Today, continuing our longstanding opposition to the ruination of American healthcare by importing foreign…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
CFIF Joins 75-Group National & State Coalition Opposing Socialized Medicine and Importation of Foreign Price Controls

Today, continuing our longstanding opposition to the ruination of American healthcare by importing foreign price controls and socialized medicine, CFIF proudly joins a 75-group coalition letter to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services opposing the interim final rule to implement the "Most Favored Nation" (MFN) model under Section 1115A of the Social Security Act, which forces physicians, patients and providers into a mandatory demonstration under the ObamaCare Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMMI), and which ties prices paid for medicines in Medicare Part B to the prices paid in socialized healthcare systems of foreign nations.

Specifically, the letter explains in detail how the rule will do nothing to stop foreign freeloading off of American pharmaceutical innovation…[more]

January 25, 2021 • 04:53 PM

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Jester's CourtroomLegal tales stranger than stranger than fiction: Ridiculous and sometimes funny lawsuits plaguing our courts.
Home Press Room CFIF Urges Withdrawal of "Most Favored Nation" Executive Order
CFIF Urges Withdrawal of "Most Favored Nation" Executive Order Print
Monday, November 16 2020

 November 16, 2020

The Honorable Donald J. Trump 
President of the United States 
The White House 
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW 
Washington, DC 20500

Dear President Trump,

On behalf of our more than 300,000 activists and supporters across the country, the Center for Individual Freedom (CFIF) urges you to halt implementation of and immediately withdraw the “most favored nation” (MFN) executive order that will impose foreign price controls on American medicines. 

The executive order relies on an International Pricing Index (IPI) to determine “most favored nation” pricing for Medicare Parts B and D drugs, meaning the price controls of foreign nations, many of which have socialized medicine systems, will control reimbursement rates here in the United States. 

More than 80 free-market and center-right organizations, led by Americans for Tax Reform and including CFIF, remain united in our strong opposition to the order. As that massive coalition wrote a few months ago, “Adopting these price controls will slow medical innovation, threaten American jobs, and undermine criticism of single-payer systems. In addition, a United States embrace of price controls will make it immeasurably more difficult to get foreign countries to pay their own way in the development of new medicines.”

Moreover, as CFIF pointed out in July when the Administration first announced its executive order, and again when the order was expanded and advanced in September, price controls simply do not work, regardless of the product targeted or the country in which they’re attempted, and real-world experience establishes that pharmaceutical price controls are no different.  

For example, other nations receive far fewer new lifesaving and life-improving drugs than American consumers, which enjoyed access to 96% of all new cancer drugs over the past decade. In contrast, only 56% of those same drugs became available in Canada, merely 50% became available in Japan and only 11% in Greece, as just three examples. The MFN order threatens that access.

Finally, the MFN executive order contradicts the preferences of U.S. consumers and voters regarding the general role of government in health care. A recent national survey conducted by Public Opinion Strategies for CFIFmeasured the health care priorities of voters nationally and in 12 key swing states ahead of the November 2020 election.  It found that “voters, across party, overwhelmingly prefer the role of the federal government to be that of providing oversight and incentives to health care providers, prescription drug companies and health insurers to encourage competition to lower prices in the health care system (70%) rather than having the federal government set prices and determine what services and medicines are covered by private health plans (30%).”   

For those reasons and others, we again strongly encourage you to halt implementation of the MFN executive order and withdraw it.

Thank you for your time and consideration on this important issue.

Sincerely, 
/s/
Jeffrey Mazzella
President 
 
Related Articles :
Question of the Week   
Which one of the following was eulogized as “First in war, first in peace, and first in the hearts of his countrymen”?
More Questions
Quote of the Day   
 
"The joke survives the test of time and, under the circumstances, deserves repeating. As the late journalist Mickey Carroll told it, a suburban town with a population 90 percent Irish and 10 percent Jewish held a mayoral election involving two candidates -- one Irish and one Jewish.The Irish candidate won with -- wouldn't you know it? -- 90 percent of the vote. Whereupon he immediately denounced the…[more]
 
 
—Michael Goodwin, New York Post on FOX News
— Michael Goodwin, New York Post on FOX News
 
Liberty Poll   

Would a federally mandated $15 an hour minimum wage have a positive or negative impact on your state's overall economy?