Democrats hope to press the "affordability" issue in this year's midterm election season, but there'…
CFIF on X CFIF on YouTube
Inflation: Comparing Trump and Biden...

Democrats hope to press the "affordability" issue in this year's midterm election season, but there's one potentially glaring problem for them, as illustrated by our friends at Unleash Prosperity...

[caption id="" align="alignleft" width="668"] Biden Versus Trump on Inflation[/caption]

 …[more]

August 17, 2026 • 04:40 PM
Notable Quotes
 
Regarding the "Terror This Time":
 
 

"A U.S. government that has barred the phrase 'war on terror' has nonetheless acknowledged that a failed Christmas day bomb attack on an airliner was a terrorist attempt. Can we all now drop the pretense that we stopped fighting a war once Dick Cheney and George W. Bush left the White House?

"The attempt by 23-year-old Nigerian Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab follows the alleged murders in Ft. Hood, Texas by Islamist-inspired Major Nidal Hasan in November. Brian Jenkins, who studies terrorism for the Rand Corporation, says there were more terror incidents (12), including thwarted plots, on U.S. soil in 2009 than in any year since 2001. The jihadists don't seem to like Americans any better because we're closing down Guantanamo."

 
 
— The Editors, The Wall Street Journal
— The Editors, The Wall Street Journal
Posted December 28, 2009 • 08:52 AM
 
 
Editorial in Response to 8-year old Virginia Hanlon Questioning the Existence of Santa Claus:
 
 

"Yes, Virginia, there is a Santa Claus. He exists as certainly as love and generosity and devotion exist, and you know that they abound and give to your life its highest beauty and joy. Alas! how dreary would be the world if there were no Santa Claus… 

"No Santa Claus! Thank God! he lives, and he lives forever. A thousand years from now, Virginia, nay, ten times ten thousand years from now, he will continue to make glad the heart of childhood."

 
 
— Francis P. Church, The New York Sun, September 21, 1897
— Francis P. Church, The New York Sun, September 21, 1897
Posted December 22, 2009 • 09:10 PM
 
 
On Congressional Democrats and the Tea Party Movement:
 
 

"For Democrats like Harry Reid, who called them 'evil-mongers,' and Nancy Pelosi, who called them 'un-American,' the NBC News poll must have hit like a sucker punch at a Georgetown wine-and-cheese. The Tea Party movement, those folks rallying against spending last spring and Obamacare in the summer town halls, are viewed more favorably than the Democratic Party. 

"Forty-one percent of Americans have a favorable opinion of the Tea Party movement, to 35 percent for Obama's party. Only 24 percent view Tea Party activists unfavorably, while 45 percent hold a negative view of the Democrats."

 
 
— Pat Buchanan, Syndicated Columnist and Founding Editor, The American Conservative Magazine
— Pat Buchanan, Syndicated Columnist and Founding Editor, The American Conservative Magazine
Posted December 22, 2009 • 08:47 AM
 
 
On Presidential Leadership and Health Care "Reform" Legislation:
 
 

"Barack Obama's quest for historic health care legislation has turned into a parody of leadership. We usually associate presidential leadership with the pursuit of goals that, though initially unpopular, serve America's long-term interests. Obama has reversed this. He's championing increasingly unpopular legislation that threatens the country's long-term interests. ‘This isn't about me,' he likes to say, ‘I have great health insurance.’ But of course, it is about him: about the legacy he covets as the president who achieved ‘universal’ health insurance. He'll be disappointed… 

"So Obama's plan amounts to this: partial coverage of the uninsured; modest improvements (possibly) in their health; sizable budgetary costs worsening a bleak outlook; significant, unpredictable changes in insurance markets; weak spending control. This is a bad bargain. Benefits are overstated, costs understated. This legislation is a monstrosity; the country would be worse for its passage. What it's become is an exercise in political symbolism: Obama's self-indulgent crusade to seize the liberal holy grail of ‘universal coverage.’ What it's not is leadership."

 
 
— Robert J. Samuelson, Newsweek and Washington Post Contributing Editor
— Robert J. Samuelson, Newsweek and Washington Post Contributing Editor
Posted December 21, 2009 • 08:20 AM
 
 
On the Truth Behind the Copenhagen Climate Change Conference:
 
 

"When you slice through the blather about marooned bears and melting ice caps, oceans rising and cities sinking, global warming is a racket and a crock. It is all about money and power.

"Copenhagen has always been about an endless transfer of wealth from America, Europe and Japan and creation of a global bureaucracy to control the pace of world economic and industrial development."

 
 
— Pat Buchanan, Syndicated Columnist and Founding Editor, The American Conservative Magazine
— Pat Buchanan, Syndicated Columnist and Founding Editor, The American Conservative Magazine
Posted December 18, 2009 • 09:00 AM
 
 
On the Democrats' December Rush:
 
 

"Rushing to lock the nation into expensive health care and climate change commitments, Democrats are in an understandable frenzy because public enthusiasm for both crusades has been inversely proportional to the time the public has had to think about them. And the president pushing this agenda has, with his incontinent hunger for attention, seen his job approval vary inversely with his ubiquity."

 
 
— George F. Will, Nationally Syndicated Columnist
— George F. Will, Nationally Syndicated Columnist
Posted December 17, 2009 • 09:01 AM
 
 
On the (Hidden) Need for Speedy Passage of the Democrats' Health Care Reform Legislation:
 
 

"It is symbolic of the Senate's health-care bill that the section titled 'No lifetime or annual limits' would allow insurance companies to impose annual dollar limits on medical care -- meaning that patients in need of expensive cancer treatment, for example, could still be bankrupted.

"Democratic health reform legislation promises everything to everyone while imposing a series of hidden burdens to make a massive new entitlement affordable, at least on paper. So its authors are in a game of beat the clock: Pass the legislation before those burdens are fully disclosed to the public."

 
 
— Michael Gerson, Institute for Global Engagement Senior Research Fellow and Washington Post Op-Ed Columnist
— Michael Gerson, Institute for Global Engagement Senior Research Fellow and Washington Post Op-Ed Columnist
Posted December 16, 2009 • 08:32 AM
 
 
On History-Making Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV):
 
 

"Harry Reid can rightly claim to be making history.

"If he passes health-care reform, he'll depend on a series of historic 'firsts.' It'd be the first time Congress had passed a major new entitlement program without bipartisan support; it'd be the first time it passed such a program without popular support; and the first time it passed such a program without knowing or particularly caring what's in it."

 
 
— Rich Lowry, National Review Editor
— Rich Lowry, National Review Editor
Posted December 15, 2009 • 08:41 AM
 
 
On the Senate Minority's Power to Derail Health Care Reform Legislation:
 
 

"The Senate, unlike the House of Representatives, has parliamentary rules and procedures that give the minority the ability to stall legislation. In fact, unlike the House, the minority have the ability to virtually paralyze the Senate. Doing so is not something we would want or expect for every bad bill that comes through Congress, but the proposed healthcare legislation is probably the worst piece of legislation ever considered by the United States Congress. It is the most intrusive, most damaging, most costly, most dangerous bill to the economic and personal freedom and liberty of individual Americans that Congress has ever considered. If there is any bill that deserves being stopped by shutting down the Senate, it is this one."

 
 
— Erik Erickson, RedState Editor-in-Chief
— Erik Erickson, RedState Editor-in-Chief
Posted December 14, 2009 • 08:31 AM
 
 
On EPA Regulation of Carbon Emissions:
 
 

"On the day Copenhagen opened, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency claimed jurisdiction over the regulation of carbon emissions by declaring them an 'endangerment' to human health.

"Since we operate an overwhelmingly carbon-based economy, the EPA will be regulating practically everything. No institution that emits more than 250 tons of CO2 a year will fall outside EPA control. This means over a million building complexes, hospitals, plants, schools, businesses and similar enterprises. (The EPA proposes regulating emissions only above 25,000 tons, but it has no such authority.) Not since the creation of the Internal Revenue Service has a federal agency been given more intrusive power over every aspect of economic life."

 
 
— Charles Krauthammer, Syndicated Columnist
— Charles Krauthammer, Syndicated Columnist
Posted December 11, 2009 • 09:26 AM
 
Notable Quote   
 
"'You better get ready for ... war.' Across the country, radicals are openly planning for the next stage of their movement, and notably, the Democratic establishment is not part of their plans. Despite the talk of a 'Big Tent Party,' socialists are riding high on a surge of support and talking purges and revolution.In Chicago, radicals gathered for a conference on Marxism during what many view as…[more]
 
 
— Jonathan Turley, Fox News Media contributor and the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University
 
Liberty Poll   

As everyday American politics approach "daggers at dawn; press conference to follow" territory, do you want to engage more or less?