Among the foremost threats to individual freedom in America is the abusive and oftentimes lawless behavior…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
More Legal Shenanigans from the Biden Administration’s Department of Education

Among the foremost threats to individual freedom in America is the abusive and oftentimes lawless behavior of federal administrative agencies, whose vast armies of overpaid bureaucrats remain unaccountable for their excesses.

Among the most familiar examples of that bureaucratic abuse is the Department of Education (DOE).  Recall, for instance, the United States Supreme Court’s humiliating rebuke last year of the Biden DOE’s effort to shift hundreds of billions of dollars of student debt from the people who actually owed them onto the backs of American taxpayers.

Even now, despite that rebuke, the Biden DOE launched an alternative scheme last month in an end-around effort to achieve that same result.

Well, the Biden DOE is now attempting to shift tens of millions of dollars of…[more]

March 18, 2024 • 03:11 PM

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Home Press Room CFIF Joins Coalition Opposing Financial Transactions Tax
CFIF Joins Coalition Opposing Financial Transactions Tax Print
Tuesday, March 09 2021

In a letter to Congress, the Center for Indiviudal Freedom ("CFIF") today joined a coalition of nearly 30 organizations and activists, led by Americans for Tax Reform, urging opposition to implementation of a financial transactions tax (FTT) on American savers and investors.

Read the letter below.


VIEW LETTER AS A PDF

Dear Member of Congress, 

On behalf of millions of taxpayers and investors across the country, we urge you to reject any proposal to implement a financial transactions tax (FTT) on American savers and investors.

The Left has seized on the recent GameStop trading controversy to call for a “small” FTT that could purportedly increase federal revenues by $1 trillion over the next decade. This would impose a 0.1 percent tax rate on all buying and selling of stocks, bonds, and other financial instruments.

While progressives such as Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) argue that an FTT is needed to reduce market volatility and make Wall Street pay “their fair share,” this tax will actually harm millions of Americans that invest their lifesavings in the stock market and own 401(k)s, pensions, and index funds.

An FTT is a tax on American savers and investors. It will harm Americans across the country including the 53 percent of American households that own stock and the 80 to 100 million Americans that have a 401(k). This tax will fall especially hard on public sector pensions including those used by teachers, firefighters, and police officers.

In fact, an FTT would cost pension funds billions of dollars every year, leading to fewer savings, less retirement income for retirees, and underfunded pensions.  According to a 2021 study conducted by the Modern Markets Initiative, an FTT could cost a 401(k) owner $45,000 to $65,000 in savings over the lifetime of the account.    

An FTT might not raise the revenue supporters claim it does. The Congressional Budget Office found that imposing an FTT in the U.S. would “decrease the volume of transactions” and “probably reduce output and employment.” Some have predicted that a financial transactions tax would raise little net revenue because of these negative impacts.  

FTTs also cause capital to flee to jurisdictions that do not tax transactions, further reducing revenues. When Italy and France imposed FTTs in 2012, both countries raised less than a quarter of expected revenues.   

FTTs have a history of failure. When Sweden imposed a financial transaction tax, it lasted just six years as trading migrated to London to avoid the tax. Not only did this mean the FTT raised little revenue, capital gains tax revenue also dropped because of a reduction in sales. When it was abolished in 1990, investment began to return to Sweden. 

Sweden is not an isolated case. According to the Center for Capital Markets, Spain, the Netherlands, Germany, Norway, Portugal, Italy, Denmark, Japan, Austria, and France have all tried an FTT in past decades. In each case, the tax failed to raise revenue, reduced trades, and has since been repealed.  

Advocates of an FTT falsely argue it is needed to curb short selling and market volatility. There is no evidence that short-selling would shrink relative to overall trading under an FTT, but even if it did, short selling is not responsible for market crashes and economic downturns. Instead, it is a function of the free market.

Some investors will short a stock when they think it is overvalued. Other investors, as shown as the recent rallies in GameStop and other companies, will buy a stock they think is too heavily shorted. Both practices help promote efficient investing and provide information to markets, ultimately softening the blow of a downturn.

For example, the 2008 market crash could have been far more widespread if short sellers hadn’t recognized the housing market was overvalued.

Arbitrarily restricting this trading will likely lead to severe pain if the country experiences another crash. Rather than improving market volatility, an FTT could make this problem worse as there would be fewer buyers and sellers and therefore more price jumps.

Congress should reject any proposal to implement a financial transaction tax. An FTT is the latest attempt by the Left to take advantage of a “crisis” to implement a massive new tax on the American people. Contrary to their rhetoric, this tax would be borne by the American people, not Wall Street. It would punish investment, leading to lower returns for American retirees and savers and increased market volatility. It fails to raise as much revenue as supporters claim and has failed everywhere it has been tried in past decades.

Sincerely,

Grover Norquist         
President, Americans for Tax Reform
 
David Williams
President, Taxpayers Protection Alliance
 
Pete Sepp
President, National Taxpayers Union
 
James L. Martin
Founder/Chairman, 60 Plus Association
 
Saulius “Saul” Anuzis
President, 60 Plus Association
 
Phil Kerpen
President, American Commitment
 
Lisa B. Nelson
CEO, ALEC Action   
 
Brent Wm. Gardner
Chief Government Affairs Officer, Americans for Prosperity
 
John Toedtman 
Executive Director, Caesar Rodney Institute 
 
Ryan Ellis
President, Center for a Free Economy
 
Andrew F. Quinlan
President, Center for Freedom and Prosperity 
 
Jeffrey Mazzella
President, Center for Individual Freedom
 
Thomas A. Schatz
President, Citizens Against Government Waste
 
David McIntosh
President, Club for Growth
 
John Berlau
Senior Fellow, Competitive Enterprise Institute
 
Adam Brandon
President, FreedomWorks
 
George Landrith,
President, Frontiers of Freedom
 
Jessica Anderson
Executive Director, Heritage Action for America
 
Mario H. Lopez 
President, Hispanic Leadership Fund
 
Andrew Langer
President, Institute for Liberty
 
Sal Nuzzo
Vice President of Policy, The James Madison Institute 
 
Seton Motley
President, Less Government
 
Tim Jones
Fmr. Speaker, Missouri House of Representatives
Chair, Missouri Center-Right Coalition
 
Doug Kellogg
Executive Director, Ohioans for Tax Reform
 
Paul Gessing
President, Rio Grande Foundation
 
James L. Setterlund
Executive Director, Shareholder Advocacy Forum
 
Karen Kerrigan
President & CEO, Small Business & Entrepreneurship Council

 

Related Articles :
Notable Quote   
 
"It's a rematch.President Biden and former President Trump each hit a key marker last week, clinching enough delegates to become the presumptive nominee of their respective party.The outcome of the general election will come down to a handful of states, as usual.The map maintained by The Hill and Decision Desk HQ lists seven contests as toss-ups."Read the entire article here.…[more]
 
 
— Niall Stanage, The Hill
 
Liberty Poll   

Do you support or oppose a government-imposed U.S. ban of TikTok?