Consumer spending accounts for approximately two-thirds of the U.S. economy, and this helpful chart…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
Shattering the Decade of "New Normal" Economic Sluggishness

Consumer spending accounts for approximately two-thirds of the U.S. economy, and this helpful chart from the U.S. Senate's Joint Economic Committee illustrates why our economy suddenly turbocharged over the past two years from its decade of sluggishness that we were told was the "new normal":

[caption id="" align="aligncenter" width="439" caption="Turbocharging the U.S. Consumer Economy"][/caption]…[more]

October 15, 2018 • 11:46 am

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Jester's CourtroomLegal tales stranger than stranger than fiction: Ridiculous and sometimes funny lawsuits plaguing our courts.
Home Press Room Coalition Applauds 'Delicate Balance' House Tax Reform Bill Achieves Regarding Interest Deductibility
Coalition Applauds 'Delicate Balance' House Tax Reform Bill Achieves Regarding Interest Deductibility Print
Wednesday, November 08 2017

The Honorable Kevin Brady
Chairman, Committee on Ways and Means
United States House of Representatives
1100 Longworth House Office Building
Washington, D.C.  20515

RE:  Preserving Interest Deductibility is Critical to Capital Investment, Job Creation and Economic Growth

Dear Chairman Brady:

On behalf of the members of the following organizations, we write today to express our strong support for the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act introduced on November 2nd.  We applaud your efforts to prioritize tax reform in the 115th Congress and support efforts to modernize the tax code to promote economic growth and job creation.  We greatly appreciate your leadership on tax reform, and we stand ready to work with you and your colleagues to ensure swift passage of your legislation in the days ahead.

In addition to the much-needed reduction in the corporate tax rate, we greatly appreciate the delicate balance that the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act achieves with respect to interest deductibility for businesses.   As you know, access to affordable capital is a key determinant in whether and how quickly investments can be made to grow their businesses.  Because debt is the most accessible and cost-efficient form of capital, it is important that businesses continue to be allowed to deduct interest as an ordinary and necessary business expense. 

Significantly, the House Tax Cuts and Jobs Act recognizes the importance of affordable capital by not proposing complete elimination of interest deductibility or a flat percentage "haircut" on the deduction.  Adoption of a percentage haircut would overstate a corporation’s economic income, result in over-taxation, and increase the cost of capital. This would hamper the ability of many companies to invest and expand their businesses.  We are supportive of the bill's carefully crafted 30% “thin-cap” rule, which strikes the right balance by preserving interest deductibility, but not rewarding overly leveraged companies.  Indeed, capital-intensive companies that finance infrastructure investment through a combination of debt and equity will have a greater ability to maintain proposed levels of investment if limits on the deductibility of interest are imposed using a thin-cap rule.

We urge the Committee to remain committed to the thin cap approach to the interest deduction.  Elimination of the deduction or an arbitrary haircut runs counter to a stated purpose of corporate tax reform – to make the U.S. system more competitive and more consistent with other countries.  In contrast, adoption of a thin-cap rule as currently contemplated would not make the U.S. an outlier with respect to other countries, because a few countries, such as Germany, already impose thin-cap rules applicable to a company’s interest expense. 

We look forward to working with you and your colleagues to achieve the important goal of passing the House Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.


Pete Sepp
National Taxpayers Union

Thomas A. Schatz
Council for Citizens Against Government Waste

David Williams
Taxpayer Protection Alliance

Charles Sauer
Market Institute

Tom Giovanetti
Institute for Policy Innovation

Jeff Mazzella
Center for Individual Freedom

Andrew Langer
Institute for Liberty

Bartlett Cleland
Madery Bridge

Related Articles :
Question of the Week   
Between 1946 and 2016, what percentage of U.S. Supreme Court decisions have split evenly (4-4)?
More Questions
Quote of the Day   
"With the confirmation of Justice Kavanaugh, for the first time in generations there is a majority of justices on the Supreme Court who, to varying degrees, practice originalism and textualism. This means that the Court can systematically begin to restore the Constitution to its original meaning. This constitutional restoration does not mean that the Constitution's original meaning is the best choice…[more]
—John Yoo and James C. Phillips
— John Yoo and James C. Phillips
Liberty Poll   

During a campaign season, particularly one as intense as the current midterm cycle, do you respond to telephone political polling?