One of the great triumphs of the federal welfare reform legislation passed in the mid-1990s was an insistence…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
To Get More Federal Money, States Claiming Volunteer Organizations are a Form of Welfare Spending

One of the great triumphs of the federal welfare reform legislation passed in the mid-1990s was an insistence that states lay down tough work requirements for welfare recipients as a condition of receiving federal assistance. Though the fact is little publicized, however, another provision of the law allows states to substitute increased welfare spending for the work requirements and still receive money from Washington. That, of course, is an invitation to mischief, as reported by CNSnews, quoting Congressman Geoff Davis

"Many States have scoured their budgets to find other current program spending--such as for Pre-K, child care, and after school programs--they could report as TANF [welfare] spending," Davis said at a hearing on Thursday. "Others began counting third-party spending--such…[more]

May 22, 2012 • 01:24 pm

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Jester's CourtroomLegal tales stranger than stranger than fiction: Ridiculous and sometimes funny lawsuits plaguing our courts.
Home Press Room CFIF Statement on the FCC’s Latest “Net Neutrality” Incarnation
CFIF Statement on the FCC’s Latest “Net Neutrality” Incarnation Print
Wednesday, December 01 2010

ALEXANDRIA, VA -- Today, Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) Chairman Julius Genachowski announced his intention to impose “Net Neutrality” regulation on the Internet by year’s end.  The new plan, which has not been released publicly and which presumably will be deliberated on and revised behind closed doors over the next three weeks, will be voted on at the FCC’s December 21 meeting. 

In response, Center for Individual Freedom (“CFIF”) President Jeffrey Mazzella made the following statement:

“By a two-to-one margin, the American public opposes regulation of the Internet via ‘Net Neutrality,’ and a bipartisan majority in Congress has expressed opposition to it in no uncertain terms.  A unanimous panel on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit has ruled that the FCC lacks authority to regulate the Internet. Yet, bucking the federal courts, Congress and public opinion, the FCC persists. 

“While we appreciate the fact that Chairman Genachowski has seemingly stepped back from the ‘Title II reclassification’ cliff, we maintain that opening up the regulatory Pandora’s Box that is ‘Net Neutrality’ at all is both unwarranted and unnecessary.  For a government agency to unilaterally grant itself the power to do so is flat out dangerous.”

###

Related Articles :
Question of the Week   
Which one of the following men did the Chicago Tribune describe as: “a bullheaded man whose high place … was won by his ability to waste more money in quicker time on more absurd undertakings?”
More Questions
Quote of the Day   
 
"This week Catholic bishops are heading to federal courts across the country to defend religious liberty. On Monday they filed 12 lawsuits on behalf of a diverse group of 43 Catholic entities that are challenging the Department of Health and Human Services' (HHS) sterilization, abortifacient and birth-control insurance mandate. ...  The main goal of the mandate is not, as HHS claimed, to protect…[more]
 
 
—Mary Ann Glendon, Harvard Law School Professor
— Mary Ann Glendon, Harvard Law School Professor
 
Liberty Poll   

Should the Obama administration authorize the use of aerial drones by local police agencies?