|
|
|
18 April 2024
Ike Brannon, Economist, President of Capital Policy Analytics and a Senior Fellow at the Jack Kemp Foundation, discusses the proposed acquisition of U.S. Steel by Nippon Steel, why the merger would not undermine national security as some opponents claim, how it will keep jobs in the U.S., and what history should teach us about the impact on government overreach and restraints on foreign investments.
0:00
0:00
Related Podcasts
09 January 2025
Ryan Young, Senior Economist and Trade Policy Expert at the Competitive Enterprise Institute, discusses last year’s regulatory highlights (and low points), the regulatory outlook for 2025, including the potential impact of DOGE on the volume of federal regulations, and President Biden’s baseless decision to block Nippon Steel’s purchase of U.S. Steel.
31 August 2018
Robert F. McDowell, Partner with Cooley LLP and Former FCC Commissioner, discusses the global significance of the proposed T-Mobile-Sprint merger and the positive impact it could have for consumers, innovation and labor markets.
31 August 2018
Tori K. Whiting, Jay Van Andel Trade Economist and Roe Institute for Economic Policy Studies at The Heritage Foundation, discusses the breakthrough in NAFTA talks with Mexico, the obstacles that remain for a stronger NAFTA and whether Canada will rejoin negotiations.
30 June 2017
Sally Pipes, President and CEO of the Pacific Research Institute, discusses the Better Care Reconciliation Act unveiled by Senate Republicans last week, what's good with it, what's bad with it, and whether Congress is rushing through a bill that is not the best for Americans.
26 February 2016
Seth Cooper, Senior Fellow at The Free State Foundation, discusses what is wrong with the Federal Communications Commission's proposed rule to "unlock set top boxes," how it is going to impact programming and why the government should not be allowed to pick winners and losers.
28 March 2014
David Williams, President of the Taxpayers Protection Alliance, discusses the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) attempt to require groups that comment on FCC issues to disclose their donors and why the proposed rules raise significant First Amendment and privacy concerns.
