Lee:  Humiliating New Legal Defeat for Obama Administration, but Rule of Law Remains in the Balance…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
Liberty Update

Lee:  Humiliating New Legal Defeat for Obama Administration, but Rule of Law Remains in the Balance

Senik:  America's Civic Failure: Have We Gotten What We Deserve?

Ellis:  IRS, Immigration Scandals Are Destroying the Obama Administration's Credibility

Podcast:  The Ever Changing and Never Ending Negative Consequences of ObamaCare

Jester’s Courtroom:  Not Such Good Vibrations

Editorial Cartoons:  Latest Cartoons of Michael Ramirez

Quiz:  Question of the Week

Notable Quotes:  Quotes of the Week

If you are not already signed up to receive CFIF’s Liberty Update by e-mail, sign up here.…[more]

July 25, 2014 • 11:59 am

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Jester's CourtroomLegal tales stranger than stranger than fiction: Ridiculous and sometimes funny lawsuits plaguing our courts.
Press Releases
CFIF's Supplemental FCC Comment In Opposition to Internet Regulation Print E-mail
Friday, July 18 2014

 

Before the

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.  20554

 

 

 

__________________________________________

                                                                          )

In the Matter of:                                                          )

                                                                                    )

Protecting and Promoting the Open                           )          GN Docket No. 14-28                 

Internet                                                                       )

                                                                                    )

__________________________________________)          

 

 

 

Comment of the Center for Individual Freedom in Opposition to Internet Regulation

 

  

The Center for Individual Freedom (hereinafter “CFIF”), a constitutional and free market advocacy organization with more than 250,000 activists and supporters nationwide, respectfully submits the following supplemental Comment in opposition to so-called “Net Neutrality” regulation of the Internet contemplated by the Federal Communications Commission (hereinafter “FCC”). 

 

CFIF has filed a joint Comment in this matter alongside fellow free-market advocates, which details in fuller depth our substantive and legal opposition to this unprecedented form of Internet regulation.[1]  We submit this separate supplemental Comment, however, to emphasize a point particular to CFIF. 

 

Specifically, in recent weeks CFIF has worked to educate and inform its activist base and others about the Internet regulations contemplated in this matter.  As part of that effort, CFIF has invited public comment on the matter.  To date, CFIF’s efforts alone have resulted in no fewer than 60,000 comments being generated and sent to the FCC and Congress in opposition to the proposed FCC rules.  Those comments read, in part: 

 

“Over the past two decades, the Internet has flourished and revolutionized our lives precisely because it has remained free of government overregulation.  Recently, however, Obama’s Federal Communications Commission (FCC) proposed new rules that would reclassify broadband Internet as a monopoly-era plain old telephone service of decades past (a.k.a. common carrier telecommunications service) under Title II of the Communications Act.  Simply put, the federal government micromanaging the Internet is a dangerous scheme, one that Congress must halt and the FCC must abandon.  As a concerned citizen, I urge you to do everything in your power to stop any and all efforts by the FCC to reclassify broadband Internet under Title II of the Communications Act.” 

 

These citizens join CFIF in recognizing that the campaign to regulate the Internet like a public utility is one whose transparent goal and effect is to leverage federal regulatory force to the benefit of a narrow group of special interests.  It also constitutes an example of activist and bureaucratic hubris, one that will ultimately only harm consumers, jeopardize continued private investment in Internet infrastructure, threaten job growth and sow regulatory uncertainty. 

 

According to former FCC Commissioner Robert McDowell, "the Internet is the greatest deregulatory success story of all time — a simple fact that vexes those seeking new and unnecessary rules.”[2]  To date, $1.2 trillion has been invested into Internet infrastructure since 1996 by private broadband providers, while the Internet has given rise to leading American content companies such as Google, Facebook and Netflix, as well as over 750,000 jobs encompassing today’s “apps economy.”  Additionally, more than 99 percent of Americans have access to multiple high speed wireless or wired Internet service options, Internet speeds have increased 1,500 percent in the last decade and today 85 percent of American households possess access to networks capable of 100 megabits per second or higher.  By almost any objective measure, the Internet has flourished, all because of a conscious policy decision by lawmakers since the mid-1990s not to regulate the Internet as some sort of public utility.

 

           Accordingly, CFIF implores the FCC to halt this dangerous attempt to micromanage Internet service.   

 

Respectfully submitted,

 

Center for Individual Freedom 

Jeffrey Mazzella 

President 

815 King Street 

Suite 303

Alexandria, VA 22314 

 

July 18, 2014

 

 


Page 1 of 95
Question of the Week   
Mandatory vaccination laws were first enacted in the U.S. to prevent the spread of which one of the following communicable diseases?
More Questions
Quote of the Day   
 
"'The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice' is one of Obama’s favorite sayings. Ultimately, injustice and aggression don’t pay. ...  The world is aflame and our leader is on the 14th green. The arc of history may indeed bend toward justice, Mr. President. But, as you say, the arc is long. The job of a leader is to shorten it, to intervene on behalf of 'the fierce…[more]
 
 
—Charles Krauthammer, Nationally Syndicated Columnist
— Charles Krauthammer, Nationally Syndicated Columnist
 
Liberty Poll   

Is significant, proven plagiarism sufficient to disqualify, in the minds of voters, any candidate for public office?