Americans already expressed record satisfaction on economic conditions in the U.S., over three years…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
Image of the Day: Economy Even Better Than We Realized

Americans already expressed record satisfaction on economic conditions in the U.S., over three years into President Trump's tenure.  Turns out that things are even better than we initially realized, as employment data from the end of 2019 was just significantly updated:

. [caption id="" align="alignleft" width="480"] Even Better Than First Realized[/caption]

 

.  …[more]

February 14, 2020 • 10:06 am

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Jester's CourtroomLegal tales stranger than stranger than fiction: Ridiculous and sometimes funny lawsuits plaguing our courts.
Home Press Room Free Market Groups to FCC: Stop Dragging Your Feet and Approve Verizon/SpectrumCo Deal Now
Free Market Groups to FCC: Stop Dragging Your Feet and Approve Verizon/SpectrumCo Deal Now Print
Friday, June 08 2012

In a letter delivered today, a coalition of 14 free market organizations, including the Center for Individual Freedom (“CFIF”), urged the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) to approve a private deal between Verizon and cable companies that will free currently unused spectrum to help alleviate the growing “spectrum crunch” that many wireless consumers – particularly those in densely populated areas of the country – are already feeling.

“With demand for wireless broadband more than doubling annually, the FCC’s own estimates predict that demand for wireless spectrum will exceed supply in 2013,” said CFIF President Jeffrey Mazzella.  “Yet Obama’s FCC has done little if anything at all to make much-needed spectrum available to wireless network operators.  Worse, the FCC has worked to delay and outright block private-sector deals to alleviate the growing spectrum crunch,” Mazzella continued.

“Consumers in densely populated urban areas are already suffering from inadequate wireless capacity,” the letter reads. “While meeting this robust demand will require wireless carriers to adopt an ‘all-of-the-above’ approach, increasing spectrum availability is unquestionably the most fundamental and cost-effective means to meet wireless demand.”

The letter, which was organized by Digital Liberty – a project of Americans for Tax Reform – can be read below or downloaded here (.pdf)


 June 8, 2012

Julius Genachowski, Chairman
Federal Communications Commission
445 12th Street, SW
Washington, DC 20554

RE: WT Docket No. 12-­‐4
Verizon Wireless, SpectrumCo and Cox – Assignment of AWS Licenses

Dear Chairman Genachowski,

We, the undersigned organizations representing millions of American citizens, urge the Federal Communications Commission to approve the transfer of spectrum licenses from SpectrumCo and Cox to Verizon Wireless. The move will increase competition in the mobile market, give consumers more choices in wireless providers, and expand access to affordable mobile services.

Demand for wireless broadband is more than doubling annually, but vast swaths of valuable spectrum – the lifeblood of mobile communications – remain unavailable to wireless carriers. Consumers in densely populated urban areas are already suffering from inadequate wireless capacity. While meeting this robust demand will require wireless carriers to adopt an “all-of-the-above” approach, increasing spectrum availability is unquestionably the most fundamental and cost-effective means to meet wireless demand.

Unfortunately, spectrum auctions that will enable wireless carriers to bid on additional spectrum remain years away. Verizon Wireless’s proposed transfer presents a rare and crucial opportunity to deploy currently unused spectrum for wireless broadband. The spectrum at issue is ideally situated in the 1700/2100 MHz AWS bands, covering over 80 percent of the U.S. population (259 million POPs). Consumers will see substantial net benefits from expanded coverage enabled by additional spectrum, especially compared to more costly and time-consuming undertakings such as cell splitting.

The transaction will increase competition in the market and help put downward pressure on consumer prices. If anything, the deal between SpectrumCo and Verizon Wireless will increase the number of competitors by allowing cable companies – unable to provide the substantial sums of capital necessary to launch a new wireless network – to purchase wholesale access to Verizon’s network and market new products and services under their own names. In no way would the transaction reduce the number of market actors.
More importantly, competition is not simply a metric determined by how many companies compete in a given market, or their market share. As even this Administration's Department of Justice told the FCC in their submission on the National Broadband Plan, "promoting competition in broadband markets...does not mean striving for broadband markets that look like textbook markets of perfect competition, with many price-taking firms." Rather, competition is the activity of businesses vying for consumers and vigorously improving their offerings over time.

Opponents of the transfer falsely decry a growing duopoly in the wireless market and claim prices have risen, or will rise, as a result. Yet the average price paid per megabyte of data transferred – the highest cost driver of consumer bills – fell by 46 percent between 2010 and 2011 even as data consumption grew by 89 percent. Freeing more spectrum for wireless use and bringing new market entrants through this innovative arrangement will put even more downward pressure on consumer prices.

Finally, we urge the Commission to ignore hypothetical alternative arrangements in which the spectrum licenses at issue might be sold to other carriers. Section 310(d) of the Communications Act, on which the Commission’s legal authority over this deal rests, clearly requires the FCC to show that a given transaction would reduce competition and bars comparisons to hypothetical alternative transactions. All facts indicate this transaction will advance the public interest and increase – not decrease – competition.

We urge the Commission to approve this transfer of spectrum licenses from SpectrumCo and Cox to Verizon Wireless. Delaying or denying the transaction will only harm consumers and represent another failure by the Commission to bring new spectrum online to expand mobile broadband access, availability, and affordability.

Sincerely,

Grover Norquist
President
Americans for Tax Reform

Ryan Radia
Associate Director of Technology Studies
Competitive Enterprise Institute

Berin Szoka
President
TechFreedom

Kelly Cobb
Executive Director
Digital Liberty

Bartlett Cleland
Policy Counsel
Institute for Policy Innovation

Jeffrey Mazzella
President
Center for Individual Freedom

Thomas Schatz
President
Council for Citizens Against Government Waste

Seton Motley
President
Less Government

Mike Wendy
Director
MediaFreedom.org

Andrew Moylan
Vice President of Government Affairs
National Taxpayers Union

Scott Cleland
Chairman
Net Competition

David Williams
President
Taxpayers Protection Alliance

Steve Pociask
President
American Consumer Institute

Chuck Muth
President
Citizen Outreach

Related Articles :
Question of the Week   
How many Members of the House of Representatives have been on the general election ballot for President while they were still sitting House Members?
More Questions
Quote of the Day   
 
"For those who can do simple arithmetic, here are some fun numbers on Bernie Sanders' harebrained socialist schemes:Bernie Sanders said at the debate last night that he wants minimum wage to be $15 per hour.15$ X 40 per week = $600600$ X 52 weeks per yr = $31,200Bernie Sanders wants free health care for all and was asked how he would pay for it. His answer was raise taxes to 52% on anybody making…[more]
 
 
—Tweet By James Woods, Actor, Social Commentator (and MIT graduate)
— Tweet By James Woods, Actor, Social Commentator (and MIT graduate)
 
Liberty Poll   

How confident are you that U.S. health officials are taking adequate measures to prevent the acute spread of coronavirus within the country?