|
61 |
Court Blocks D.C. Gun Law, Vindicating Right to Bear Arms Beyond the Home
This week, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit — often labeled the nation's second-highest court — secured a significant victory for the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms.
At issue in Wrenn v. District of Columbia was the following question: Can the government require citizens to demonstrate… |
62 |
Supreme Court Botches 2nd Amendment Opportunity, But Congress Poised to Act
This week, the Supreme Court blew a critical opportunity to interrupt the ongoing assault by states like California against Second Amendment rights.
Scratch that. Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Anthony Kennedy and Samuel Alito, all of whom joined the landmark D.C. v. Heller majority affirming the individual right to keep and bear… |
63 |
Making Courts Great Again: Trump Nominates 10 More Conservative Judges
Conservatives can breathe another sigh of relief.
Throughout the 2016 presidential campaign, liberal scolds and Donald Trump skeptics assured the American electorate that he couldn't possibly reach the White House, and even if he somehow did, he would cruelly cast aside promises to govern as a conservative and nominate conservative judges in… |
64 |
Gorsuch Signals Even Broader 2nd Amendment Interpretation Than Scalia
This week offered conservatives and libertarians a delightful spectacle in Judge Neil Gorsuch's testimony during Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation hearings on his nomination to replace the late Justice Antonin Scalia on the U.S. Supreme Court.
Gorsuch performed so brilliantly, and his antagonist Judiciary Committee liberals performed so… |
65 |
Chuck Schumer's Attacks on Neil Gorsuch Are Un-American
If Democrats want to filibuster President Donald Trump's Supreme Court nominee, they're entitled to do it. In fact, Democrats are free to try and stop federal appeals court Judge Neil Gorsuch's confirmation for any reason they desire, whether ideological or personal, or even no particular reason at all. There is nothing in the Constitution that compels… |
66 |
The Contradictory Logic of Gun-Grabbers
A little intellectual integrity is apparently too much to ask of Second Amendment restrictionists.
Witness the ever-shifting and contradictory legal rationalizations in their unrelenting campaign to infringe upon Americans' right to keep and bear arms, as convenience and changing circumstance dictate.
Last week, the Fourth Circuit Court… |
67 |
Judge Robart's National Security Expertise
Judge James Robart, of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington State, believes there is no basis for President Trump's executive order temporarily suspending non-American entry from seven terrorism-plagued countries.
In court last week, Robart questioned Justice Department lawyer Michelle Bennett about the administration's decision… |
68 |
Supreme Court: Gorsuch May Go Beyond Scalia
During last year's presidential campaign, Donald Trump assured wary voters that, "I am looking to appoint judges very much in the mold of Justice Scalia."
From that point forward, the question of whether the distinctively mercurial Trump could be trusted to adhere to his promise remained a matter of frequent debate.
This week… |
69 |
Battle Lines Forming in War Over Trump Court
Opening shots are being fired over Donald Trump's anticipated Supreme Court nomination. A conservative advocacy group is running television ads urging Trump to appoint a justice in the mold of the late Antonin Scalia. New Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer fires back that Democrats will try to block any nominee who isn't "mainstream."… |
70 |
Liberal Opponents of Free Speech Suffer Another Humiliating Supreme Court Defeat
Imagine the following harrowing scenario.
In the predawn hours one morning, you and your family are jarred from your sleep by a deafening pounding at your front door. Naturally disoriented, you peer out your window to the bewildering sight of multiple police vehicles, blinding lights flashing, with your neighbors gawking from their doorsteps… |
71 |
No, "Stop and Frisk" Isn't Unconstitutional
In alarming news this week, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) announced that murders in the United States soared an astonishing 10.8% just last year.
That same day, "stop and frisk" and similar police techniques achieved sudden prominence after Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton clashed during their first debate.
To her… |
72 |
Another Judicial Setback for Obama, IRS
Leveraging federal authorities like the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to persecute political opponents stands among the most grave abuses that officials can commit, as Richard Nixon learned the hard way four decades ago.
This month, an Obama Administration and IRS attempt to evade legal reckoning for their own admitted abuses suffered a stinging… |
73 |
Hillarygate: FBI Director's Factual Conclusions Match Applicable Federal Statute
Did Hillary Clinton violate federal law by using an unsecured personal email system as Secretary of State?
That question generated intense commentary this week. Because of the inherent political implications, however, most commentaries unfortunately generated more heat than light.
It's therefore worth highlighting the applicable… |
74 |
The Fraud Goes On
Last week the Supreme Court of the United States voted that President Obama exceeded his authority when he granted exemptions from the immigration laws passed by Congress.
But the Supreme Court also exceeded its own authority by granting the University of Texas an exemption from the Constitution's requirement of "equal protection of the laws,&… |
75 |
Democrats: We Will Overcome the Constitution
Nothing stirs the passions of Democrats these days quite like the prospect of gutting the Constitution. In an unprecedented act of pretend political bravery, House members held a catered sit-in, demanding that Republicans allow a vote to strip away protections of Second, Fifth and Sixth Amendments of the Constitution. It was quite the scene.
There… |
76 |
Climate Alarmists Finding Themselves on the Other End of Judicial System
Throughout my legal career, I've always favored what is known as the "English Rule," meaning that losing litigants should generally be required to pay the winning parties' fees and costs.
Under our current "American Rule," in contrast, each side generally pays its own fees and costs, win or lose. That has always struck… |
77 |
The Liberal Case Against Peter Thiel is the Worst Kind of Hypocrisy
We recently discovered that Peter Thiel, the libertarian billionaire co-founder of PayPal and early investor in Facebook, bankrolled wrestler Hulk Hogan's lawsuits against the blog network Gawker Media.
Now, as someone who considers himself a near-absolutist on free speech, I'm open to hearing arguments for why we need tort reform in these sorts of… |
78 |
Two More Legal Victories for Second Amendment
This week, two high-profile political events refocused Americans' attention on the judicial branch.
Also this week, two new legal victories for Second Amendment rights remind us why it matters.
First, Donald Trump released his much-anticipated list of potential U.S. Supreme Court nominees, which conservative and libertarian judicial observers… |
79 |
Court Halts Liberal Campaign to Intimidate Conservative Donors
Throughout American history, our First Amendment freedoms of speech and association have frequently demanded the security of anonymity.
Without that protective anonymity, Americans seeking to bring about political change or introduce politically incorrect opinions into the marketplace of ideas risk persecution by government officials or public… |
80 |
Federal Court Humiliates IRS in Conservative Groups' Lawsuit
Americans outraged by Obama Administration and Internal Revenue Service (IRS) efforts to target and persecute conservative organizations just received a spring gift from the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals.
By way of refresher, thousands of private organizations each year - charities, churches, political organizations, schools and other groups… |
81 |
Supreme Court Vacancy: Follow the (Original) Obama-Biden-Reid Rule
In May 2005, Senator Harry Reid (D - Nevada) unequivocally renounced any Senate obligation to even vote on President George W. Bush's nominations, let alone confirm them, even though he had won reelection just months earlier:
"The duties of the Senate are set forth in the U.S. Constitution. Nowhere in that document does it say… |
82 |
With a Court Ruling Unlikely, States Still Hold the Key to Checking Union Power
Justice Antonin Scalia’s death last month was a terrible loss for the U.S. Supreme Court and for the country. Scalia was one of the sharpest minds ever to sit on the High Court. And he was one of three reliably originalist votes on the court (the other two being Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito). His replacement, whomever it may be, will pale… |
83 |
Republicans Shouldn't Fear a SCOTUS Fight
Republicans need to ask themselves a couple of questions before they battle over Barack Obama's eventual nominee to replace Justice Antonin Scalia on the Supreme Court. Is there any good reason to allow this president to change the ideological composition the Supreme Court radically? What is the political downside of denying him?
For one thing, despite… |
84 |
Constitutional Text and History Favor Senate Republicans on Scalia Vacancy, Not Obama
"The President ... shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the Supreme Court...." —United States Constitution, Article II, Section 2, Clause 2
In the deepening partisan dispute over the U.S. Supreme Court vacancy following Justice… |
85 |
Democrats' Big Lie About the Supreme Court
Democrats are giddy over the prospect of President Obama replacing conservative Justice Antonin Scalia with a liberal.
But Republicans are equally adamant about blocking Obama's lame-duck appointment. "This vacancy should not be filled until we have a new president," says Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell.
It's rare that a president… |
86 |
Federal Court Deals Obama Administration Another Humiliating Defeat
This was an embarrassing week for the Obama Administration on two separate but interrelated fronts.
In Mexico, a powerful weapon capable of taking down a helicopter, which was obtained through Obama's "Operation Fast and Furious" debacle, was discovered in the cache of Mexico's notorious drug kingpin and prison escapee Joaquin "… |
87 |
A First Amendment Reckoning for Teachers Unions
If the First Amendment’s guarantee of freedom of association means anything at all, it should mean the freedom not to associate. If we respect freedom of speech, Americans should reject any compulsion whatsoever in political speech. And if the government is going to force you to do something, it better have an awfully good reason for it.
Freedom… |
88 |
Political Earthquake Ahead
Bush v. Gore decided a single election. But the case heard by the Supreme Court on Monday could impact elections for many years. The Justices' remarks during arguments in Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association point to a major setback looming for public unions. The Court will likely rule that teachers and other unionized public workers don't… |
89 |
'Messing With the Constitution'
In recent years, a small but growing number of people have advocated a convention of states to propose amendments to the Constitution of the United States. The reaction to the proposal has been hostile, out of all proportion to either the originality or the danger of such a convention.
The political left has been especially vehement in its denunciations… |
90 |
New Court Defeat for Obama Means Win for Redskins, Free Speech and Intellectual Property Rights
Whatever the Washington Redskins' fortunes in the NFL playoffs that kick off this week, they've already enjoyed a notable judicial victory beyond the playing field.
The ruling also constitutes a victory for free speech and intellectual property (IP) rights, but yet another embarrassing judicial defeat for the Obama Administration on one of Barack… |
|
Page 3 of 6 |