Echoing CFIF, today's Wall Street Journal board editorial applauds Federal Communications Commission…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
WSJ Applauds FCC Chairman Pai, Commissioner Carr in Support of T-Mobile/Sprint Merger

Echoing CFIF, today's Wall Street Journal board editorial applauds Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chairman Ajit Pai's and Commissioner Brendan Carr's expressions of support for the proposed T-Mobile/Sprint merger:

By joining forces, T-Mobile and Sprint will be better positioned to compete against wireless leaders Verizon and AT&T in the 5G era.   Sprint is sitting on loads of mid-band spectrum that boosts wireless speeds while T-Mobile boasts ample low-band spectrum that provides coverage.  The combination is likely to provide a faster, denser network."

As they rightly conclude, "government penalties pale next to the powerful market incentives that already exist for Sprint and T-Mobile to rapidly build out their networks lest they lose market share to Verizon, AT&T, cable…[more]

May 21, 2019 • 11:36 am

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Jester's CourtroomLegal tales stranger than stranger than fiction: Ridiculous and sometimes funny lawsuits plaguing our courts.
Home Press Room CFIF Urges Texas Legislature to Reject New Taxes on “Thin Air”
CFIF Urges Texas Legislature to Reject New Taxes on “Thin Air” Print
Tuesday, April 05 2011

In a letter sent today to every member of the State Affairs Committee of the Texas House of Representatives, Center for Individual Freedom (CFIF) Vice President of Legal and Public Affairs Timothy Lee urged opposition to legislation (HB 259 and HB 3675) that would impose new and unwarranted taxes on satellite television providers. 

In addition to noting that Texas consumers already pay among the highest tax rates in the nation for telecommunication services, Lee questioned the justification for the proposed new taxes.  “HB 259 and HB 3675 would impose taxes on something satellite television providers don’t even use – the physical public right of way,” Lee wrote.  In other words, the Texas legislature is contemplating literally a tax on “thin air.”

Read the entire letter below.


April 5, 2011

Representative Byron Cook                                     Representative Jose Menendez
Chairman, House State Affairs Committee          Vice Chairman, House State Affairs Committee
Room E2.214, Capitol Extension                           Room EXT E1.420, Capitol Extension
P.O. Box 2910                                                             P.O. Box 2910
Austin, TX 78768                                                        Austin, TX 78768

VIA FACSIMILE

Dear Chairman Cook and Vice Chairman Menendez: 

On behalf of the Center for Individual Freedom (CFIF) and over 17,000 activists and supporters across the state of Texas, I write to urge your opposition to HB 259 and HB 3675, which would impose new and unwarranted taxes on satellite television providers.  Raising taxes of any kind during this period of elevated unemployment and economic difficulty is a destructive idea generally.  The new taxes contemplated by HB 259 and HB 3675, however, are particularly unjustified. 

First, Texans already pay among the highest tax rates in the nation for telecommunications services.  Last year, Texas consumers paid over $429 million in franchise taxes in its ten largest cities alone, and $1.2 billion over the past three years.  That is certainly not conducive to growth for such a critical sector of our future economy.  

Second, HB 259 and HB 3675 would impose taxes on something satellite television providers don’t even use – the physical public right of way.  It is certainly understandable that entities actually using the public right of way under city streets or along physical power lines should help maintain those rights of way.  But satellite video providers don’t even use the physical right of way – thus making HB 259 and HB 3675 a tax on “thin air.”  Texas already imposes taxes on video services, so imposing an entirely new tax on physical rights of way that satellite providers don’t even use is manifestly unfair. 

Moreover, it is estimated that only 10% of right of way taxes actually go to maintenance of right of way, with 90% of collected revenues going to general city funds.  Attempting to impose right of way taxes on satellite providers is therefore a transparent money grab.  Accordingly, we at CFIF respectfully request that you oppose the unfair taxes proposed by HB 259 and HB 3675 during this period of protracted economic difficulty, high unemployment and state business competition.  Thank you very much for your attention to this important matter.   

Sincerely,  

/s/
 
Timothy Lee 
Vice President of Legal and Public Affairs 


cc:  All members of the State Affairs Committee, Texas House of Representatives
 

Question of the Week   
Americans are asked to observe a National Moment of Remembrance at 3 p.m. annually on which one of the following days?
More Questions
Quote of the Day   
 
"President Donald Trump has directed the heads of several government agencies to cooperate with Attorney General William Barr's investigation of the origins of the Russia probe.In a memo sent out Thursday, Trump also authorized Barr to declassify documents related to the Russia investigation.The memo grants Barr the authority to 'declassify, downgrade, or direct the declassification or downgrading…[more]
 
 
—Chuck Ross, The Daily Caller
— Chuck Ross, The Daily Caller
 
Liberty Poll   

Is President Trump right or wrong to curtail negotiations on infrastructure planning until Congress stops its myriad investigations of the president?