John Lott, our favorite economist at least in the arena of criminology and Second Amendment scholarship…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
Stat of the Day: Everywhere Guns Are Banned, Murder Rates Increase

John Lott, our favorite economist at least in the arena of criminology and Second Amendment scholarship, cogently summarizes the actual, real-world, data-based sociological effect of "gun control" laws:

. While gun bans (either a ban on all guns or on all handguns) have been imposed in many places, every time guns have been banned, murder rates have gone up.

One would think that one time, just out of simple randomness, murder rates would have gone down or at least stayed the same.  Yet in every single case for which we have crime data both before and after the ban, murder rates have gone up, often by huge amounts."

. It's almost as if more guns mean less crime.…[more]

October 20, 2017 • 11:58 am

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Jester's CourtroomLegal tales stranger than stranger than fiction: Ridiculous and sometimes funny lawsuits plaguing our courts.
Home Press Room 2010 Midterm Elections: Net Neutrality Winners and Losers
2010 Midterm Elections: Net Neutrality Winners and Losers Print
Thursday, November 04 2010

ALEXANDRIA, VA – The Center for Individual Freedom today announced that 24 respondents to its 2010 Candidate Issues Survey who expressed definitive opposition to Net Neutrality were victorious on Tuesday in their midterm election contests. 

CFIF made its announcement in response to the news that all 95 candidates who signed the Progressive Change Campaign Committee’s (PCCC) pledge in support of Net Neutrality lost their elections.  That’s 0 for 95.

CFIF’s survey, which was mailed to all candidates running for federal office, contained five questions on issue topics that it believes are representative of what voters and the American people are most concerned about.  In addition to questions about healthcare, taxes, and debt and deficit spending, question five of CFIF’s survey asked the following:

“President Obama’s Federal Communications Commission (FCC) favors implementation of ‘Net Neutrality’ regulations upon Internet service by a 3-2 margin.  ‘Net Neutrality’ advocates assert that more federal regulation is necessary to prevent the possibility of content blockage by service providers.  Opponents of ‘Net Neutrality’ assert that it would discourage future investment in broadband expansion and innovation, prohibit Internet traffic management, and undermine service quality.  Do you favor or oppose federal regulations that would impose ‘Net Neutrality?’”

Of the 24 victorious candidates who responded in opposition to Net Neutrality, 14 were incumbents and 10 were challengers.

“Unlike PCCC and other pro-Net Neutrality groups who tried desperately to make Net Neutrality regulation a major issue in the midterm elections, we are under no delusion that it was,” said CFIF President Jeffrey Mazzella.  “But the issue is indicative of voters’ belief that the current administration is overreaching in its pro-regulatory zeal.  And, when comparing the victorious 24 candidates who expressed opposition to Net Neutrality on CFIF’s issues survey to PCCC’s 95 pledge signers who support Net Neutrality, all of whom lost, the only rational conclusion one can make is that support for this issue is a political loser,” Mazzella concluded.

The 24 candidates who answered CFIF’s survey in opposition to Net Neutrality and won their elections are:

Mo Brooks (AL-5)
Gary Miller (CA-32)
Doug Lamborn (CO-5)
David Rivera (FL-25)
Cliff Stearns (FL-6)
Paul Broun (GA-10) 
Mike Crapo (ID-Senate)
Raul Labrador (ID-1)
Donald Manzullo (IL-16)
Marlin Stutzman (IN-3)
Todd Rokita (IN-4)
Mike Pompeo (KS-4)
John Fleming (LA-4)
Bill Huizenga (MI-2)
Vicky Hartzler (MO-4)
Patrick McHenry (NC-10)
Sue Myrick (NC-9)
Joe Wilson (SC-2)
Trey Gowdy (SC-4)
John Duncan (TN-2)
Ted Poe (TX-2)
Ralph Hall (TX-4)
Rob Bishop (UT-1)
David McKinley (WV-1)

###


 Founded in 1998, the Center for Individual Freedom (www.cfif.org) is a Constitutional and free-market advocacy organization with more than 250,000 supporters and activists nationwide.  CFIF opposes over-burdensome state and federal regulations, as well as taxation, that impedes the evolution of the Internet and e-commerce.  CFIF maintains www.StopNetRegulation.org, a website explaining Net Neutrality, why it will stifle Internet innovation and job growth, and how to get involved.


Related Articles :
Question of the Week   
Which one of the following battles effectively ended the American Revolutionary War?
More Questions
Quote of the Day   
 
"History will record that the Islamic State caliphate -- a bizarre pseudo-state founded on illusory goals, created by a global horde of jihadis, and enforced with perverted viciousness -- survived for three years, three months and some eighteen days. The fall of Raqqa, the nominal ISIS capital, was proclaimed on Tuesday by the U.S.-backed militia that spearheaded the offensive, a coalition of Kurdish…[more]
 
 
—Robin Wright, Newyorker.com Contributing Writer
— Robin Wright, Newyorker.com Contributing Writer
 
Liberty Poll   

What is your family’s reaction to this week’s statement that the NFL would like for players to stand for the national anthem, but will not force them to do so?