November 2nd, 2009 at 4:11 pm
Conservative Party? Now There’s An Idea!
When Doug Hoffman wins the special election for NY-23 tomorrow, as he now seems poised to do, much will be written about what that means, and much of that will be meaningless.
What won’t get that much attention is that Hoffman is the candidate of New York’s scrappy Conservative Party, founded in 1962, with the support of William F. Buckley, Jr. Buckley became the Party’s candidate for New York City mayor in 1965, losing as he knew he would, but with great wit and that wonderful twinkle in his eye.
The Party, with its own ballot line, is a political force, for decades under the savvy, never-blinking, steadfastly conservative leadership of Mike Long. Hoffman’s win will be a rare, single line victory, but that diminishes not at all the influence New York’s Conservative Party has been able to wield over politics even in New York’s liberal wilderness, now aided mightily by the Tea Party brigades.
Have a party tomorrow night, Mike. You and a Conservative Party worthy of the name deserve it.
November 2nd, 2009 at 12:03 pm
Top 5 Reasons Speaker Pelosi’s Health Care Bill Should be Defeated
- $729.5 billion in new taxes and fees on small businesses and individuals.
- $1.055 trillion in new federal spending over the next ten years, according to the Congressional Budget Office.
- 114 million people could lose their current health care coverage, according to the Lewin Group.
- 43 new entitlement programs that the bill creates, expands or extends.
- 3,425 uses of the word “shall” in the legislation.
If you haven’t already done so, please call your representative at 202-224-3121 and tell them to vote “No” on Speaker Pelosi’s health care bill. A vote is expected in the House this week. Learn more about health care here and here.
November 2nd, 2009 at 11:55 am
Obama Unveils Re-Election Strategy
During his closing argument for New Jersey Governor Jon Corzine’s re-election campaign, President Barack Obama moved back the goalposts on when elected leaders should be held accountable for their actions:
Listening to Jon’s opponent, you’d think New Jersey was the only state going through a tough time right now,” Obama told almost 19,000 gathered inside the Prudential Center in Newark. “I have something to report: We have the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression. By the way, that didn’t start under Jon’s watch, that didn’t start under my watch. I wasn’t sworn in yet.”
Obama quipped there was a little revisionist history or selective memory on the part of Republicans and other critics who seek to hold Corzine responsible for New Jersey’s economic woes.
“A little amnesia about how we got into this mess,” Obama explained. “This crisis we are living . . . came about because of the same theories, the same laxed regulation, the same trickle-down economics that the other guy’s party has been peddling for years. And you know, look, we’re not interested in relitigating the past, and I’m more than happy to go and do the work that’s required to get this economy moving again. I think about it every day. Jon Corzine thinks about it every day.”
One problem with Obama’s remarks; Corzine was sworn in before the economic recession hit – by two years. And it’s not like Corzine can say he’s just a community organizer with scant business experience. As head of Goldman Sachs during part of its “master of universe” phase, Corzine – along with former colleague and successor, Hank Paulson – knows how to make money under a lax regulatory system.
In fact, Corzine apparently knows how to “spread the money around” to take care of his former corporation while serving in government.
As for the president, apparently he thinks a re-election campaign is not the right forum to “re-litigate” the past four years of the current administration. Good to know. I guess that means a politician can only be criticized when he’s termed out of office. Thank goodness for Jon Corzine!
November 2nd, 2009 at 11:51 am
While You Were Distracted…
For those worrying about the lack of legislative action in our nation’s capitol, Jonathan Weisman at the Wall Street Journal writes a nice summary of the “other” legislation racing through Congress and landing on President Obama’s desk.
Last week, Mr. Obama signed defense-policy legislation that included an unrelated measure widening federal hate-crimes laws to cover sexual orientation and gender identification — 12 years after it was first introduced. The same legislation also tightened the rules of admissible evidence for military commissions, an issue that consumed Congress in debate in 2007 but received almost no attention this go-round.
Other new measures signed into law since the administration took office, all of which kicked up controversy in past congresses, make it easier for women to sue for equal pay, set aside land in the West from development, give the government the power to regulate tobacco and raise tobacco taxes to expand health insurance for children. Congress and the White House, in the new defense-policy bill, also killed weapons programs that have survived earlier attempts at termination, among them, the F-22 fighter jet, the VH-71 presidential helicopter and the Army’s Future Combat System.
Rob Nabors, the White House’s deputy budget director, called the series of new laws “a very, very quiet but important victory.”
But it’s not like the Republican opposition is asleep at the wheel. According to Rep. Tom Price (R. Ga.), “The administration is pushing so many things so rapidly it’s difficult to concentrate on all of them.” Hopefully, the bills they are concentrating on – health care, energy, education – can be stopped or modified before they too become unqualified Democratic victories.
November 2nd, 2009 at 10:03 am
Morning Links
October 31st, 2009 at 11:09 am
National Sovereignty vs. National Solvency?
So, what happens when a country increases government spending, enlarges its deficit, and causes an international lender to consider stopping payments for what it sees as an abuse of discretion? No, it’s not the Chinese trying to reign in the Obama Administration. But Ukraine’s decision to raise pension payments and its minimum wage is putting pressure on the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to decide whether its lending guidelines have any teeth.
At first blush, the IMF appears to be meddling in the internal affairs of a sovereign country. On further reflection, though, the IMF is really just a lender of other people’s money trying to get an increasingly bad borrower to stop charging the international community’s credit card. The dilemma posed by governments that spend money as though there is no consequence for perpetual deficits is that unlike private parties, a government cannot be foreclosed, bought, and sold. At least, not yet. Ukraine isn’t yet a failed economic state, but if the IMF decides to cut off lending it could be. Who knows; perhaps the Chinese government officials holding all that American debt are taking notes on how to control a client’s spending.
October 31st, 2009 at 10:36 am
How the Berlin Wall Was Actually Opened
There is a fascinating story in today’s Washington Post describing the events that led up to the opening of the Berlin Wall. Although there were many well-documented causes, particular events and their sequence of occurrence had much to do with making November 9, 1989, the day the most visible barrier to human freedom fell. An excerpt:
Even the exact hour mattered: The wall opened when many East German political and military leaders were sequestered in meetings, and many significant Soviet leaders — because of the time difference — were already asleep. What if they’d had time to fortify the borders before the flood of people arrived? As it was, none of them could mount an immediate response, and soon it was too late to undo the events of the evening.
We like to think that all great events have great causes, and obviously long-term political, economic and military forces shaped the Cold War — and how it ended. But momentous events are also a sort of ambush of history, when all those long-term pressures come together in an unexpected way. The opening of the Berlin Wall, largely unintentional, was such an event, an unsettling thought for those who see history as the result of strategy and planning by pivotal leaders.
If only a few things had been different, we might not have such happy memories to celebrate next week. But thanks to the mumbling of a sleep-deprived East German official, some overzealous Western reporting and the willingness of East Germans to risk a trip to the wall, the Cold War reached a swift and peaceful conclusion.”
Read the entire article here.
October 31st, 2009 at 10:12 am
Blair Out as European President
And so Britain continues its decades-long decline in influence. The nation’s candidate to become the first President of Europe is likely defeated, with reports out of Brussels saying that Tony Blair lost because he and his island friends wanted the job too much.
But the anti-Blair front that has developed is merely the result of months of tactical errors by his campaigners. Not only did his envoys not win over Paris and Berlin, but they also, it seems, forgot about the need to get the EU’s smaller states behind them. “To us, it seemed like the game was all about the big boys. But that’s not the way that the EU works any more,” said one diplomat from a Baltic state. “We were not consulted even though we were aware of lobbying for Blair, which had started already way back in the summer, far earlier than anyone else.” The diplomat expressed surprise at this clumsy approach. “It’s very odd, as Tony Blair had a terrific team of EU advisers when he was in power, which is how he got so much done. But clearly that’s changed.”
The campaign for Mr. Blair also suffered from a brazenness that is not in tune with the more subtle approach to diplomacy á la Européenne. Compare Mr Brown’s manoeuvrings to the quiet but effective manoeuvrings of the Dutch team, who have managed to get their man in pole position just by working the EU’s diplomatic ropes like pros.
Lastly, the Blair campaign probably started too early, giving opponents too long to attack. “This is a game about the dark horses who come up at the last minute, not about the early frontrunners,” shrugged one official.”
No bother. Now it’s time to lay the groundwork to become the next UN Secretary General!
October 31st, 2009 at 9:49 am
Video: Government’s Next Takeover Target – the Internet
The FCC recently voted to advance the process to pass “Net Neutrality” regulations, something Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) and others have called “the Fairness Doctrine for the Internet.” CFIF’s Renee Giachino discusses the issue in this week’s Freedom Minute. Watch the video below.
October 30th, 2009 at 12:46 pm
Nancy Pelosi’s “Most Honest, Most Open and Most Ethical Congress in History”
Immediately following the 2006 elections, when Democrats took control of the House of Representatives, then-Speaker-to-be Nancy Pelosi said, “The American people voted to restore integrity and honesty in Washington, D.C., and the Democrats intend to lead the most honest, most open and most ethical Congress in history.”
It wasn’t the first time Pelosi (and other current Congressional leaders) made that promise. Nor was it the last.
Today, nearly three years later, the lead story on Politico.com begins:
A leaked document shows that House ethics investigators are probing the activities of nearly three dozen lawmakers…
“The House ethics committee said Thursday that it was opening two new investigations — one into the foreclosure scandal of Rep. Laura Richardson (D-Calif.) and one involving financial questions about Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) and her husband.
“But shortly after the committee met, chairs Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.) and Jo Bonner (R-Ala.) interrupted proceedings on the House floor to say that an internal document on secret committee proceedings had been leaked to The Washington Post — and that it would name the names of many other members who had drawn the attention of either the committee or the Office of Congressional Ethics.
“According to the Post, the document identifies more than 30 House members.”
Read the full Politico.com story here.
The Washington Post had the scoop. The report by the Post’s Ellen Nakashima and Paul Kane can be read here.
October 30th, 2009 at 12:01 pm
This Week’s Liberty Update
October 30th, 2009 at 10:45 am
Light Morning Reading
For those of you who haven’t had a chance to read Speaker Pelosi’s 1,990 page monstrosity of a health care bill, CFIF has provided a few summaries here and here.
Today, a short one-page document was released covering the major provisions in the health care bill. It is a brief overview organized by page and section. You can read it here.
October 30th, 2009 at 9:06 am
Morning Links
October 29th, 2009 at 10:05 pm
Economic Exhalation
It’s nice to see a piece in Time Magazine worthy of linking to. Over the last few years, Time has led the charge of weekly news magazines becoming equal parts liberal opinion journals and People Magazine derivatives. Newsweek isn’t much better (only George Will and Robert Samuelson redeem it). And U.S. News and World Report has become entirely virtual, while simultaneously losing its only compelling columnist (Michael Barone, who’s now with the D.C. Examiner).
But Time’s new issue features a piece called “What’s Still Wrong With Wall Street” by financial journalist Allan Sloan. If you can get past the purple prose of his first few paragraphs (including a breathless passage about the “green shoots” appearing in the cracked driveways of the newly impoverished) and the occasional populist nonsequitur (Mr. Sloan apparently thinks the financial crisis should relieve him of the need to pay overdraft fees), it’s worth your time.
With great analytical clarity, Sloan explains how TARP wasn’t the real bailout (new federal lending standards were); how the bonuses that the public is crowing about aren’t really bonuses; and how it was incompetence much more than greed that drove the financial collapse. One exemplary passage:
The two divisions at AIG that brought down the firm — financial products and stock-lending — didn’t understand what they were doing. Financial products wrote credit-default swaps — sorry I’m not pausing to explain them, but most eyes would glaze over if I did — that they thought were riskless but turned out to be ultra-risky.
The stock-loan department, AIG’s other disaster, took the cash it got for lending out stock owned by AIG and invested the money in esoteric securities rather than in risk-free Treasuries, the standard practice. The idea was — I’m not kidding — to make an extra one-fifth of 1% in interest. When the esoterica, which the stock-loan folks thought was riskless, crumbled, so did the firm.
It’s an admittedly uneven piece, but the good outweighs the bad. Read the whole thing here.
October 29th, 2009 at 5:19 pm
Headline of the Day
“Exxon’s Profit Drops 68% as Prices Tumble,” according to the Wall Street Journal.
Is it time to move away from the windfall profits tax and start discussing bailouts?
October 29th, 2009 at 2:05 pm
Stimulus Creates Jobs … for Fact-Checkers
An AP story today shows that the Obama Administration overcounted the number of jobs “created or saved” thus far by the stimulus package by about 5,000. That may sound like small change, but not when you realize that the Administration’s entire claim was only 30,000. In other words, one in every six of those jobs is make-believe.
Here’s an intellectual exercise to lay the stimulus bare. It came into effect on February 17 — 254 days ago. Based on the newest estimates that means it’s created about 100 jobs a day (or 2 per day per state). Leaving aside the opportunity cost of pulling the stimulus money out of the private sector, does anybody think that 14 jobs a week is going to pull California out of the morass?
October 29th, 2009 at 1:42 pm
Revenue Provisions in Health Care Bill
The Ways and Means Committee just sent out a summary of all the “revenue enhancements” (err … tax hikes) in the new Pelosi health care bill.
However, these revenue enhancements add up to only ~$565.5 billion, which falls far short of the bill’s $800-$900 billion price tag. The list of “spending cuts” has not yet been released.
Here are some highlights from the summary:
- A $5 billion tax hike achieved through narrowing the definition of a qualified medical deduction. Currently, individuals with medical expenses exceeding 7.5% of adjusted gross income can deduct those expenses for tax purposes, but the House bill severely limits this medical deduction, forcing taxpayers to pay more in out-of-pocket medical expenses.
- A $13.3 billion tax increase achieved through limiting Flexible Spending Accounts (FSA). Under current law, individuals may contribute money to tax-free FSA’s, but the new bill limits this amount, thereby taxing income used for medical expenses.
- $460 billion tax hike on “high-earners.”
- $20 billion tax on the sale or lease of medical devices … because taxing artificial limbs and pacemakers is the “American Way.”
Click here for the Ways and Means summary.
October 29th, 2009 at 11:57 am
Major Tax Provisions in House Bill
- Sec. 345. Income determinations. To determine income, the Health Choices Commissioner uses income data from the individual’s most recent tax return.
- Sec. 501. Tax on individuals without acceptable health care coverage. Provides for a 2.5% additional tax on the modified adjusted gross income of an individual who does not obtain acceptable health coverage…
- Sec. 511. This section also provides for an excise tax that applies to an offering employer if the employer fails to follow the rules governing an offer of coverage.
- Sec. 512. Health care contributions of non-electing employers. Establishes a payroll tax of 8% of the wages that an employer pays to its employees for employers who choose not to offer coverage.
- Sec.541. Disclosures to carryout health insurance exchange subsidies. Permits the Exchange to receive taxpayer return information from the Internal Revenue Service…
- Sec. 551. Surcharge on high income individuals. Establishes a 5.4 percent tax on modified adjusted gross income in excess of $1 million in the case of a joint return ($500,000 in the case of other returns).
- Sec. 552. Excise tax on medical devices. Establishes a 2.5 percent excise tax on medical devices sold for use in the U.S.
Click here for the House health care bill. Warning: it’s 1,990 pages.
Update: Here is a short 4-page propaganda summary from the House Ways and Means Committee.
October 29th, 2009 at 11:00 am
You Can’t Handle the Bill!
After taking intense criticism for not being open and transparent, the House of Representatives just posted a new version of health care “reform” online.
If you have a slow Internet connection, then you better take a coffee break while downloading. The bill is 1,990 pages or more than six football fields long when placed end-to-end.
Pelosi’s pledge on the legislation, “It will not add one dime to the deficit.” How does she get there you ask? Of course by raising taxes in an effort to make the bill “deficit neutral.”
More analysis to come…
CFIF Freedom Line Blog RSS Feed
CFIF on X
CFIF on YouTube