…And Speaking of Big Labor, WaPo’s Harold Myerson Does Some Water-Carrying
Why is it that defenders of the Big Labor agenda never seem to engage in honest, straightforward, factual debate?
Washington Post columnist Harold Myerson provides the latest illustration in his commentary today. Myerson carries Big Labor’s water by arguing that FedEx, which is a longtime target of Big Labor’s ire due to its failure to capitulate to union campaigns, should be regulated in the same way as more heavily-unionized UPS. UPS falls under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), whereas FedEx falls under the Railway Labor Act (RLA).
And for very good reason.
Approximately 85% of FedEx parcels are shipped by air, whereas UPS delivers 85% of its packages locally via truck. That makes FedEx subject to the RLA, and UPS to the NLRA, which Congress specifically determined. But Myerson, unsurprisingly, avoids mentioning this critical distinction in his column. As one predictable consequence of UPS’s NLRA classification, it was brutalized by a costly 1997 strike. So now, UPS, Congressional liberals and Big Labor seek to cripple FedEx by shoehorning it into the same classification as UPS.
UPS seems to follow the adage “if you can’t beat ’em, unionize ’em,” but it would be nice if Big Labor and its apologists could at least argue honestly once in a while.
CFIF on Twitter
CFIF on YouTube