Are wealthier Americans paying their "fair share" of taxes? No.  Assuming that one measures "fair…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
Myth Versus Fact: Paying "Fair Share" of Taxes

Are wealthier Americans paying their "fair share" of taxes?

No.  Assuming that one measures "fair share" as a rough equivalency between income earned and income taxes paid, wealthy Americans pay far more than their fair share, as helpfully illustrated by the Tax Foundation:

. [caption id="" align="aligncenter" width="637" caption=""Fair Share?""][/caption]

.…[more]

January 23, 2018 • 11:43 am

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Jester's CourtroomLegal tales stranger than stranger than fiction: Ridiculous and sometimes funny lawsuits plaguing our courts.
Home Press Room CFIF Statement on Introduction of Copyright Office Reform Legislation
CFIF Statement on Introduction of Copyright Office Reform Legislation Print
Friday, March 24 2017

ALEXANDRIA, VA - This week, the Chairmen and Ranking Members of both the Senate and House Judiciary committees introduced important legislation - the Register of Copyrights Selection and Accountability Act – which, among other things, makes the U.S. Register of Copyrights a position appointed by the president subject to Senate confirmation. 

In response, Center for Individual Freedom (CFIF) Senior Vice President of Legal and Public Affairs Timothy Lee issued the following statement: 

"CFIF applauds this much-needed legislation as a crucial step towards more thorough U.S. Copyright Office modernization in order to meet the new challenges of the 21st century.  Strong copyright protection constitutes a core component of our domestic economy, and our world-leading creative community in particular.  American copyright-related industries contribute over $1 trillion to the American economy, as well as accounting for 5.5 million jobs, and remain a significant export sector that only keeps growing," Lee said. 

"The Copyright Office is crucial in that realm, administering the registration and recordation systems, as well as advising Congress, our judicial system and other pivotal parties on both domestic and international copyright matters.  Unfortunately, under the current system created over 120 years ago, the Office is currently housed within the Library of Congress, which faces its own challenges and responsibilities.  Consequently, the Copyright Office has struggled to keep pace in the increasingly digital economy despite repeated calls urging modernization," Lee continued. 

"CFIF therefore applauds the long-needed legislative effort to begin modernizing the Copyright Office in this way.  Although only a first step in broader Copyright Office reform, it is an important one.  It also offers a rare bipartisan opportunity for Congress, in addition to how it helps American consumers and our creative and innovation communities.  Every living former Register of Copyrights has urged Copyright Office restructuring, and CFIF agrees wholeheartedly with that broad consensus.  American consumers, our economy and export industries stand to benefit immensely from this important step,” Lee concluded. 

###

Related Articles :
Question of the Week   
Which one of the following U.S. Naval officers is famous for stating: ‘Damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead’?
More Questions
Quote of the Day   
 
"Democrats' solution to the government shutdown could be as harmful to the party as the shutdown was itself.The war between hardline progressive and centrist Democrats inflamed by the party's 2016 presidential primary contest has ebbed and flowed, but the agreement Sen. Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., came to with Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., on Monday ignited yet another…[more]
 
 
—Emily Jashinsky, Washington Examiner
— Emily Jashinsky, Washington Examiner
 
Liberty Poll   

Traditionally, the President's political party loses Congressional seats in midterm elections. Will the positive economic trends being generated by tax reform allow Republicans to retain enough seats in 2018 to maintain majorities in both houses?