Democrats hope to press the "affordability" issue in this year's midterm election season, but there'…
CFIF on X CFIF on YouTube
Inflation: Comparing Trump and Biden...

Democrats hope to press the "affordability" issue in this year's midterm election season, but there's one potentially glaring problem for them, as illustrated by our friends at Unleash Prosperity...

[caption id="" align="alignleft" width="668"] Biden Versus Trump on Inflation[/caption]

 …[more]

August 17, 2026 • 04:40 PM
Home Press Room CFIF Statement on the FCC’s Latest “Net Neutrality” Incarnation
CFIF Statement on the FCC’s Latest “Net Neutrality” Incarnation Print
Wednesday, December 01 2010

ALEXANDRIA, VA -- Today, Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) Chairman Julius Genachowski announced his intention to impose “Net Neutrality” regulation on the Internet by year’s end.  The new plan, which has not been released publicly and which presumably will be deliberated on and revised behind closed doors over the next three weeks, will be voted on at the FCC’s December 21 meeting. 

In response, Center for Individual Freedom (“CFIF”) President Jeffrey Mazzella made the following statement:

“By a two-to-one margin, the American public opposes regulation of the Internet via ‘Net Neutrality,’ and a bipartisan majority in Congress has expressed opposition to it in no uncertain terms.  A unanimous panel on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit has ruled that the FCC lacks authority to regulate the Internet. Yet, bucking the federal courts, Congress and public opinion, the FCC persists. 

“While we appreciate the fact that Chairman Genachowski has seemingly stepped back from the ‘Title II reclassification’ cliff, we maintain that opening up the regulatory Pandora’s Box that is ‘Net Neutrality’ at all is both unwarranted and unnecessary.  For a government agency to unilaterally grant itself the power to do so is flat out dangerous.”

###

Related Articles :
Notable Quote   
 
"Seven years ago, I warned that Democrats were 'courting disaster' by turning their frustration with the Supreme Court into a campaign to remake it. Their 2020 presidential field was talking about adding justices, limiting their terms, and otherwise changing the rules because Donald Trump had gotten to replace Antonin Scalia and Anthony Kennedy. The Democrats' flirtation with blowing up the high court…[more]
 
 
— Ilya Shapiro, Senior Fellow and Director of Constitutional Studies at the Manhattan Institute and a Contributing Editor of City Journal
 
Liberty Poll   

Although Canada ultimately has much more to lose than the U.S. and does play fast and loose on some trade issues, given all other current concerns, is this the time to escalate a tariff war?