One of the great triumphs of the federal welfare reform legislation passed in the mid-1990s was an insistence…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
To Get More Federal Money, States Claiming Volunteer Organizations are a Form of Welfare Spending

One of the great triumphs of the federal welfare reform legislation passed in the mid-1990s was an insistence that states lay down tough work requirements for welfare recipients as a condition of receiving federal assistance. Though the fact is little publicized, however, another provision of the law allows states to substitute increased welfare spending for the work requirements and still receive money from Washington. That, of course, is an invitation to mischief, as reported by CNSnews, quoting Congressman Geoff Davis

"Many States have scoured their budgets to find other current program spending--such as for Pre-K, child care, and after school programs--they could report as TANF [welfare] spending," Davis said at a hearing on Thursday. "Others began counting third-party spending--such…[more]

May 22, 2012 • 01:24 pm

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Jester's CourtroomLegal tales stranger than stranger than fiction: Ridiculous and sometimes funny lawsuits plaguing our courts.
Press Releases
CFIF Joins Free Market Coalition in Support of Digital Goods and Services Tax Fairness Act Print E-mail
Wednesday, April 25 2012

In a letter sent to the Senate Finance Committee, the Center for Individual Freedom joined with a coalition of 12 free market organizations to endorse the Digital Goods and Services Tax Fairness Act (S. 971). 

The legislation, sponsored by Senators John Thune (R-SD) and Ron Wyden (D-OR), would prevent states from imposing multiple, excessive and discriminatory taxes on digital goods and services (i.e. downloaded movies, books and apps), as well as hold state policymakers accountable for enacting new taxes on e-commerce.

The letter, which was organized by Americans for Tax Reform, can be read below or downloaded here (pdf).


 April 25, 2012

U.S. Senate Committee on Finance

RE: S. 971, Digital Goods and Services Tax Fairness Act

Dear Members of the Senate Committee on Finance,

On behalf of millions of taxpaying Americans, we write to urge your support for the Digital Goods and Service Tax Fairness Act (S. 971). Sponsored by Sens. John Thune (R-S.D.) and Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), the measure creates a much-needed framework for taxing digital goods and services across the fifty states to prevent double taxation and hold policymakers accountable for enacting new taxes.

Across the country, states are establishing new taxes on downloaded goods, such as music, books, movies, and mobile applications. This has resulted in a patchwork of varying standards for taxing digital e-commerce, and could result in multiple states taxing a single consumer purchase or levying higher and discriminatory taxes on downloads. S. 971 will ensure that when a digital product is purchased, it is taxed once and only once.

E-commerce is inherently an interstate activity, as the Internet does not acknowledge state borders. As a result, a consumer in Montana could purchase a digital product online from a company in California that is located on a server in North Carolina. The legislation would ensure that only the state where the consumer is based has taxing authority. Without the federal framework contained in this bill, each of these states could claim taxing jurisdiction, resulting in excessive taxation of online goods and services.

The Digital Goods and Services Tax Fairness Act will make sure there is accountability and public awareness should a state begin to tax digital goods. Today, eight states have begun taxing downloaded products by administrative fiat at state Departments of Revenue, bypassing the legislative process altogether.

Internet and digital commerce is a highly dynamic and rapidly growing sector of the American economy. The Digital Goods and Services Tax Fairness Act will help to eliminate tax-related burdens on interstate commerce that could stifle the vital online market.

As you consider a number of tax-related measures impacting interstate commerce, we urge you to support S. 971, the Digital Goods and Services Tax Fairness Act. The measure will bring much needed clarity and simplicity to interstate e-commerce, while preventing states from engaging in excessive and discriminatory tax policy.

Sincerely,

Grover Norquist
President
Americans for Tax Reform

U.S. Chamber of Commerce

Andrew Moylan
Vice President of Government Affairs
National Taxpayers Union

David Williams
President
Taxpayers Protection Alliance

Chuck Muth
President
Citizen Outreach

Seton Motley
President
Less Government

Jeffrey Mazzella
President
Center for Individual Freedom

James Valvo
Director of Policy
Americans for Prosperity

Tom Schatz
President
Council for Citizens Against Government Waste

Mike Wendy
Director
MediaFreedom.org

Kelly William Cobb
Executive Director
Digital Liberty

Webb Scott Brown
President/CEO
Montana Chamber of Commerce

 


Page 1 of 66
Question of the Week   
Which one of the following men did the Chicago Tribune describe as: “a bullheaded man whose high place … was won by his ability to waste more money in quicker time on more absurd undertakings?”
More Questions
Quote of the Day   
 
"This week Catholic bishops are heading to federal courts across the country to defend religious liberty. On Monday they filed 12 lawsuits on behalf of a diverse group of 43 Catholic entities that are challenging the Department of Health and Human Services' (HHS) sterilization, abortifacient and birth-control insurance mandate. ...  The main goal of the mandate is not, as HHS claimed, to protect…[more]
 
 
—Mary Ann Glendon, Harvard Law School Professor
— Mary Ann Glendon, Harvard Law School Professor
 
Liberty Poll   

Should the Obama administration authorize the use of aerial drones by local police agencies?