We at CFIF have steadfastly highlighted the consumer benefits of the proposed T-Mobile/Sprint merger…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
WSJ Urges Regulators to Approve T-Mobile/Sprint Merger

We at CFIF have steadfastly highlighted the consumer benefits of the proposed T-Mobile/Sprint merger, and cautioned the federal government against any pointless and destructive objection to the deal.  In today's Wall Street Journal, its editorial board encourages the Department of Justice (DOJ) to move forward on the deal:

The Justice Department lost its lawsuit to block AT&T's purchase of Time Warner.  Yet now the antitrust cops are holding up T-Mobile's merger with Sprint even though it could give AT&T more competition in wireless.  What gives?

A year ago, T-Mobile announced plans to acquire Sprint for $26 billion in stock, yet the merger is still stuck in government antitrust purgatory.  The Federal Communications Commission keeps pausing its 180-day shot clock on the merger…[more]

April 22, 2019 • 04:07 pm

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Jester's CourtroomLegal tales stranger than stranger than fiction: Ridiculous and sometimes funny lawsuits plaguing our courts.
Home Press Room CFIF Joins Coalition Urging President Trump to Reconsider Aluminum and Steel Tariffs
CFIF Joins Coalition Urging President Trump to Reconsider Aluminum and Steel Tariffs Print
Tuesday, March 06 2018

The Center for Individual Freedom ("CFIF") today joined a coalition of 26 organizations, led by Taxpayers Protection Alliance, on a letter urging President Trump to reconsider the tariffs on aluminum and steel announced on March 1, 2018.

“We appreciate your work cutting taxes and promoting America, but tariffs on aluminum and steel will be a tax on the Middle Class with everything from cars to baseball bats to even beer being more expensive,” reads the letter. 

“Free trade is an integral foundation for any economy seeking growth, innovation, and expanded opportunity. Not only is free trade good for the U.S. economy, it is also good for the American taxpayer,” the letter continues.

Read the full letter below or view it here (PDF).


March 6, 2018

The Honorable Donald J. Trump
President of the United States
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW
Washington, DC 20500

Dear Mr. President:

On behalf of the undersigned groups representing millions of taxpayers and consumers across the country, we urge you to reconsider the tariffs on aluminum and steel announced on March 1, 2018.  We appreciate your work cutting taxes and promoting America, but tariffs on aluminum and steel will be a tax on the Middle Class with everything from cars to baseball bats to even beer being more expensive.

Free trade is an integral foundation for any economy seeking growth, innovation, and expanded opportunity. Not only is free trade good for the U.S. economy, it is also good for the American taxpayer.

As President, you pledged to put America and American jobs first. But imposing tariffs would be bad for the economy and bad for American workers. U.S. manufacturers that consume steel employ an estimated 40 to 60 times more U.S. workers than do steel producing facilities. This tax hike would put these jobs at risk. In fact, when George W Bush increased tariffs on steel, 200,000 jobs were lost as a direct result.

If the U.S. government develops a fortress mentality in a global marketplace, it will spur trading partners to treat U.S. products in the same manner. If foreign governments imitate the U.S. government’s use of tariffs, U.S. exports of manufactured goods could decline. Nothing is more important to long-term U.S. prosperity than being able to sell America’s exceptional products in markets that 95 percent of the world’s population call home.  

In December, you signed into law the most significant tax reform in more than 30 years. These tax cuts will revolutionize the US economy, create new jobs and increase living standards throughout the country. This new tariff proposal puts all of that at risk. A new tax on steel and aluminum will cost jobs, increase costs to consumers, and force businesses to go overseas. We strongly urge you to reconsider this proposal.

Sincerely,

David Williams
President
Taxpayers Protection Alliance

Phil Kerpen
President
American Commitment

Steve Pociask
President
American Consumer Institute

Lisa B. Nelson
CEO
American Legislative Exchange Council
 
Ashley N. Varner
Executive Director
ALEC Action

Robert Alt
President & CEO
Buckeye Institute

Norm Singleton
President
Campaign for Liberty

Andrew F. Quinlan
President
Center for Freedom and Prosperity

Jeffrey Mazzella
President
Center for Individual Freedom

Iain Murray
Vice President for Strategy
Competitive Enterprise Institute

Matthew Kandrach
President
Consumer Action for a Strong Economy

Frederik Roeder
Managing Director
Consumer Choice Center

David McIntosh
President
Club for Growth

Robert Roper
President
Ethan Allen Institute

Jason Pye
Vice President of Legislative Affairs
FreedomWorks

George Landrith
President
Frontiers of Freedom

Mario Lopez
President
Hispanic Leadership Fund

John Tillman
CEO
Illinois Policy Institute

Carrie L. Lukas
President
Independent Women’s Forum

Heather R. Higgins
CEO
Independent Women’s Voice

Tom Giovanetti
President
Institute for Policy Innovation

Kory Swanson
President and CEO
John Locke Foundation

Lindsay Boyd Killen
Vice President for Strategic Outreach and Communications
Mackinac Center for Public Policy

Brent Mead
CEO
Montana Policy Institute

Pete Sepp
President
National Taxpayers Union

Paul Gessing
President
Rio Grande Foundation

Richard M. Esenberg
President/General Counsel
Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty

 

CC:  Mr. Wilbur Ross
Secretary
Department of Commerce

CC:  Mr. Gary Cohn
Director
National Economic Council

CC:  Peter Navarro
Director
White House National Trade Council

 

Related Articles :
Question of the Week   
In which one of the following years was the first White House Easter Egg Roll held?
More Questions
Quote of the Day   
 
"The credibility of the Democratic Party is now at issue.If Mueller could not find collusion, what reason is there to believe Rep. Jerry Nadler's judiciary committee will find it, and then convince the country that they have discovered what ex-FBI Director Mueller could not.With conspiracy and collusion off the table, and Mueller saying the case for obstruction is unproven, the renewed attack on Trump…[more]
 
 
—Patrick J. Buchanan, Syndicated Columnist and The American Conservative Magazine Founding Editor
— Patrick J. Buchanan, Syndicated Columnist and The American Conservative Magazine Founding Editor
 
Liberty Poll   

How likely are you to read all or a significant part of the Mueller Report?