Extreme Hostility Against Race-Neutral Law Enforcement
Below is a section of the IG report on the Civil Rights Division of the Justice Department, amply confirming longstanding allegations by Christian Adams, Chris Coates, Hans von Spakovsky, and others that the division is full of people who are openly hostile to the very notion that civil rights laws merit race-neutral enforcement. The section is chilling.
B. Treatment of Members of the Noxubee Case Team (2006-07)As discussed in detail in Chapter Three, in 2006 the Voting Section fileda complaint under Sections 2 and 11(b) of the Voting Rights Act against theNoxubee County (Mississippi) Democratic Election Committee and itschairman, Ike Brown. The Noxubee case was developed and litigated by thenSpecial Litigation Counsel Christopher Coates along with two trial attorneysand an intern. This was the Department’s first lawsuit under Section 2 of theVRA against Black defendants alleging denial or abridgment of the rights ofWhite voters on account of race. Numerous witnesses told us that there waswidespread opposition to the Noxubee case among the Voting Section careerstaff because it was being brought against Black defendants on behalf of Whitevoters. We found that as a result of their hostility to the Noxubee case, somecareer staff harassed a Black Voting Section intern who volunteered to travel toMississippi to assist the trial team, and mocked Coates for his work on thecase.The intern told the OIG that two career Voting Section employees madedisparaging comments directly to him about his involvement in the trial. Inparticular, the intern recalled being questioned directly and indirectly aboutwhy he participated in this trial and told the OIG that Voting Section personnelmade comments like: “You know why they asked you to go down there,” “Theyused you as a token,” and “People are saying, ‘Why did you go down there?’”According to a memorandum drafted by Section management summarizing theincidents, the intern told a Section manager that the Voting Section employeesinformed him that someone who was attending the trial was reporting hisactivities and, therefore, the employees knew exactly where he was sitting inthe courtroom and what he did at the trial.Section Chief Tanner subsequently announced that files on one of the drives would be lockedto prevent employees from accessing such documents without permission. It appears that thedecision to lock the computer files most likely resulted from the discovery of what the teammember had done. However, we were unable to question Tanner regarding this matter becausehe refused to be interviewed by the OIG.121B. Treatment of Members of the Noxubee Case Team (2006-07)
As discussed in detail in Chapter Three, in 2006 the Voting Section filed a complaint under Sections 2 and 11(b) of the Voting Rights Act against the Noxubee County (Mississippi) Democratic Election Committee and its chairman, Ike Brown. The Noxubee case was developed and litigated by thenSpecial Litigation Counsel Christopher Coates along with two trial attorneys and an intern. This was the Department’s first lawsuit under Section 2 of the VRA against Black defendants alleging denial or abridgment of the rights of White voters on account of race. Numerous witnesses told us that there was widespread opposition to the Noxubee case among the Voting Section career staff because it was being brought against Black defendants on behalf of White voters. We found that as a result of their hostility to the Noxubee case, some career staff harassed a Black Voting Section intern who volunteered to travel to Mississippi to assist the trial team, and mocked Coates for his work on the case.
The intern told the OIG that two career Voting Section employees made disparaging comments directly to him about his involvement in the trial. In particular, the intern Read more…
CFIF on Twitter
CFIF on YouTube