If at First You Don’t Succeed, Blame Your Predecessor
That appears to be James Carville’s new strategy amidst the Democratic bloodbath last week. Writing in the Financial Times, Carville argues that Democrats need to end their circular firing squad and start blaming the real culprit behind recent failings … George W. Bush, of course.
President Obama has had more than a year to “fix” the nation, but his attempts at restoring economic growth were littered with the tired and failed ideas of yet another government stimulus plan. His spending schemes and continued bailouts have only exacerbated the unemployment rate, while still spending more than any president in history, including George W. Bush.
What George W. Bush has to do with an election in the most liberal state in the nation is unexplained by Mr. Carville’s article. President Bush’s economic policies did contribute to the deficit and to the unemployment rate but they didn’t make Martha Coakley take a vacation during her campaign or make President Obama ignore the race until it was too late.
For Mr. Carville, President Bush is a convenient boogeyman, but not an explanation for electoral disaster in the Bay State.
CFIF on Twitter
CFIF on YouTube