Like clockwork, climate alarmists attributed Hurricane Sandy in 2012 to anthropogenic (man-caused) global…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
Global Warming... Back in 1821?

Like clockwork, climate alarmists attributed Hurricane Sandy in 2012 to anthropogenic (man-caused) global warming.  In one typically irrational commentary, Paul Barrett equated global warming to steroids in its effect on the storm.

With that hyperbole and hysteria in mind, a Discovery Channel item this week provided appropriate humor.  Entitled "Thought Sandy Was Bad?  Revisit This 1821 Hurricane," its historical piece offers beneficial perspective:

Remember all the hype about Hurricane Sandy being a 'superstorm,' a once-in-500-years convergence of meteorological nastiness?  According to a newly-published study by a Swiss insurance firm, Swiss Re, things could have been a lot worse.  Though the combination of factors that created Sandy was indeed unusual, Sandy wasn't the most powerful…[more]

September 30, 2014 • 04:17 pm

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Jester's CourtroomLegal tales stranger than stranger than fiction: Ridiculous and sometimes funny lawsuits plaguing our courts.
Home Press Room 2010 Midterm Elections: Net Neutrality Winners and Losers
2010 Midterm Elections: Net Neutrality Winners and Losers Print
Thursday, November 04 2010

ALEXANDRIA, VA – The Center for Individual Freedom today announced that 24 respondents to its 2010 Candidate Issues Survey who expressed definitive opposition to Net Neutrality were victorious on Tuesday in their midterm election contests. 

CFIF made its announcement in response to the news that all 95 candidates who signed the Progressive Change Campaign Committee’s (PCCC) pledge in support of Net Neutrality lost their elections.  That’s 0 for 95.

CFIF’s survey, which was mailed to all candidates running for federal office, contained five questions on issue topics that it believes are representative of what voters and the American people are most concerned about.  In addition to questions about healthcare, taxes, and debt and deficit spending, question five of CFIF’s survey asked the following:

“President Obama’s Federal Communications Commission (FCC) favors implementation of ‘Net Neutrality’ regulations upon Internet service by a 3-2 margin.  ‘Net Neutrality’ advocates assert that more federal regulation is necessary to prevent the possibility of content blockage by service providers.  Opponents of ‘Net Neutrality’ assert that it would discourage future investment in broadband expansion and innovation, prohibit Internet traffic management, and undermine service quality.  Do you favor or oppose federal regulations that would impose ‘Net Neutrality?’”

Of the 24 victorious candidates who responded in opposition to Net Neutrality, 14 were incumbents and 10 were challengers.

“Unlike PCCC and other pro-Net Neutrality groups who tried desperately to make Net Neutrality regulation a major issue in the midterm elections, we are under no delusion that it was,” said CFIF President Jeffrey Mazzella.  “But the issue is indicative of voters’ belief that the current administration is overreaching in its pro-regulatory zeal.  And, when comparing the victorious 24 candidates who expressed opposition to Net Neutrality on CFIF’s issues survey to PCCC’s 95 pledge signers who support Net Neutrality, all of whom lost, the only rational conclusion one can make is that support for this issue is a political loser,” Mazzella concluded.

The 24 candidates who answered CFIF’s survey in opposition to Net Neutrality and won their elections are:

Mo Brooks (AL-5)
Gary Miller (CA-32)
Doug Lamborn (CO-5)
David Rivera (FL-25)
Cliff Stearns (FL-6)
Paul Broun (GA-10) 
Mike Crapo (ID-Senate)
Raul Labrador (ID-1)
Donald Manzullo (IL-16)
Marlin Stutzman (IN-3)
Todd Rokita (IN-4)
Mike Pompeo (KS-4)
John Fleming (LA-4)
Bill Huizenga (MI-2)
Vicky Hartzler (MO-4)
Patrick McHenry (NC-10)
Sue Myrick (NC-9)
Joe Wilson (SC-2)
Trey Gowdy (SC-4)
John Duncan (TN-2)
Ted Poe (TX-2)
Ralph Hall (TX-4)
Rob Bishop (UT-1)
David McKinley (WV-1)

###


 Founded in 1998, the Center for Individual Freedom (www.cfif.org) is a Constitutional and free-market advocacy organization with more than 250,000 supporters and activists nationwide.  CFIF opposes over-burdensome state and federal regulations, as well as taxation, that impedes the evolution of the Internet and e-commerce.  CFIF maintains www.StopNetRegulation.org, a website explaining Net Neutrality, why it will stifle Internet innovation and job growth, and how to get involved.


Related Articles :
Question of the Week   
What percentage of the American people cannot name even one branch of the federal government?
More Questions
Quote of the Day   
 
"If Mr. Obama isn't thinking about cashiering a top adviser, he should start now. CIA Director John Brennan has presided over serial intelligence debacles — including the failure to anticipate the fall of Mosul — while National Intelligence Director James Clapper has had no credibility in Congress since he lied to a Senate committee. John Kerry's incompetent diplomacy in Jerusalem and…[more]
 
 
—Bret Stephens, The Wall Street Journal
— Bret Stephens, The Wall Street Journal
 
Liberty Poll   

In selecting a nominee to replace Eric Holder as Attorney General, will President Obama choose someone who is less ideological and less divisive to serve as the country’s chief law enforcement officer?