Democrats hope to press the "affordability" issue in this year's midterm election season, but there'…
CFIF on X CFIF on YouTube
Inflation: Comparing Trump and Biden...

Democrats hope to press the "affordability" issue in this year's midterm election season, but there's one potentially glaring problem for them, as illustrated by our friends at Unleash Prosperity...

[caption id="" align="alignleft" width="668"] Biden Versus Trump on Inflation[/caption]

 …[more]

August 17, 2026 • 04:40 PM
Home Jester's Courtroom Fine Imposed for Filing Frivolous Lawsuits
Fine Imposed for Filing Frivolous Lawsuits Print
Thursday, February 04 2010

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit dismissed a plaintiff’s appeal on grounds that it was frivolous and ordered her to pay a sanction of $105.

According to an opinion issued by a three-judge panel of the appellate court, plaintiff Maureen Greene was originally banned from filing additional cases by a lower district court because she continued to file meritless lawsuits.  Over the last twelve years, Greene brought a variety of civil rights cases against numerous employers and did not prevail in any of them.

The district court said that Greene has “abused judicial process, wasted limited judicial resources and has cost the numerous parties she has sued thousands of dollars in unnecessary attorneys’ fees.”

In upholding the lower court’s decision, the appellate court issued the following notice:  “The clerk of this court and the clerks of all federal district courts within this
Circuit are DIRECTED to refuse to file any pro se civil complaint or appeal by Greene unless she submits proof of satisfaction of this penalty. Greene should review any pending appeals to ensure that they are not frivolous.”

—Source: The Independent Weekly (New Orleans) and U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Notable Quote   
 
"The U.S. Supreme Court will kick off its 2026 term next week with what will be one of its biggest cases of the year. And according to several legal specialists, there's much more to the dispute than meets the eye.The case in question is Suncor v. Boulder, which deals with the lawfare that Boulder, Colorado, launched against Suncor Energy companies and the Exxon Mobil Corporation. The city is seeking…[more]
 
 
— Shawn Fleetwood, Teh Federalist
 
Liberty Poll   

Based on the meteoric development of AI, do you believe that your job is going to be threatened or enhanced?