After the United States Supreme Court ruling this past June finally and rightfully overturning “Chevron…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
Why Not Put Students and Taxpayers First?

After the United States Supreme Court ruling this past June finally and rightfully overturning “Chevron Deference,” one might hope that federal agencies and the bureaucrats who populate them in Washington, D.C. would recognize and respect the new limitations on their previous excesses.

The ruling struck a major blow against administrative state overreach.  And while the Court’s decision specifically dealt with agencies’ rulemaking process and the ability to interpret statutes however they like, hopefully it and similar previous rulings will start imposing desperately needed guardrails to prevent rouge agency action.

The Unites States Department of Education (DOE) offers a textbook example of that sort of rogue behavior.   Many cogently contend that the DOE shouldn’t even…[more]

September 11, 2024 • 08:39 PM

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Press Releases
CFIF Launches “IP Protection Matters” Podcast Print E-mail
Tuesday, August 27 2024

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, the Center for Individual Freedom (CFIF) formally launched IP Protection Matters, a new podcast interview series examining notable issues related to the protection of and threats to intellectual property (IP). 

IP Protection Matters is hosted by Renee Giachino, CFIF’s general counsel and longtime radio show and podcast host. It includes interviews with leading legal scholars, policy experts, public officials and others about the latest cutting-edge research, legislative issues, regulatory activity and other notable IP-related topics.  

Initial guests on the IP Protection Matters podcast include Andrei Iancu, Former Undersecretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Brad Watts, Vice President for Patents and Innovation Policy at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce's Global Innovation Policy Center, James Edwards, Founder and Executive Director of Conservatives for Property Rights, and Patrick Kilbride, noted expert in IP and innovation policy and current Policy Fellow with the Center for American Principles, among others. 

“Intellectual property rights – patents, copyrights, trademarks and trade secrets – alongside physical property rights, offer the critical distinguishing factor explaining American Exceptionalism,” said Ms.  Giachino. “Our Founding Fathers valued IP so much that they specifically protected it in Article I, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution. President Abraham Lincoln, a patent owner himself, later observed that IP ‘added the fuel of interest to the fire of genius.’ 

“I’m excited about the new IP Protection Matters podcast and engaging with some of the brightest and most knowledgeable IP experts in the nation to highlight the underreported importance of IP and examine ways to protect it in order to assure future American preeminence,” Giachino said. 

“Unfortunately, IP rights and protections are under increasing and constant attack,” added CFIF President Jeffrey Mazzella. “From politically motivated efforts to extinguish existing patents held by inventors to jeopardizing the economic incentive for continued innovation going forward, significant threats to IP protections exist at all levels of government – both domestically and abroad. The IP Protection Matters podcast provides an approachable and engaging platform to analyze and discuss these important issues,” Mazzella concluded.

Listen to all interviews on the IP Protection Matters website and on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. IP Protection Matters will be accessible on additional podcast platforms in the coming weeks.  

Founded in 1998, CFIF is a constitutional and free-market advocacy organization with over 300,000 supporters and activists nationwide.

###

 


Page 1 of 273
Notable Quote   
 
"Candidate questionnaires have long been a part of American politics, locking in politicians to certain policies, pledges and positions. But it has been decades since one has threatened to roil a presidential race, or undercut a major party nominee's carefully crafted image. ...But Kamala Harris is facing the real possibility that the candidate questionnaire she filled out for the American Civil Liberties…[more]
 
 
— John Solomon, Chief Executive Officer and Editor in Chief of Just the News
 
Liberty Poll   

Will the televised Harris/Trump debate have a significant, lasting impact on the presidential race, or quickly fade as other issues dominate voting decisions?