Chicago: The City Council That Never Sleeps
Never underestimate the speed and focus possible when the politicos in charge of government set their minds to getting something done. Less than four days after the United States Supreme Court said that the U.S. Constitution’s 2nd Amendment applied to states and municipalities like Chicago, the Second City’s aldermen rose to the challenge.
Unfortunately, they responded by deliberately passing a law to discriminate against gun owners to the maximum extent the Constitution might allow. (Lost amid most of the coverage this week on the result in McDonald v. City of Chicago is that Justice Alito’s plurality opinion announces only that the 2nd Amendment right to bear arms applies to Chicago. It leaves to lower courts the careful work of figuring out which gun control laws are in fact unconstitutional.)
Let’s try a mind experiment. Suppose a controversial Supreme Court opinion came down applying a universal right guaranteed in the Constitution against states and municipalities that had to do with, oh, let’s say…racial discrimination. If the losing city in the decision responded in less than four days with an ordinance that deliberately tried to see how far it could still discriminate and pass constitutional muster, would that city council be lauded for its activism?
Maybe there’s a North Coast bias.
CFIF on Twitter
CFIF on YouTube