January 28th, 2011 at 11:26 am
Thune Swoon
It’s funny to whom the media chooses to give a pass in political coverage. Conservative Senator John Thune (R-SD) has some in the Beltway crowd buzzing about an imminent presidential run, but the rationales given thus far should make thoughtful voters wary of jumping on the Thune 2012 bandwagon just yet. From Time:
For some Republicans, Thune is the answer to their anxieties: the current crop of GOP contenders is dangerously weak, party leaders privately grumble. (Mitt Romney? Been there. Sarah Palin? Too divisive. Tim Pawlenty? Yawn.) His fans say Thune, 50, offers voters a fresh face, a tall and square-jawed profile plus a solid set of conservative credentials. He’s been a GOP hero ever since he unseated then Senate majority leader Tom Daschle in 2004. His home state’s proximity to all-important Iowa doesn’t hurt either. And he has at least one prominent cheerleader in the current Senate Republican leader, Mitch McConnell. “I’m a big John Thune fan,” McConnell said on Jan. 25. “I think he should [run].”
According to this description of Thune’s assets, the gentleman from South Dakota brings height, geography, and conservative positions to the presidency, but little else. If the Republican establishment is looking for their party’s equivalent of Barack Obama (lanky, genial, and bereft of significant policy success), then Thune may be their man. Should Thune run, however, Republican primary voters should insist on specifics from him as a guard against electing the Republican version of Barack Obama (inexperienced, politically tone deaf, and poor legislative skills).
Being a “fresh face” in politics means one doesn’t have the scars that come with surviving important political battles. America is waging a war for her soul; now isn’t the time to elect someone else president because he’s too new to appreciate the old.
January 15th, 2011 at 6:26 pm
NLRB Pushing Card Check Through the Back Door
Here’s more proof the Obama Administration is bent on destroying the sovereignty of states. The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) is threatening to sue South Dakota, Utah, South Carolina, and, of course, Arizona, unless their attorneys general say new state laws protecting secret ballots for union elections are unconstitutional.
The NLRB construes its enabling legislation to allow employees to unionize if a majority signs cards stating that desire. That process is called “card check” and allows union organizers to bypass secret ballots that protect the identities of those who don’t want the union. All four states passed laws last November 2nd to guarantee workers in their borders of the right to a secret ballot. Now, the NLRB says those laws conflict with current federal law, even though card check has not passed into legislation because it’s overwhelmingly opposed in Congress.
In effect, the pro-union forces running the NRLB are trying to do through administrative fiat what they can’t get passed through the legislative process. Unless each state’s attorney general agrees with the NRLB in writing that the new law is unconstitutional, the NRLB will sue the states in federal court. This is the same strategy the Obama Justice Department is using to challenge Arizona’s anti-illegal immigration law Senate Bill 1070.
But tortured legal arguments can’t trump common sense:
Utah Attorney General Mark Shurtleff said he believes the state is on solid ground. He plans to coordinate a response with the other three states.
“If they want to bring a lawsuit, then bring it,” Shurtleff said. “We believe that a secret ballot is as fundamental a right as any American has had since the beginning of this country. We want to protect the constitutional rights of our citizens.”
What’s next in Obamaland? Test oaths?
H/T: Associated Press
Tags: Arizona, Card Check, frivolous lawsuit, National Labor Relations Board, Right to Work, secret ballot, South Carolina, South Dakota, Supremacy Clause, union, Utah
CFIF on Twitter
CFIF on YouTube