One of the great triumphs of the federal welfare reform legislation passed in the mid-1990s was an insistence…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
To Get More Federal Money, States Claiming Volunteer Organizations are a Form of Welfare Spending

One of the great triumphs of the federal welfare reform legislation passed in the mid-1990s was an insistence that states lay down tough work requirements for welfare recipients as a condition of receiving federal assistance. Though the fact is little publicized, however, another provision of the law allows states to substitute increased welfare spending for the work requirements and still receive money from Washington. That, of course, is an invitation to mischief, as reported by CNSnews, quoting Congressman Geoff Davis

"Many States have scoured their budgets to find other current program spending--such as for Pre-K, child care, and after school programs--they could report as TANF [welfare] spending," Davis said at a hearing on Thursday. "Others began counting third-party spending--such…[more]

May 22, 2012 • 01:24 pm

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Jester's CourtroomLegal tales stranger than stranger than fiction: Ridiculous and sometimes funny lawsuits plaguing our courts.
Home Press Room CFIF Urges Texas Legislature to Reject New Taxes on “Thin Air”
CFIF Urges Texas Legislature to Reject New Taxes on “Thin Air” Print
Tuesday, April 05 2011

In a letter sent today to every member of the State Affairs Committee of the Texas House of Representatives, Center for Individual Freedom (CFIF) Vice President of Legal and Public Affairs Timothy Lee urged opposition to legislation (HB 259 and HB 3675) that would impose new and unwarranted taxes on satellite television providers. 

In addition to noting that Texas consumers already pay among the highest tax rates in the nation for telecommunication services, Lee questioned the justification for the proposed new taxes.  “HB 259 and HB 3675 would impose taxes on something satellite television providers don’t even use – the physical public right of way,” Lee wrote.  In other words, the Texas legislature is contemplating literally a tax on “thin air.”

Read the entire letter below.


April 5, 2011

Representative Byron Cook                                     Representative Jose Menendez
Chairman, House State Affairs Committee          Vice Chairman, House State Affairs Committee
Room E2.214, Capitol Extension                           Room EXT E1.420, Capitol Extension
P.O. Box 2910                                                             P.O. Box 2910
Austin, TX 78768                                                        Austin, TX 78768

VIA FACSIMILE

Dear Chairman Cook and Vice Chairman Menendez: 

On behalf of the Center for Individual Freedom (CFIF) and over 17,000 activists and supporters across the state of Texas, I write to urge your opposition to HB 259 and HB 3675, which would impose new and unwarranted taxes on satellite television providers.  Raising taxes of any kind during this period of elevated unemployment and economic difficulty is a destructive idea generally.  The new taxes contemplated by HB 259 and HB 3675, however, are particularly unjustified. 

First, Texans already pay among the highest tax rates in the nation for telecommunications services.  Last year, Texas consumers paid over $429 million in franchise taxes in its ten largest cities alone, and $1.2 billion over the past three years.  That is certainly not conducive to growth for such a critical sector of our future economy.  

Second, HB 259 and HB 3675 would impose taxes on something satellite television providers don’t even use – the physical public right of way.  It is certainly understandable that entities actually using the public right of way under city streets or along physical power lines should help maintain those rights of way.  But satellite video providers don’t even use the physical right of way – thus making HB 259 and HB 3675 a tax on “thin air.”  Texas already imposes taxes on video services, so imposing an entirely new tax on physical rights of way that satellite providers don’t even use is manifestly unfair. 

Moreover, it is estimated that only 10% of right of way taxes actually go to maintenance of right of way, with 90% of collected revenues going to general city funds.  Attempting to impose right of way taxes on satellite providers is therefore a transparent money grab.  Accordingly, we at CFIF respectfully request that you oppose the unfair taxes proposed by HB 259 and HB 3675 during this period of protracted economic difficulty, high unemployment and state business competition.  Thank you very much for your attention to this important matter.   

Sincerely,  

/s/
 
Timothy Lee 
Vice President of Legal and Public Affairs 


cc:  All members of the State Affairs Committee, Texas House of Representatives
 

Related Articles :
Question of the Week   
Which one of the following men did the Chicago Tribune describe as: “a bullheaded man whose high place … was won by his ability to waste more money in quicker time on more absurd undertakings?”
More Questions
Quote of the Day   
 
"This week Catholic bishops are heading to federal courts across the country to defend religious liberty. On Monday they filed 12 lawsuits on behalf of a diverse group of 43 Catholic entities that are challenging the Department of Health and Human Services' (HHS) sterilization, abortifacient and birth-control insurance mandate. ...  The main goal of the mandate is not, as HHS claimed, to protect…[more]
 
 
—Mary Ann Glendon, Harvard Law School Professor
— Mary Ann Glendon, Harvard Law School Professor
 
Liberty Poll   

Should the Obama administration authorize the use of aerial drones by local police agencies?