Democrats hope to press the "affordability" issue in this year's midterm election season, but there'…
CFIF on X CFIF on YouTube
Inflation: Comparing Trump and Biden...

Democrats hope to press the "affordability" issue in this year's midterm election season, but there's one potentially glaring problem for them, as illustrated by our friends at Unleash Prosperity... Biden Versus Trump on Inflation

 …[more]

August 17, 2026 • 04:40 PM
Home Jester's Courtroom No Breakfast for Champions Leads to Lawsuit
No Breakfast for Champions Leads to Lawsuit Print
Wednesday, December 14 2011

A New York personal injury lawyer recently filed a lawsuit against his upscale NYC gym because it stopped serving breakfast. 

Richard Katz is suing New York City's Setai Club & Spa Wall Street, claiming their misleading actions were illegal, despicable, reckless, malicious, deliberate and immoral.  Katz, who pays a $5,000 annual membership fee, states in his complaint that the gym promised “full complimentary breakfast” knowing that they would not be able to make good on the offer and that Katz relied on that promise to his detriment.

"It was a full-blown hotel breakfast," said Katz, 53, who lives in the West Village with his wife.  "I'd go to the gym in the morning, have a spa and a nice quiet breakfast and do some work -- they mucked it all up."

Katz is seeking $750,000 in damages.

—Source:  abovethelaw.com

Notable Quote   
 
"Writing in the Wall Street Journal last week, former Fidelity Investments head Robert Pozen wrote what he always has, and that countless budget and Social Security scolds have written before him. According to Pozen and a Rose Bowl-sized collection of commentators who've come before and who've yet to come, a combination of benefit cuts and 'revenue measures' (yes, tax increases on the richest…[more]
 
 
— John Tamny, Editor of RealClearMarkets, President of the Parkview Institute, and Senior Fellow at the Market Institute
 
Liberty Poll   

Should there be a full-scale investigation of the Alaska Senate race in which a candidate with virtually the same name as the incumbent was recruited into the race to induce voter confusion.