In the rush to secure enough votes to pass the comprehensive health care “reform” bill before Christmas, Democrats in the Senate seem to agree that while a “public option” is out, an “individual mandate” is most certainly in. Simply put, if passed, every American would be required by federal law to purchase health insurance or pay a fine. Although there are some subtle distinctions between then Governor Romney’s proposal and a “pure” individual mandate, after only three years in effect, the Massachusetts legislature opted for purity over subtlety. Thus, the result of Romney’s carefully crafted compromise turned into the blueprint for the first iteration of ObamaCare.
How odd it would be for Romney if his presidential prospects depended on the success or failure of the Democrats’ version of universal health care. Already, libertarian and conservative commentators are starting to make the connection between the federal bill and Massachusetts. Come the primaries, it will take a nanosecond for opposition researchers and spin doctors to lash ObamaCare to RomneyCare. If they do, and the current distaste for nuance still prevails, Romney’s likely explanations of this-but-no-further policy making could be his undoing.
CFIF on Twitter
CFIF on YouTube