CFIF often highlights how the Biden Administration's bizarre decision to resurrect failed Title II "…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
Image of the Day: U.S. Internet Speeds Skyrocketed After Ending Failed Title II "Net Neutrality" Experiment

CFIF often highlights how the Biden Administration's bizarre decision to resurrect failed Title II "Net Neutrality" internet regulation, which caused private broadband investment to decline for the first time ever outside of a recession during its brief experiment at the end of the Obama Administration, is a terrible idea that will only punish consumers if allowed to take effect.

Here's what happened after that brief experiment was repealed under the Trump Administration and Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chairman Ajit Pai - internet speeds skyrocketed despite late-night comedians' and left-wing activists' warnings that the internet was doomed:

[caption id="" align="aligncenter" width="515"] Internet Speeds Post-"Net Neutrality"[/caption]

 …[more]

April 19, 2024 • 09:51 AM

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Home Press Room RELEASE: CFIF Calls on EPA to Reconsider Costly and Arbitrary Global Warming Regulation
RELEASE: CFIF Calls on EPA to Reconsider Costly and Arbitrary Global Warming Regulation Print
Friday, December 18 2009

ALEXANDRIA, VA – Today, the Center for Individual Freedom (CFIF) called upon Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Lisa Jackson to reconsider the EPA’s costly and defective endangerment finding for alleged greenhouse gas emissions.  The EPA recently exceeded its proper authority by unilaterally declaring everyday carbon dioxide a “dangerous pollutant.”  This unwarranted and illogical determination threatens to cripple the American economy by suddenly burdening businesses and consumers with new carbon regulations and penalties. 

The EPA is now attempting to create a fig leaf by arbitrarily stating that only businesses emitting over 25,000 tons per year would be subject to its regulation.  Unfortunately, the Clean Air Act on which the EPA regulation is based explicitly regulates even low-level sources of covered emissions, and provides no statutory authority for the EPA to set its lower threshold.  As a consequence, extremist environmental groups are sure to sue the EPA to overturn its 25,000-ton limit, which would suddenly subject even minimal emitters to draconian carbon regulations. 

“At a time of high unemployment and economic uncertainty throughout America, the last thing the EPA and federal regulators should be doing is imposing crippling new global warming regulations upon businesses,” said Timothy Lee, CFIF’s Vice President of Legal and Public Affairs.  “This may be popular in Europe and among America’s competitors and enemies, but it’s bad news for Americans. Not only is the EPA’s ruling likely to be overturned by litigious environmental activists, but it will subject millions of businesses, schools, apartment buildings and even farms to its draconian regulation,” Mr. Lee added. 

“We therefore call upon the EPA to reconsider its attempt to single-handedly regulate the American economy, if not abandon it altogether,” said Lee.  “This is not the time for even more burdensome and unnecessary burdens upon employers and businesses,” Lee concluded. 

To read CFIF's comment as it was submitted to the EPA, click here (.pdf)

###

Notable Quote   
 
"Remember when progressives said the Trump Administration's rollback of net neutrality would break the internet? Federal Communications Commission Chair Jessica Rosenworcel now concedes this was wrong, yet she plans to reclaim political control over the internet anyway to stop a parade of new and highly doubtful horribles.The FCC on Thursday is expected to vote to reclassify broadband providers as…[more]
 
 
— Wall Street Journal Editorial Board
 
Liberty Poll   

If TikTok's data collection or manipulation under Chinese ownership is the grave danger to the American people that our government says it is (and it may well be), then wouldn't the prudent action be to ban it immediately rather than some time down the ro