue IRS officials like Lois Lerner have targeted organizations and donors whose viewpoints they find objectionable.  Similarly, state attorneys general have sought access to donor and membership information, so that they could harass and silence groups and their supporters.  

Moreover, the potential threat isn't limited to malfeasant government officials, whether at the federal, state or local levels.  As just one recent example, this month alone the IRS admitted that it exposed and posted confidential information involving approximately 120,000 taxpayers.  Across the nation, people have been terminated from employment, stalked at their homes and had their workplaces picketed merely because they supported causes that someone out there detested. 

That sort of harassment is only possible when government forcibly collects and retains information identifying people for the beliefs they support.  

The DISCLOSE Act would do exactly that.  It won’t bring more honest, more informed, more secure or more robust elections or democratic debate.  It will merely sacrifice the privacy of American citizens, and our First Amendment rights will be weakened through intimidation and overregulation.  We therefore urge you in the strongest possible terms to oppose this unconstitutional and dangerous legislation.  

Thank you very much for your attention to this important matter, and please contact me at your convenience with any questions or comments.  

Sincerely,
/s/
Timothy Lee
Senior Vice President of Legal and Public Affairs  

cc: United States Senators

 


Page 2 of 240
Quiz Question   
How many times in U.S. history has Congress changed the number of justices comprising the U.S. Supreme Court?
More Questions
Notable Quote   
 
"House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D., Calif.) has seen her net worth increase by $140 million since the 2008 financial crisis thanks in no small part to her husband's fortuitous trades in companies she has worked to subsidize. Now, she's rying to pull up the ladder behind her: In what may be her final months as a member of Congress, she's backing a proposal that would prohibit her colleagues from buying…[more]
 
 
—Andrew Kerr, The Washington Free Beacon
— Andrew Kerr, The Washington Free Beacon
 
Liberty Poll   

Choosing from the list below, what issue is currently most important to you heading into the mid-term elections?