The Washington Examiner reports that GOP presidential candidate Jon Huntsman is trying to retrace the steps Senator John McCain (R-AZ) took to the 2008 nomination. Citing his moderate stances on just about everything, Huntsman and his advisors (many former McCain hands) avoiding the conservative-dominated Iowa caucuses and hoping for “a good showing” in the New Hampshire primary. Thereafter Huntsman hopes to win the South Carolina and Florida primaries with a pure economic message.
What a riot. McCain was the undisputed national security candidate last time around, and was able to paper over many of his moderate-to-liberal heresies with a compelling military background. By contrast, Huntsman has been a well-connected ambassador to the Far East (China and Singapore), and has never served in uniform, let alone suffered torture. Moreover, McCain won the New Hampshire primary by 6 percentage points over Romney. Alternatively, Huntsman wants a “good showing”? Hopefully, that’s more than the 1.8 percent he’s polling nationally, or else he won’t make it to South Carolina.
The truth about the Huntsman campaign is that it features a candidate in search of a constituency. Anyone in the Republican Party who is repelled by the Tea Party and trusts Wall Street more than Main Street is already voting for Mitt Romney. Huntsman is a slightly different version of the same formula.
If history is any guide, the GOP tends to give the presidential nomination to the next guy in line. In 2008 it was John McCain. In 2012, it will be Mitt Romney. Only a big name with big money like Texas Governor Rick Perry or Michelle Bachmann seems poised to spoil the party. Refusing to campaign to an entire wing of the Republican base by skipping the Iowa caucuses isn’t at bottom a campaign strategy – it’s an acknowledgement that Jon Huntsman is the answer to a presidential question no one is asking.
CFIF on Twitter
CFIF on YouTube