Question: What happens when a majority of countries at the United Nations support a treaty, but delegations representing half the world’s population do not?
Answer: An agreement that won’t be enforced fairly across the globe.
It gets worse. The dissenting half is made up of the governments most likely to violate the treaty.
The document in question is the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT), the vehicle of international gun control advocates to monitor and limit weapons transfers between countries. But while the United States, considered the country with the best such system in place, is now a signatory, serial violators such as Syria, North Korea, and Iran, as well as major arms dealing countries such as Russia and China, are not.
So, what we have here is a treaty that will bind only the governments that already take arms transfer seriously, while having no effect on the governments most likely to violate its terms.
As an added bonus, there’s enough loose language in the treaty to leave room for an enterprising UN bureaucrat or two to create a global firearms registry applicable to every signatory, potentially putting American gun owners’ Second Amendment rights at the mercy of foreign gun control interests.
Not a banner week for the U.S. diplomatic mission to the U.N.
CFIF on Twitter
CFIF on YouTube