We at CFIF believe that the issue of online gaming should remain something addressed at the state level…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
Online Gaming Bill: Congressional Debate Should Include Pro-Liberty, Pro-Federalism Voices

We at CFIF believe that the issue of online gaming should remain something addressed at the state level, as opposed to a new one-size-fits all nationwide ban over all 50 states.  We therefore oppose proposed federal legislation deceptively named the Restoration of America's Wire Act (RAWA).

Rather than disrespect the foundational concept of state sovereignty in our federal system, not to mention the principles of free markets and individual consumer choice, it would be better for Congress to simply maintain existing law.  After all, what reasonable person today believes that even more federal regulation of something traditionally left to states and individual Americans should be commandeered by federal bureaucrats within a one-size-fits all straightjacket?  On the heels of the Federal…[more]

March 06, 2015 • 11:47 am

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Jester's CourtroomLegal tales stranger than stranger than fiction: Ridiculous and sometimes funny lawsuits plaguing our courts.
Home Press Room 2010 Midterm Elections: Net Neutrality Winners and Losers
2010 Midterm Elections: Net Neutrality Winners and Losers Print
Thursday, November 04 2010

ALEXANDRIA, VA – The Center for Individual Freedom today announced that 24 respondents to its 2010 Candidate Issues Survey who expressed definitive opposition to Net Neutrality were victorious on Tuesday in their midterm election contests. 

CFIF made its announcement in response to the news that all 95 candidates who signed the Progressive Change Campaign Committee’s (PCCC) pledge in support of Net Neutrality lost their elections.  That’s 0 for 95.

CFIF’s survey, which was mailed to all candidates running for federal office, contained five questions on issue topics that it believes are representative of what voters and the American people are most concerned about.  In addition to questions about healthcare, taxes, and debt and deficit spending, question five of CFIF’s survey asked the following:

“President Obama’s Federal Communications Commission (FCC) favors implementation of ‘Net Neutrality’ regulations upon Internet service by a 3-2 margin.  ‘Net Neutrality’ advocates assert that more federal regulation is necessary to prevent the possibility of content blockage by service providers.  Opponents of ‘Net Neutrality’ assert that it would discourage future investment in broadband expansion and innovation, prohibit Internet traffic management, and undermine service quality.  Do you favor or oppose federal regulations that would impose ‘Net Neutrality?’”

Of the 24 victorious candidates who responded in opposition to Net Neutrality, 14 were incumbents and 10 were challengers.

“Unlike PCCC and other pro-Net Neutrality groups who tried desperately to make Net Neutrality regulation a major issue in the midterm elections, we are under no delusion that it was,” said CFIF President Jeffrey Mazzella.  “But the issue is indicative of voters’ belief that the current administration is overreaching in its pro-regulatory zeal.  And, when comparing the victorious 24 candidates who expressed opposition to Net Neutrality on CFIF’s issues survey to PCCC’s 95 pledge signers who support Net Neutrality, all of whom lost, the only rational conclusion one can make is that support for this issue is a political loser,” Mazzella concluded.

The 24 candidates who answered CFIF’s survey in opposition to Net Neutrality and won their elections are:

Mo Brooks (AL-5)
Gary Miller (CA-32)
Doug Lamborn (CO-5)
David Rivera (FL-25)
Cliff Stearns (FL-6)
Paul Broun (GA-10) 
Mike Crapo (ID-Senate)
Raul Labrador (ID-1)
Donald Manzullo (IL-16)
Marlin Stutzman (IN-3)
Todd Rokita (IN-4)
Mike Pompeo (KS-4)
John Fleming (LA-4)
Bill Huizenga (MI-2)
Vicky Hartzler (MO-4)
Patrick McHenry (NC-10)
Sue Myrick (NC-9)
Joe Wilson (SC-2)
Trey Gowdy (SC-4)
John Duncan (TN-2)
Ted Poe (TX-2)
Ralph Hall (TX-4)
Rob Bishop (UT-1)
David McKinley (WV-1)

###


 Founded in 1998, the Center for Individual Freedom (www.cfif.org) is a Constitutional and free-market advocacy organization with more than 250,000 supporters and activists nationwide.  CFIF opposes over-burdensome state and federal regulations, as well as taxation, that impedes the evolution of the Internet and e-commerce.  CFIF maintains www.StopNetRegulation.org, a website explaining Net Neutrality, why it will stifle Internet innovation and job growth, and how to get involved.


Related Articles :
Question of the Week   
In addition to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, which of the following foreign dignitaries have addressed a Joint Meeting or Session of Congress three times?
More Questions
Quote of the Day   
 
"For six years, Obama has offered the mullahs an extended hand. He has imagined that with Kissingerian brilliance he would turn the Khamenei regime into a de facto U.S. ally in pacifying the Middle East. For his pains, Obama has been rewarded with an Iran that has ramped up its aggressiveness in Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Gaza and Yemen, and brazenly defied the world on uranium enrichment.He did the same…[more]
 
 
—Charles Krauthammer, Syndicated Columnist
— Charles Krauthammer, Syndicated Columnist
 
Liberty Poll   

Will the collective scandals of Benghazi, foreign government donations to the Clinton Foundation and Hillary Clinton’s use of private email accounts and servers while Secretary of State derail her presidential aspirations?