In an excellent piece in today's Wall Street Journal, Scott Atlas of Stanford University highlights…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
Want to Address Drug Costs? Avoid Price Controls, Eliminate PBMs and Don't Weaken Patents

In an excellent piece in today's Wall Street Journal, Scott Atlas of Stanford University highlights how Americans enjoy far greater access to new lifesaving drugs than patients in Europe and elsewhere, and how the movement to impose government price controls would only restrict access to new drugs and degrade Americans' health outcomes, as we at CFIF have been emphasizing:

America has superior treatment results for virtually all serious diseases reliant on drug treatment, including cancer, heart disease, stroke, high blood pressure and diabetes.  Price controls would jeopardize that advantage...

Pegging drug prices to those of foreign countries, as both Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump have proposed, would ultimately lead to the same consequences Europeans endure - reduced access…[more]

February 14, 2019 • 05:20 pm

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Jester's CourtroomLegal tales stranger than stranger than fiction: Ridiculous and sometimes funny lawsuits plaguing our courts.
Home Press Room Coalition Urges Support of the STRONGER Patents Act
Coalition Urges Support of the STRONGER Patents Act Print
Wednesday, February 21 2018

In a letter sent to Congress today, a coalition of nearly two dozen conservative and free market organizations, led by the Center for Individual Freedom, urged support of the STRONGER Patents Act of 2017 (S.1390), bipartisan legislation that will provide relief and support to American creators and innovators by restoring the historic strength of the U.S. patent system.

“The American patent system, once the global ‘Gold Standard,’ has been systematically weakened in recent years,” reads the letter.  “A new government board created in 2012, the Patent and Trademark Appeals Board (PTAB), has been dubbed a ‘patent death squad’ by one former federal judge.  The panel eliminates at least one patent claim in an astounding 81% of petitions it hears.”

The coalition goes on to note, “The U.S. Chamber of Commerce’s ranking of National Patent Systems of 45 countries in its 2017 Global IP Index reflects PTAB’s impact. As detailed in the Index, the U.S., which has historically had the strongest patent system in the world, has slipped to tenth place, in a dead tie with Hungary.”

The Stronger Patents Act of 2017 is sponsored by Senators Tom Cotton (R-AR) and Chris Coons (D-DE).

Read the letter below or download it here (PDF).


February 22, 2018

Dear Members of Congress,

On behalf of the undersigned organizations, representing millions of Americans, we urge you to support S.1390, the STRONGER Patents Act of 2017.  The STRONGER Patents Act will provide relief and support to American creators and innovators by restoring the historic strength of the U.S. patent system.

Enshrined in the Constitution, the patent system is the cornerstone of our nation’s prosperity and a major driver of economic growth.  Article I, Section 8, grants Congress the authority: “To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries.” Our founding fathers understood that innovation was critical to economic growth and quality of life, and that, the only way to encourage innovation was to reward and protect it.  Their foresight led to unparalleled advances in science and technology that have fueled American strength and improved people’s lives all over the world. 

Abraham Lincoln, the only U.S. president to ever own a patent, once stated that patents “added the fuel of interest to the fire of genius in the discovery and production of new and useful things.” One-hundred-and-fifty years old, that quote has never been more relevant than it is today. 

With patents, the numbers speak for themselves.  America’s innovation economy has led to our collective ownership of one-fourth of the 10.6 million active patents worldwide. IP-related U.S. industries account for $5.8 trillion, or 35% of our GDP and for 74% of total U.S. exports, nearly $1 trillion in value.  America's IP industries also employ over 40 million workers in high paying jobs, paying employees approximately 30% more than average. 

All of this, however, is at risk.  The American patent system, once the global “Gold Standard,” has been systematically weakened in recent years. A new government board created in 2012, the Patent and Trademark Appeals Board (PTAB), has been dubbed a “patent death squad” by one former federal judge.  The panel eliminates at least one patent claim in an astounding 81% of petitions it hears. 

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce’s ranking of National Patent Systems of 45 countries in its 2017 Global IP Index reflects PTAB’s impact. As detailed in the Index, the U.S., which has historically had the strongest patent system in the world, has slipped to tenth place, in a dead tie with Hungary. If we don’t immediately reverse course and protect our patent system, American ingenuity will be increasingly offshored.

The importance of supporting America’s patent system is clear -– and so too is the need for a legislative solution to defend the foundation of patents as property rights and restore balanced in the patent process that is so integral to American investment in job creation and innovation.

We applaud the bipartisan effort of Sen. Chris Coons (D-Del.) and Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) for championing S.1390, the STRONGER Patents

Act of 2017. STRONGER patents will reverse the missteps that have crippled American inventors and entrepreneurs and undermined U.S. inventiveness.

We urge you to support and pass S.1390, the STRONGER Patents Act of 2017, to restore the well-established American patent system. Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,

Jeffrey Mazzella, President, Center for Individual Freedom
Lisa B. Nelson, CEO, ALEC Action
Dick Patten, President, American Business Defense Council
Phil Kerpen, President, American Commitment
Daniel Schneider, Executive Director, American Conservative Union
Dee Stewart, President, Americans for a Balanced Budget
Ginvera Joyce Meyers, Executive Director, Center for Innovation and Free Enterprise
James Edwards, Executive Director, Conservatives for Property Rights
Matthew Kandrach, President, Consumer Action for a Strong Economy
Hance Haney, Director of Technology & Democracy Project, Discovery Institute
Ed Martin, President, Eagle Forum Education & Legal Defense Fund
Paul Caprio, Director, Family Pac Federal
Jason Pye, Vice President of Legislative Affairs, FreedomWorks
George Landrith, President, Frontiers of Freedom
Michael A. Needham, CEO, Heritage Action for America
Tom Giovanetti, President, Institute for Policy Innovation
Seton Motley, President, Less Government
Colin A. Hanna, President, Let Freedom Ring
Karen Kerrigan, President & CEO, Small Business & Entrepreneurship Council
James L. Martin, Founder/Chairman, 60 Plus Association
David Williams, President, Taxpayers Protection Alliance
Jenny Beth Martin, Chairman, Tea Party Patriots Citizens Fund
C. Preston Noell III, President, Tradition, Family, Property, Inc. 

Related Articles :
Question of the Week   
How many votes need to be cast in the affirmative in order to expel a member of Congress from either Chamber?
More Questions
Quote of the Day   
 
"Amazon does not need New York City. There are many advantages to operating in a city such as New York, which offers experiences and opportunities that well-paid tech-company executives are not going to find in such business-friendly alternatives as Houston or Las Vegas. But Amazon has decided that these are not worth the price of admission, which in this case would be subjecting itself to a political…[more]
 
 
—Kevin D. Williamson, National Review
— Kevin D. Williamson, National Review
 
Liberty Poll   

Given the hard-left turn of Democratic Party leaders and many rank-and-file elected officials, how do you think Democrats will fare in 2020 elections?