Today's Wall Street Journal commentary "Take the Palestinians' 'No' for an Answer" offers the choice…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
Quote of the Day: Trump Beats the "Experts" Again

Today's Wall Street Journal commentary "Take the Palestinians' 'No' for an Answer" offers the choice quote of the day today, highlighting the way in which President Trump's decision to finally (and rightfully) relocate the U.S. embassy in Israel to Jerusalem has once again proved him more prescient than the foreign policy "experts" who predicted dire consequences:

. This week's U.S.-led Peace to Prosperity conference in Bahrain on the Palestinian economy will likely be attended by seven Arab states - a clear rebuke to foreign-policy experts who said that recognizing Jerusalem as Israel's capital and the Golan Heights as Israeli territory would alienate the Arab world."

. The piece also highlights how the Palestinians stand alone among nations who somehow claim entitlement…[more]

June 24, 2019 • 01:32 pm

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Jester's CourtroomLegal tales stranger than stranger than fiction: Ridiculous and sometimes funny lawsuits plaguing our courts.
Home Press Room Coalition Supports Vote to Block Obama Labor Department Fiduciary Rule
Coalition Supports Vote to Block Obama Labor Department Fiduciary Rule Print
Thursday, April 28 2016

In a letter sent to Congress today, the Center for Individual Freedom (CFIF) joined a coalition 30 organizations and individuals in urging a vote in support of H.J. Res. 88, which uses the Congressional Review Act to disapprove of the Department of Labor’s so-called fiduciary rule and prevent it from going into effect. 

The letter, which was organized by the Competitive Enterprise Insitute (CEI), can be read below or on CEI's website here (PDF).

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

April 28, 2016

Members of Congress:

We, the undersigned organizations and individuals, represent millions of Americans in defense of free markets and constitutional liberties. As such, we believe Congress must exercise its authority granted by the Constitution to halt the Obama administration's executive overreach. This is particularly true when such action by the administration has attracted bipartisan opposition owing to the massive negative effects it would have on Americans' retirement savings.

We urge you to support H.J. Res. 88, introduced by Reps. Phil Roe (R-Tenn.), Charles Boustany (R-La.), and Ann Wagner (R-Mo.), which uses the Congressional Review Act to disapprove of the Department of Labor’s (DOL) fiduciary rule and prevent it from going into effect. Under the fiduciary rule, the DOL claims authority never granted by Congress to greatly restrict investment choices for 401(k)s, individual retirement accounts (IRAs) and other saving vehicles.

In the earlier, proposed regulation, referred to by many as “Obamacare for your IRA,” the DOL did not even bother to hide its contempt for the intelligence of American savers. It said most Americans can't "prudently manage retirement assets on their own." Based on this paternalism, the administration now mandates that investment professionals—even if they are serving self-directed investors—must adhere to the government's one-size-fits-all definition of "best interest" for the investment products they offer. The final rule leaves no room for individual savers to decide what their own "best interests" are.

Ninety-six House Democrats have expressed concern that the fiduciary rule could limit access to retirement planning for poor and middle-class Americans. Center-left economists from the Brookings Institution and Progressive Policy Institute have concluded that the rule would cause many Americans to lose their current brokers and could cost savers $80 billion over the next decade.

Put simply, the rule would make it much more difficult for individuals to open and maintain an IRA, and for companies to offer 401(k)s. As leading experts say, many brokers will stop serving households with less than $50,000 in assets. The restrictions, therefore, amount to a higher tax burden on Americans by making it harder for the vehicles for retirement saving, designed by Congress, to lower that burden.

IRA holders could also lose their ability to invest in gold, real estate, and other nontraditional assets if DOL bureaucrats deem these choices to be not in their "best interests."

We believe the federal government should vigorously prosecute actual fraud by financial professionals, but otherwise leave savers free to seek guidance and make investment choices they deem in their own best interests, taking account of their own individual circumstances and preferences. We urge Congress to do everything in its power to defeat the DOL's destructive fiduciary rule, including passing this resolution of disapproval under the Congressional Review Act.

Sincerely,

Kent Lassman 
President 
Competitive Enterprise Institute

Lisa B. Nelson
Chief Executive Officer
American Legislative Exchange Council

Grover Norquist
President 
Americans for Tax Reform

Carrie Lukas
Managing Director 
Independent Women’s Forum

Heather Higgins
President & CEO
Independent Women’s Voice

Phil Kerpen
President 
American Commitment

Coley Jackson
President 
Americans for Competitive Enterprise

Brent Gardner
Vice President of Government Affairs
Americans for Prosperity

Dan Weber
CEO 
Association of Mature American Citizens

Norman Singleton
Senior Vice President
Campaign for Liberty

Andrew Quinlan
President 
Center for Freedom and Prosperity

Timothy Lee
Senior Vice President 
Center for Individual Freedom

Tom Schatz
President
Council for Citizens Against Government Waste

Wayne Brough
Chief Economist & Vice President for Research 
FreedomWorks Foundation

George Landrith
President 
Frontiers of Freedom

Andrew Clark
President
Generation Opportunity

Andresen Blom
Executive Director 
Grassroot Hawaii Action, Inc

Andrew Langer
President 
Institute for Liberty

Seton Motley
President 
Less Government

Gregory T. Angelo
President 
Log Cabin Republicans

Kyle S. Hauptman
Executive Director
Main Street Growth Project

Related Articles :
Question of the Week   
Where in the U.S. Constitution is the requirement for a decennial census?
More Questions
Quote of the Day   
 
"This week's debates will be the first time millions of Americans meet the cast of Democrats trying to take out President Donald Trump.That's precisely what has party brass terrified.Interviews with nearly 20 Democratic elected officials, party chiefs, labor leaders and operatives the past week revealed an air of foreboding verging on alarm that the debates will degenerate into a two-night, bare-knuckle…[more]
 
 
—Holly Otterbein, Reporter for Politico
— Holly Otterbein, Reporter for Politico
 
Liberty Poll   

In response to the escalating series of provocations by Iran, do you believe Pres. Trump's measured response, including positioning of military assets and documenting Iran's actions to allies, is better policy than immediate retaliatory strikes?