Democrats hope to press the "affordability" issue in this year's midterm election season, but there'…
CFIF on X CFIF on YouTube
Inflation: Comparing Trump and Biden...

Democrats hope to press the "affordability" issue in this year's midterm election season, but there's one potentially glaring problem for them, as illustrated by our friends at Unleash Prosperity...

[caption id="" align="alignleft" width="668"] Biden Versus Trump on Inflation[/caption]

 …[more]

August 17, 2026 • 04:40 PM
Home Jester's Courtroom Teen Sues Manufacturer and Friend After Fireworks Accident
Teen Sues Manufacturer and Friend After Fireworks Accident Print
Monday, June 27 2011

A New Jersey teen who was injured in a fireworks accident last Fourth of July is suing the fireworks manufacturer and the friend who crossed state lines to buy $1,200 worth of fireworks. Fireworks are illegal in New Jersey.

According to court documents filed in Superior Court of Ocean County, 19-year-old Thomas Eldershaw was helping his friend set off fireworks at last year’s party when an aerial shell misfired, “sending a tennis-ball sized projectile into (his) eye and face.”  Eldershaw’s face was burned and he was left partially blind from the accident.

In the lawsuit, Eldershaw seeks unspecified damages and contends that the manufacturer, Sky King Fireworks, is liable in part because it signed a consent order several years earlier indicating that it would not solicit New Jersey residents to purchase fireworks in Pennsylvania.  The lawsuit states that on June 9, 2010, the store sold fireworks to Eldershaw’s friend without “clearly or conspicuously” disclosing their illegality.

According to news reports, a call to Sky King’s corporate headquarters in Florida was not returned.

“Consumer fireworks are safe when they’re used properly,” said Julie L. Heckman, executive director of the American Pyrotechnics Association. “Typically, when something goes amiss it’s because the users didn’t follow the directions.”

—Source:  nj.com

Notable Quote   
 
"The U.S. Supreme Court will kick off its 2026 term next week with what will be one of its biggest cases of the year. And according to several legal specialists, there's much more to the dispute than meets the eye.The case in question is Suncor v. Boulder, which deals with the lawfare that Boulder, Colorado, launched against Suncor Energy companies and the Exxon Mobil Corporation. The city is seeking…[more]
 
 
— Shawn Fleetwood, Teh Federalist
 
Liberty Poll   

Based on the meteoric development of AI, do you believe that your job is going to be threatened or enhanced?