How much more in your monthly utility bill would you be happy to pay to combat global warming?  Probably…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
N.Y. Public Service Commission Chairwoman Offers Global Warming Rationalization for Taxpayer Subsidy Boondoggle

How much more in your monthly utility bill would you be happy to pay to combat global warming?  Probably not much, if anything.

Unfortunately, New York state residents are being lectured that they shouldn't have any choice.

That's the upshot of a festering crony capitalist utility boondoggle cooked up by state legislators in the name of global warming alarmism, as we at CFIF detailed earlier this month.

By way of refresher, the New York Public Service Commission (PSC) approved a new "Clean Energy Standard" (CES) last month, which requires that carbon-neutral sources account for at least 50% of energy generated in the state by the year 2030.  Making matters worse, CES provisions require power companies to buy Zero Emission Credits (ZECs) from a state government bureaucracy to benefit…[more]

September 22, 2016 • 08:24 pm

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Jester's CourtroomLegal tales stranger than stranger than fiction: Ridiculous and sometimes funny lawsuits plaguing our courts.
Press Releases
Coalition Reiterates Concerns About Proposal to Restructure the Air Traffic Control (ATC) System Print E-mail
Friday, August 05 2016

The Center for Individual Freedom ("CFIF") today led a coalition of national free-market organizations and public policy experts on a letter expressing concerns with certain proposals to restructure the air traffic control (ATC) system as part of a long-term Congressional reauthorization of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).  Specifically, the coalition emphasizes how current proposals do not constitute genuine privatization, but rather create a federally chartered non-profit corporation that repeats the mistakes of previous public/private entities such as Amtrak and the U.S. Postal Service. 

Read the letter below or download it here (PDF)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

August 5, 2016

The Honorable Bill Shuster                                    
Chairman                                                                       
House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee     
United States House of Representatives
2251 Rayburn House Office Building                            
Washington, D.C.  20515

The Honorable Peter DeFazio   
Ranking Member 
House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee
United States House of Representatives   
2134 Rayburn House Office Building 
Washington, D.C. 20515 

The Honorable Rick Larsen                                     
House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee
United States House of Representatives
2113 Rayburn House Office Building  Washington, D.C. 20515

The Honorable Frank LoBiondo 
House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee
United States House of Representatives 
2427 Rayburn House Office Building 
Washington, D.C. 20515 

Dear Chairman Shuster, Ranking Member DeFazio, Representative Larsen, and Representative LoBiondo: 

As Congress continues to consider a long term reauthorization of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), the undersigned wish to reiterate our concerns with proposals to restructure the air traffic control (ATC) system. While proponents of the restructuring trumpet the virtues of privatization, we feel it is important to point out that the current proposal is not a real privatization, but a federally chartered non-profit corporation that repeats the mistakes of previous public-private entities such as Amtrak and the U.S. Postal Service.

The primary benefit of privatization is that it eliminates the inefficiencies of a government bureaucracy in favor of the competition and choice of the free market. Unfortunately, the ATC proposal fails this test by creating an entity that retains a monopoly over air traffic control while continuing or expanding benefits for the current union for federal air traffic controllers.

As stated in our previous letter, we are concerned that the new entity would have the power to levy new taxes and user fees with no oversight by Congress. Without oversight by elected officials in Congress or the competition that comes with true privatization, this could result in skyrocketing travel costs for consumers.

With regard to organized labor, the proposed ATC entity not only fails to bring about advantages over the unionized federal work force, but may actually loosen restrictions on unionized ATC workers, such as prohibitions on strikes and caps on salaries. Small wonder that the National Air Traffic Controllers Association (NATCA) strongly supports the proposal. NATCA opposes even raising the mandatory retirement age of fifty-six for air traffic controllers, even though airline pilots are not required to retire until sixty-five.

With these concerns in mind, we urge you to support a clean reauthorization of the FAA, which will benefit travelers and taxpayers. 

Sincerely,

Jeffrey Mazzella
President 
Center for Individual Freedom 

George Landrith 
President 
Frontiers of Freedom 

Andrew Langer 
President 
Institute for Liberty 

Seton Motley 
President 
Less Government 

Jim Martin 
President 
60 Plus Association 

Diana Furchtgott-Roth 
Former Chief Economist 
U.S. Department of Labor 

 


Page 1 of 138
Question of the Week   
At what age are men in the U.S. required to register with the Selective Service?
More Questions
Quote of the Day   
 
"Immigration drains the government, sapping as much as $296 billion a year from federal, state and local taxpayers while depressing wages, at least in the short run, according to an authoritative study released Wednesday by the National Academies of Science, Engineering and Medicine. The 500-page academic tome is supposed to be the final word about the fiscal and economic effects of mass immigration…[more]
 
 
—Stephen Dinan, The Washington Times
— Stephen Dinan, The Washington Times
 
Liberty Poll   

Do you believe that Lester Holt, NBC News Anchor and moderator of the first televised presidential debate on September 26, will be equally tough on and fair to both candidates?