Alongside other conservative and libertarian organizations, we at CFIF have been highlighting the clear…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
Pelosi Healthcare Proposal H.R. 3 Isn't Just Destructive, It's Likely Unconstitutional

Alongside other conservative and libertarian organizations, we at CFIF have been highlighting the clear and present danger of Nancy Pelosi's (D - California) proposed healthcare legislation H.R. 3 in letters to Congress and commentaries.

Pelosi’s bill includes an astonishing 95% tax on total pharmaceutical sales – not on profits, but sales – for private companies that don’t play ball to Pelosi’s satisfaction. Her proposal would also impose foreign price controls, completely restructure the popular Medicare Part D program, and create a compulsory arbitration mechanism overseen by government bureaucrats...  Pelosi’s legislation would jeopardize nearly $1 trillion in U.S. pharmaceutical investment, undermine patent protections, suffocate drug innovation and ultimately punish consumers…[more]

October 29, 2019 • 10:15 am

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Jester's CourtroomLegal tales stranger than stranger than fiction: Ridiculous and sometimes funny lawsuits plaguing our courts.
Home Press Room New Television Ad Warns About Dangerous Precedent That Would Be Set by Puerto Rico Debt Legislation
New Television Ad Warns About Dangerous Precedent That Would Be Set by Puerto Rico Debt Legislation Print
Tuesday, May 17 2016

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, the Center for Individual Freedom released a new television ad warning about the dangerous precedent Congress would be setting by passing the Puerto Rico Oversight, Management, and Economic Stability Act (PROMESA), legislation currently being considered by the House Committee on Natural Resources, in its current form. 

As Congress continues to debate legislation to address Puerto Rico’s financial crisis, CFIF’s new ad warns America's savers and seniors across America, as well as lawmakers, to be wary of the domino effect that could result should Congress pass the current version of PROMESA, which would provide “Super Chapter 9 bankruptcy” provisions for the Commonwealth. 

“After years of reckless spending, Puerto Rico is out of money. Now savers and seniors could pay the price,” CFIF’s ad begins.  The ad goes on to point out that high-spending states like Illinois, New Jersey and California collectively owe trillions of dollars in debt.  If Congress changes the rules to retroactively enable Puerto Rico itself to renege on its constitutionally prioritized "full faith and credit" debt, Congress would be establishing a political precedent to do the same for those financially troubled states and others in the future.

“Puerto Rico is just the first domino to fall… Tell Congress:  No ‘Super Chapter 9 Bankruptcy’ for Puerto Rico,” the ad concludes.

This ad is the most recent in CFIF’s ongoing education campaign regarding Puerto Rico’s debt crisis and legislation regarding the issue. In its current form, the PROMESA “Super Chapter 9” bill undermines the rule of law, threatens the property rights of the Commonwealth’s bondholders, increases moral hazard and sets a dangerous precedent for high-spending, financially distressed states that will expect similar rescue measures from Congress moving forward.

View the television ad below.


Related Articles :
Question of the Week   
In which one of the following years did Congress LAST pass a formal Declaration of War?
More Questions
Quote of the Day   
"Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) doubled down on his defense of President Trump amid the ongoing impeachment inquiry, arguing there's 'nothing there' in the call between Trump and Ukrainian leaders to suggest the president did anything wrong.'You make your mind up about the phone call. I made my mind up. There's nothing there,' Graham said in an interview Saturday with KCCI, a Des Moines CBS affiliate…[more]
—Rebecca Klar, The Hill
— Rebecca Klar, The Hill
Liberty Poll   

As the House impeachment hearings go public, how interested are you in watching all or part of televised coverage?