Democrats hope to press the "affordability" issue in this year's midterm election season, but there'…
CFIF on X CFIF on YouTube
Inflation: Comparing Trump and Biden...

Democrats hope to press the "affordability" issue in this year's midterm election season, but there's one potentially glaring problem for them, as illustrated by our friends at Unleash Prosperity...

[caption id="" align="alignleft" width="668"] Biden Versus Trump on Inflation[/caption]

 …[more]

August 17, 2026 • 04:40 PM
Home Press Room CFIF Joins Amicus Brief to Compel TSA to Comply With Court Order Regarding Its Use of Full-Body Scanners
CFIF Joins Amicus Brief to Compel TSA to Comply With Court Order Regarding Its Use of Full-Body Scanners Print
Thursday, July 26 2012

The Center for Individual Freedom (“CFIF”) recently signed on to a brief of amici curiae, which urges the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit to compel the Transportation Security Administration ("TSA") to comply with a year-old court order to give the public an opportunity to comment on the agency’s use of full-body scanners in airports. 

The brief weighs in support of a petition for writ of mandamus filed by the Electronic Privacy Information Center ("EPIC") in the case of EPIC v. DHS, in which last July the D.C. Circuit directed TSA to “promptly” initiate a legally required notice-and-comment rulemaking on the use of such scanners.  To date, TSA has failed to open such a public rulemaking pursuant to the D.C. Circuit’s order or offer a concrete timetable for its commencement.

The brief was organized by the Competitive Enterprise Institute.  In addition to CFIF, the brief was joined by Robert L. Crandall (former Chairman and CEO of AMR and American Airlines), the National Association of Airline Passengers, Americans for Tax Reform’s Digital Liberty, Electronic Frontier Foundation, The Rutherford Institute, Cyber Privacy Project, Center for Financial Privacy and Human Rights, and the Liberty Coalition.

A copy of the brief can be read by clicking here.*

Download and view the brief as it was filed with the court here (PDF).

UPDATE - (August 6, 2012):

* In the original brief filed with the D.C. Circuit, CFIF was incorrectly identified on the corporate disclosure statement as a 501(c)(3) corporation. CFIF is a 501(c)(4) corporation. A Notice of Errata correcting the error was filed with the court on August 1, 2012, and can be viewed by clicking here (PDF).

Notable Quote   
 
"The U.S. Supreme Court will kick off its 2026 term next week with what will be one of its biggest cases of the year. And according to several legal specialists, there's much more to the dispute than meets the eye.The case in question is Suncor v. Boulder, which deals with the lawfare that Boulder, Colorado, launched against Suncor Energy companies and the Exxon Mobil Corporation. The city is seeking…[more]
 
 
— Shawn Fleetwood, Teh Federalist
 
Liberty Poll   

Based on the meteoric development of AI, do you believe that your job is going to be threatened or enhanced?